Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Influence of fracture history and bone mineral density testing on the treatment of osteoporosis in two non-academic community centers

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A history of fracture and a low bone mineral density (BMD) are the strongest predictors of future osteoporotic fracture. This prospective cohort study assessed the impact of these two factors on treatment patterns in women undergoing their first BMD testing in a non-academic community setting. Successive women seen for first BMD testing at two testing centers completed a baseline questionnaire and a mailed 3-month follow-up questionnaire. Patients were grouped by history of fracture after age 20 years (present, absent) and by BMD result [osteoporosis (OP), osteopenia (OPN), normal BMD]. Thirty percent of 1144 patients at least 45 years old reported a history of fracture after age 20 years. They were no more likely than those without a history of fracture to be taking calcium (52% of total), vitamin D (31%), estrogen (31%), or a bisphosphonate (2%) before BMD testing. The BMD testing revealed OP in 20%, OPN in 45%, and normal BMD in 35%. Three months later, the percentages of patients taking treatments differed as follows: calcium (66 vs 53% in OP and OPN groups vs normal BMD), vitamin D (46 vs 37% in OPN group vs normal BMD), estrogen (25 vs 36 vs 44% in groups with OP, OPN, and normal BMD), a bisphosphonate (43 vs 11 vs 1%), and at least one of estrogen or a bisphosphonate (58 vs 43 vs 46%). Treatment decisions were influenced by first BMD testing but not significantly by a history of fracture. There is a substantial care gap in the treatment of patients with OP: either bisphosphonate or estrogen therapy was taken by only 31% of patients at least 45 years old and with a history of fracture after age 20 years before BMD testing and by only 58% of these and who also had OP by BMD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lindsay R, Silverman SL, Cooper C et al. (2001) Risk of new vertebral fracture in the year following a fracture. J Am Med Assoc 285:320–328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ridout R, Hawker GA (2000) Use of bone densitometry by Ontario family physicians. Osteoporosis Int 11:393–399

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hajcsar EE, Hawker G, Bogoch ER (2000) Investigation and treatment of osteoporosis in patients with fragility fractures. Can Med Assoc J 163:819–822

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. McKercher HG, Crilly RG, Kloseck M (2000) Osteoporosis management in long-term care: survey of Ontario physicians. Can Family Phys 46:2228–2235

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fitt N, Mitchell S, Cranney A et al. (2001) Influence of bone densitometry results on the treatment of osteoporosis. Can Med Assoc J 164:777–781

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Papa LJ, Weber BE (1997) Physician characteristics associated with the use of bone densitometry. J Gen Intern Med 12:781–783

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pressman A, Forsyth B, Ettinger B, Tosteson ANA (2001) Initiation of osteoporosis treatment after bone mineral density testing. Osteoporosis Int 12:337–342

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Solomon DH, Levin E, Helfgott SM (2000) Patterns of medication use before and after bone densitometry: factors associated with appropriate treatment. J Rheumatol 27:1496–1500

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Genant HK, Cooper C. Poor G et al. (1999) Interim report and recommendations of the World Health Organization task force on osteoporosis. Osteoporosis Int 10:259–264

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Juby AG, Davis P (2001) A prospective evaluation of the awareness, knowledge, risk factors and current treatment of osteoporosis in a cohort of elderly subjects. Osteoporosis Int 12:617–622

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Siris ES, Miller PD, Barrett-Connor E et al. (2001) Identification and fracture outcomes of undiagnosed low bone mineral density in postmenopausal women. Results from the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment. J Am Med Assoc 286:2815–2822

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Klotzbuecher CM, Ross PD, Landsman PB et al. (2000) Patients with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fractures: a summary of the literature and statistical synthesis. J Bone Miner Res 15:721–739

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Castel H, Bonneh DY, Sheref M, Liel Y (2001) Awareness of osteoporosis and compliance with management guidelines in patients with newly diagnosed low-impact fractures. Osteoporosis Int 12:559–564

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Silverman SL, Greenwald M, Klein RA, Drinkwater BL (1997) Effect of bone density information on decisions about hormone replacement therapy: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol 89:321–325

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rolnick SJ, Kopher R, Jackson J et al. (2001) What is the impact of osteoporosis education and bone mineral density testing for postmenopausal women in a managed care setting? Menopause 8:141–148

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rubin SM, Cummings SR (1992) Results of bone densitometry affect women’s decisions about taking measures to prevent fractures. Ann Intern Med 116:990–995

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jamal SA, Ridout R, Chase C et al. (1999) Bone mineral density testing and osteoporosis education improve lifestyle behaviors in premenopausal women: a prospective study. J Bone Miner Res 14:2143–2149

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sturtridge W, Lentle B, Hanley D (1996) Prevention and management of OP: consensus statements from the Scientific Advisory Board of the Osteoporosis Society of Canada. 2. The use of bone density measurement in the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. Can Med Assoc J 155:924–929

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Brown JP, Josse RG, The Scientific Advisory Council of the Osteoporosis Society of Canada (2002) 2002 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada. Can Med Assoc J 167:1S–34S

    Google Scholar 

  20. Angbratt M, Moller M (1999) Questionnaire about calcium intake: Can we trust the answers? Osteoporosis Int 9:220–225

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement. This study was supported by an unrestricted grant from Eli Lilly Canada, Inc.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rolf J. Sebaldt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hamel, M.E., Sebaldt, R.J., Siminoski, K. et al. Influence of fracture history and bone mineral density testing on the treatment of osteoporosis in two non-academic community centers. Osteoporos Int 16, 208–215 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-004-1776-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-004-1776-1

Keywords

Navigation