Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Vitamin D receptor variability and physical activity are jointly associated with low handgrip strength and osteoporosis in community-dwelling elderly people in Taiwan: the Taichung Community Health Study for Elders (TCHS-E)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

We studied 472 elders to assess joint association of vitamin D receptor (VDR) variability and physical activity on low handgrip strength (LHS) and osteoporosis (OST). Our findings showed that higher risks of OST were associated with physically inactive elders with some specific VDR variations, highlighting the importance of promotion program for physical activity.

Introduction

The aim of this study was to determine the joint association between VDR variability and physical activity on LHS and OST in community-dwelling elders.

Methods

Bone mineral density of the lumbar spine (LS), the femoral neck (FN), and the total hip were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Four single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (rs7975232, rs1544410, rs2239185, and rs3782905) of the VDR gene were examined in 472 participants.

Results

Physical inactivity and each of the four SNPs were jointly associated with a significantly greater risk of LHS in people than that associated with each of the VDR SNPs or low physical activity alone. Physically inactive men with the AG or AA genotype of rs2239185 had a significantly greater risk of overall, LS, and FN OST than those of physically active men with the GG genotype [odds ratio (OR) 3.57, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.10–11.65; OR 4.74, 95 % CI 1.43–15.70; and OR 5.06, 95 % CI 1.08–23.71, respectively]. Similarly, physically inactive women with the CG or CC genotype of rs3782905 and the AG or AA genotype of rs1544410 had a significantly greater risk of FN OST than physically active women with the GG genotype (OR 5.33, 95 % CI 1.23–23.06 and OR 5.36, 95 % CI 1.11–25.94, respectively).

Conclusions

VDR polymorphisms and physical activity are jointly associated with LHS and OST in elders. Health care programs should promote physical activity among elders as a cost-effective way to prevent LHS and OST, especially in those who may be genetically predisposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Haussler MR, Whitfield GK, Haussler CA, Hsieh JC, Thompson PD, Selznick SH, Dominguez CE, Jurutka PW (1998) The nuclear vitamin D receptor: biological and molecular regulatory properties revealed. J Bone Min Res: Off J Am Soc Bone Min Res 13(3):325–349. doi:10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.3.325

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Freedman LP (1999) Transcriptional targets of the vitamin D3 receptor-mediating cell cycle arrest and differentiation. J Nutr 129(2S Suppl):581S–586S

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tsai KS, Hsu SH, Cheng WC, Chen CK, Chieng PU, Pan WH (1996) Bone mineral density and bone markers in relation to vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms in Chinese men and women. Bone 19(5):513–518

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lins TC, Vieira RG, Grattapaglia D, Pereira RW (2011) Population analysis of vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and the role of genetic ancestry in an admixed population. Genet Mol Biol 34(3):377–385. doi:10.1590/S1415-47572011000300003

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Uitterlinden AG, Fang Y, Van Meurs JB, Pols HA, Van Leeuwen JP (2004) Genetics and biology of vitamin D receptor polymorphisms. Gene 338(2):143–156. doi:10.1016/j.gene.2004.05.014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Holick MF (2003) Vitamin D: A millennium perspective. J Cell Biochem 88(2):296–307. doi:10.1002/jcb.10338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ng MY, Sham PC, Paterson AD, Chan V, Kung AW (2006) Effect of environmental factors and gender on the heritability of bone mineral density and bone size. Ann Human Genet 70(Pt 4):428–438. doi:10.1111/j.1469-1809.2005.00242.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu YZ, Liu YJ, Recker RR, Deng HW (2003) Molecular studies of identification of genes for osteoporosis: the 2002 update. J Endocrinol 177(2):147–196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ferrari SL, Rizzoli R (2005) Gene variants for osteoporosis and their pleiotropic effects in aging. Mol Asp Med 26(3):145–167. doi:10.1016/j.mam.2005.01.002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Morrison NA, Qi JC, Tokita A, Kelly PJ, Crofts L, Nguyen TV, Sambrook PN, Eisman JA (1994) Prediction of bone density from vitamin D receptor alleles. Nature 367(6460):284–287. doi:10.1038/367284a0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Melhus H, Kindmark A, Amer S, Wilen B, Lindh E, Ljunghall S (1994) Vitamin D receptor genotypes in osteoporosis. Lancet 344(8927):949–950

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Spector TD, Keen RW, Arden NK, Morrison NA, Major PJ, Nguyen TV, Kelly PJ, Baker JR, Sambrook PN, Lanchbury JS et al (1995) Influence of vitamin D receptor genotype on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: a twin study in Britain. BMJ 310(6991):1357–1360

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Keen RW, Major PJ, Lanchbury JS, Spector TD (1995) Vitamin-D-receptor-gene polymorphism and bone loss. Lancet 345(8955):990

