Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Generation of a 3D proximal femur shape from a single projection 2D radiographic image

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

Generalized Procrustes analysis and thin plate splines were employed to create an average 3D shape template of the proximal femur that was warped to the size and shape of a single 2D radiographic image of a subject. Mean absolute depth errors are comparable with previous approaches utilising multiple 2D input projections.

Introduction

Several approaches have been adopted to derive volumetric density (g cm-3) from a conventional 2D representation of areal bone mineral density (BMD, g cm-2). Such approaches have generally aimed at deriving an average depth across the areal projection rather than creating a formal 3D shape of the bone.

Methods

Generalized Procrustes analysis and thin plate splines were employed to create an average 3D shape template of the proximal femur that was subsequently warped to suit the size and shape of a single 2D radiographic image of a subject. CT scans of excised human femora, 18 and 24 scanned at pixel resolutions of 1.08 mm and 0.674 mm, respectively, were equally split into training (created 3D shape template) and test cohorts.

Results

The mean absolute depth errors of 3.4 mm and 1.73 mm, respectively, for the two CT pixel sizes are comparable with previous approaches based upon multiple 2D input projections.

Conclusions

This technique has the potential to derive volumetric density from BMD and to facilitate 3D finite element analysis for prediction of the mechanical integrity of the proximal femur. It may further be applied to other anatomical bone sites such as the distal radius and lumbar spine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Njeh CF, Fuerst T, Hans D, Blake GM, Genant HK (1999) Radiation exposure in bone mineral density assessment. Appl Radiat Isotopes 50:215–236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Carter DR, Bouxsein ML, Marcus R (1992) New approaches for interpreting projected bone densitometry data. J Bone Miner Res 7:137–145

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jergas M, Breitenseher M, Gluer CC, Yu W, Genant HK (1995) Estimates of volumetric bone density from projectional measurements improve the discriminatory capability of dual x-ray absorptiometry. J Bone Miner Res 10:1101–1110

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cvijetic S, Korsic M (2004) Apparent bone mineral density estimated from DXA in healthy men and women. Osteoporos Int 15:295–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Duboef F, Pommet R, Meunier PJ, Delmas PD (1994) Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry of the spine in anteroposterior and lateral projections. Osteoporos Int 4:110–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sabin MA, Blake GM, MacLaughlin-Black SM, Fogelman I (1995) The accuracy of volumetric bone density measurements in dual x-ray absorptiometry. Calcif Tissue Int 56:210–214

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Peel NFA, Eastell R (1994) Diagnostic value of estimated volumetric bone mineral density of the lumbar spine in osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 9:317–320

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Boyanov M, Popivanov P, Gentchev G (2002) Assessment of forearm volumetric bone mineral density from standard areal densitometry data. J Clin Densitom 5:391–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Leslie WD, DeVos G, Dupont JO, Peterdy AE (2001) Reproducibility of volume-adjusted bone mineral denity of spine and hip from dual x-ray absorptiometry. J Clin Densitom 4:307–312

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hou Y-L, Wu X-P, Luo X-H, Zhang H, Cao X-Z, Jiang Y-B, Liao E-Y (2007) Differences in age-related bone mass of proximal femur between Chinese women and different ethnic women in the United States. J Bone Miner Metab 25:243–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Caponetti l, Fanelli AM (1990) 3D bone reconstruction from two x-ray views. In Proc IEEE Conf Eng in Medicine and Biology, pp 208–210

  12. Nikkhade-Dehkordi B, Bro-Nielsen M, Darvann T, Gramkow C, Egund N, Hermann K (1996) 3D reconstruction of the femoral bone using two x-ray images from orthogonal views. In Proc. Computer Assisted Radiology (CAR’96), pp 1015, Paris, France

  13. Foley JD, Dam AV, Feiner SK, Hughes JF (1990) Computer graphics: principles and practice, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley

  14. Laporte S, Skalli W, de Guise JA, Lavaste F, Mitton D (2003) A biplanar reconstruction method based on 2D and 3D contours-application to the distal femur. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 6:1–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kolta S, Le Bras A, Mitton D, Bousson V, De Guise JA, Fechtenbaum J, Laredo JD, Roux C, Skalli W (2005) Three-dimensional X-ray absorptiometry (3D-XA): a method for reconstruction of human bones using a dual X-ray absorptiometry device. Osteoporos Int 16:969–976

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kendall D (1977) The diffusion of shape. Adv Appl Probab 9:428–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zheng G, Ballester M, Styner M, Nolte L (2006). Reconstruction of patient-specific 3D bone surface from 2D calibrated fluoroscopic images and point distribution model. In Proc International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, pp 25–32. Springer Berlin/Heidelberg

  18. Lang P, Steiger P, Faulkner K, Gluer C, Genant HK (1991) Osteoporosis: Current techniques and recent developments in quantitative bone densitometry. Radiol Clin North Am 29:49–76

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Keyak JH, Kaneko TS, Tehranzadeh J, Skinner HB (2005) Predicting proximal femoral strength using structural engineering models. Clin Orthop Relat Res 437:219–228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zelditch ML, Swiderski DL, Sheets HD, Fink WL (2004) Geometric morphometrics for biologists -a primer. Elsevier Academic Press

  21. Rohlf FJ (1990) Rotational fit (procrustes) methods. In: Rohlf FJ, Bookstein FL (eds) (1990) Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometrics Workshop, number 2, University of Michigan

  22. Bookstein FL (1989) Principal warps-thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 11:567–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Manly BFJ (2000) Multivariate statistical methods, 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall/CRC

  24. Ward KA, Roy DK, Pye SR, O’Neill TW, Berry JL, Swarbrick CM, Silman AJ, Adams JE (2007) Forearm bone geometry and mineral content in UK women of European and South-Asian origin. Bone 41:117–121

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Barrett-Connor E, Siris ES, Wehren LE, Miller PD, Abbott TA, Berger ML, Santora AC, Sherwood LM (2005) Osteoporosis and fracture risk in women of different ethnic groups. J Bone Miner Res 20:185–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Meta M, Lua Y, Keyak JH, Lang T (2006) Young-elderly differences in bone density, geometry and strength indices depend on proximal femur sub-region: a cross sectional study in Caucasian-American women. Bone 36:152–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mayhew PM, Thomas CD, Clement JG, Loveridge N, Beck TJ, Bonfield W, Burgoyne CJ, Reeve J (2005) Relation between age, femoral neck cortical stability and hip fracture risk. Lancet 366:129–135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge valuable technical discussions with Dr. Christian Mathers.

Conflicts of interest

J.H. Keyak and S. Pisharody declare that they have no conflicts of interest or disclosures. C.M. Langton declares that he is the named inventor of a filed patent that incorporates the concept of 3D shape derived from a single projection 2D radiographic image.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. M. Langton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Langton, C.M., Pisharody, S. & Keyak, J.H. Generation of a 3D proximal femur shape from a single projection 2D radiographic image. Osteoporos Int 20, 455–461 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-008-0665-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-008-0665-4

Keywords

Navigation