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lexell J (1995) Human aging, muscle mass, and fiber type composition. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 50:11–16, Spec No

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hurley BF (1995) Age, gender, and muscular strength. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 50:41–44, Spec No

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gloth FM 3rd, Gundberg CM, Hollis BW, Haddad JG Jr, Tobin JD (1995) Vitamin D deficiency in homebound elderly persons. JAMA 274(21):1683–1686

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Annweiler C, Schott-Petelaz AM, Berrut G, Kressig RW, Bridenbaugh S, Herrmann FR, Beauchet O (2009) Vitamin D deficiency-related quadriceps weakness: results of the Epidemiologie De l'Osteoporose cohort. J Am Geriatr Soc 57(2):368–369. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02118.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Annweiler C, Beauchet O, Berrut G, Fantino B, Bonnefoy M, Herrmann FR, Schott AM (2009) Is there an association between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration and muscle strength among older women? Results from baseline assessment of the EPIDOS study. J Nutr, Health Aging 13(2):90–95

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Geusens P, Vandevyver C, Vanhoof J, Cassiman JJ, Boonen S, Raus J (1997) Quadriceps and grip strength are related to vitamin D receptor genotype in elderly nonobese women. J Bone Min Res: Off J Am Soc Bone Min Res 12(12):2082–2088. doi:10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.12.2082

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Morseth B, Emaus N, Wilsgaard T, Jacobsen BK, Jorgensen L (2010) Leisure time physical activity in adulthood is positively associated with bone mineral density 22 years later. The Tromso study. Eur J Epidemiol 25(5):325–331. doi:10.1007/s10654-010-9450-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Vivanco-Munoz N, Jo T, Gerardo HB, Juan T, Clark P (2012) Physical activity and dark skin tone: protective factors against low bone mass in Mexican men. J Clin Densitom: Off J Int Soc Clin Densitom 15(3):374–379. doi:10.1016/j.jocd.2012.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Englund U, Nordstrom P, Nilsson J, Bucht G, Bjornstig U, Hallmans G, Svensson O, Pettersson U (2011) Physical activity in middle-aged women and hip fracture risk: the UFO study. Osteoporos Int: J Established Result Cooperation Between Eur Found Osteoporos Nat Osteoporos Found USA 22(2):499–505. doi:10.1007/s00198-010-1234-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ip EH, Church T, Marshall SA, Zhang Q, Marsh AP, Guralnik J, King AC, Rejeski WJ, Investigators L-PS (2013) Physical activity increases gains in and prevents loss of physical function: results from the lifestyle interventions and independence for elders pilot study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 68(4):426–432. doi:10.1093/gerona/gls186

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tikkanen P, Nykanen I, Lonnroos E, Sipila S, Sulkava R, Hartikainen S (2012) Physical activity at age of 20–64 years and mobility and muscle strength in old age: a community-based study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 67(8):905–910. doi:10.1093/gerona/gls005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jarvinen TL, Jarvinen TA, Sievanen H, Heinonen A, Tanner M, Huang XH, Nenonen A, Isola JJ, Jarvinen M, Kannus P (1998) Vitamin D receptor alleles and bone's response to physical activity. Calcif Tissue Int 62(5):413–417

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Salamone LM, Glynn NW, Black DM, Ferrell RE, Palermo L, Epstein RS, Kuller LH, Cauley JA (1996) Determinants of premenopausal bone mineral density: the interplay of genetic and lifestyle factors. J Bone Min Res: Off J Am Soc Bone Min Res 11(10):1557–1565. doi:10.1002/jbmr.5650111024

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lin CC, Li CI, Chang CK, Liu CS, Lin CH, Meng NH, Lee YD, Chen FN, Li TC (2011) Reduced health-related quality of life in elders with frailty: a cross-sectional study of community-dwelling elders in Taiwan. PLoS One 6(7):e21841. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021841 PONE-D-11-02005

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, Seeman T, Tracy R, Kop WJ, Burke G, McBurnie MA (2001) Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 56(3):M146–156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kanis JA (2007) Assessment of osteoporosis at the primary health-care level. World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases. University of Sheffield, Sheffield

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ingles SA, Haile RW, Henderson BE, Kolonel LN, Nakaichi G, Shi CY, Yu MC, Ross RK, Coetzee GA (1997) Strength of linkage disequilibrium between two vitamin D receptor markers in five ethnic groups: implications for association studies. Cancer Epidemiol, Biomark Prev: Publ Am Assoc Cancer Res, Am Soc Prev Oncol 6(2):93–98

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Engelman CD, Fingerlin TE, Langefeld CD, Hicks PJ, Rich SS, Wagenknecht LE, Bowden DW, Norris JM (2008) Genetic and environmental determinants of 25-hydroxyvitamin D and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels in Hispanic and African Americans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93(9):3381–3388. doi:10.1210/jc.2007-2702

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ochs-Balcom HM, Chennamaneni R, Millen AE, Shields PG, Marian C, Trevisan M, Freudenheim JL (2011) Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms are associated with adiposity phenotypes. Am J Clin Nutr 93(1):5–10. doi:10.3945/ajcn.2010.29986

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ioannidis JP, Ntzani EE, Trikalinos TA (2004) ‘Racial’ differences in genetic effects for complex diseases. Nat Genet 36(12):1312–1318. doi:10.1038/ng1474

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kurabayashi T, Tomita M, Matsushita H, Yahata T, Honda A, Takakuwa K, Tanaka K (1999) Association of vitamin D and estrogen receptor gene polymorphism with the effect of hormone replacement therapy on bone mineral density in Japanese women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180(5):1115–1120

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Willing M, Sowers M, Aron D, Clark MK, Burns T, Bunten C, Crutchfield M, D'Agostino D, Jannausch M (1998) Bone mineral density and its change in white women: estrogen and vitamin D receptor genotypes and their interaction. J Bone Min Res: Off J Am Soc Bone Min Res 13(4):695–705. doi:10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.4.695

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Thakkinstian A, D'Este C, Eisman J, Nguyen T, Attia J (2004) Meta-analysis of molecular association studies: vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and BMD as a case study. J Bone Min Res: Off J Am Soc Bone Min Res 19(3):419–428. doi:10.1359/JBMR.0301265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Zintzaras E, Rodopoulou P, Koukoulis GN (2006) BsmI, TaqI, ApaI and FokI polymorphisms in the vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene and the risk of osteoporosis: a meta-analysis. Dis Markers 22(5–6):317–326

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ferrari S, Rizzoli R, Chevalley T, Slosman D, Eisman JA, Bonjour JP (1995) Vitamin-D-receptor-gene polymorphisms and change in lumbar-spine bone mineral density. Lancet 345(8947):423–424

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Christensen MH, Apalset EM, Nordbo Y, Varhaug JE, Mellgren G, Lien EA (2013) 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D and the vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism Apa1 influence bone mineral density in primary hyperparathyroidism. PLoS One 8(2):e56019. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0056019

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Blimkie CJR, Chilibeck PD, Davison KS (1996) Bone mineralization patterns: reproductive endocrine, calcium, and physical activity influences during the life span. In: Bar-Or O, Lamb DR, Clarkson PM (eds) Perspectives in exercise and sports medicine, vol 9, Exercise and the female: a life span approach. Cooper Pub. Group, Carmel, pp 73–145

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wolff I, van Croonenborg JJ, Kemper HC, Kostense PJ, Twisk JW (1999) The effect of exercise training programs on bone mass: a meta-analysis of published controlled trials in pre- and postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int: J Established Result Cooperation Between Eur Found Osteoporos Nat Osteoporos Found USA 9(1):1–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Houston LA, Grant SF, Reid DM, Ralston SH (1996) Vitamin D receptor polymorphism, bone mineral density, and osteoporotic vertebral fracture: studies in a UK population. Bone 18(3):249–252

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ferrari SL, Rizzoli R, Slosman DO, Bonjour JP (1998) Do dietary calcium and age explain the controversy surrounding the relationship between bone mineral density and vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms? J Bone Min Res: Off J Am Soc Bone Min Res 13(3):363–370. doi:10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.3.363

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Blanchet C, Giguere Y, Prud'homme D, Dumont M, Rousseau F, Dodin S (2002) Association of physical activity and bone: influence of vitamin D receptor genotype. Med Sci Sports Exerc 34(1):24–31

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Naganathan V, Macgregor A, Snieder H, Nguyen T, Spector T, Sambrook P (2002) Gender differences in the genetic factors responsible for variation in bone density and ultrasound. J Bone Min Res: Off J Am Soc Bone Min Res 17(4):725–733. doi:10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.4.725

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by grants from the National Health Research Institutes of Taiwan (NHRI-EX98-9838PI), China Medical University (CMU102-S-17), and the Taiwan Department of Health Clinical Trial and Research Center of Excellence (DOH102-TD-B-111-004).

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to T.-C. Li or C.-C. Lin.

Additional information

F.-Y. Wu and C.-S. Liu contributed equally as the first authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wu, FY., Liu, CS., Liao, LN. et al. Vitamin D receptor variability and physical activity are jointly associated with low handgrip strength and osteoporosis in community-dwelling elderly people in Taiwan: the Taichung Community Health Study for Elders (TCHS-E). Osteoporos Int 25, 1917–1929 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-014-2691-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-014-2691-8

Keywords

Navigation