Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis
Stabilization of the vaginal apex (level 1) is an important component of operations to correct pelvic organ prolapse (POP). We report functional and anatomical results and patient-reported outcomes of our technique of vaginal vault fixation at the time of vaginal hysterectomy.
Methods
One hundred and nine patients—mean 69 years, range 50.4–83.8; body mass index (BMI) 26.3, range 17.7–39.5—with symptomatic stage 2–3 uterine prolapse combined with stage 3–4 cystocele underwent vaginal hysterectomy with anterior vaginal wall repair; the apex was formed with high closure of the peritoneum and incorporation of the uterosacral and round ligaments. Only absorbable sutures were used. Follow-up included clinical examination with Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system (POP-Q) scoring, introital ultrasonography, quality of life (QoL) Likert scale, and the German Pelvic Floor Questionnaire.
Results
Seventy patients (64%) were available for a follow-up after a mean of 2.8 years (range, 1.6–4.2). At follow-up, point C was stage 0 in 55 (78.6%) women and stage 1 in 15 (21.4%). The anterior vaginal wall was stage 0 or 1 in 35 (50%), stage 2 (no cystocele beyond the hymen) in 34 (49%), and stage 3 in 1 (1.4%). Vaginal length (VL) was 9 cm. Four women (4%) were reoperated for prolapse: two for recurrent anterior compartment prolapse and two for de novo rectocele. Postvoid residuals >150 ml were seen in 21(30%) patients preoperatively and resolved postoperatively in 20. Urgency occurred in nine (13%), stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in ten (14%), and nocturia in 19 (27%). No patient had discomfort at the vaginal vault and 62 patients (87%) reported improved QoL, which did not correlate with anatomical results. Cystocele ≥ 2° at follow-up was associated with BMI >25 (p = 0.03).
Conclusions
Our surgical technique without permanent material offers good apical support and functional and subjective results. Anatomical improvement was achieved in all cases of cystocele repair. Recurrent cystoceles are often asymptomatic.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fialkow MF, Newton KM, Lentz GM, Weiss NS. Lifetime risk of surgical management for pelvic organ prolapse or urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19(3):437–40.
Graefe, et al. Vaginal vault suspension at hysterectomy for prolapse–myths and facts, anatomical requirements, fixation techniques, documentation and cost accounting. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2012;72:1099–106.
Bump RC, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:10–7.
Baessler K. Validation of a pelvic floor questionnaire with improvement and satisfaction scales to assess symptom severity, bothersomeness and quality of life before and after pelvic floor therapy. Aktuelle Urol. 2011;42:316–22.
Moschcowitz AV. The pathogenesis, anatomy, and cure of prolapse of the rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1912;15:7–12.
Cruikshank SH, Kovac SR. Randomized comparison of three surgical methods used at the time of vaginal hysterectomy to prevent posterior enterocele. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180:859–65.
Colombo M, Milani R. Sacrospinous ligament fixation and modified McCall culdoplasty during vaginal hysterectomy for advanced uterovaginal prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179:13–20.
Chene G, Tardieu AS, Savary D, et al. Anatomical and functional results of McCall culdoplasty in the prevention of enteroceles and vaginal vault prolapse after vaginal hysterectomy. Int Urogynecol J. 2008;19:1007–11.
Shull BL, Bachofen C, Coates KW, et al. A transvaginal approach to repair of apical and other associated sites of pelvic organ prolapse with uterosacral ligaments. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183:1365–74.
Amreich IA. Ätiologie und Operation des Scheidenstumpfprolapses. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1951;63:74–7.
Richter K. Die chirurgische Anatomie der Vaginaefixatio sacrospinalis vaginalis. Ein Beitrag zur operativen Behandlung des Scheidenblindsackprolapses. Geburtsh Frauenheilk. 1968;28:321–7.
Maher CF, Cary MP, Slack MC, et al. Uterine preservation or hysterectomy at sacrospinous colpopexy for uterovaginal prolapse? Int Urogynecol J. 2001;12:381–5.
Lopes ED, Lemos NL, Carramão Sda S, et al. Transvaginal polypropylene mesh versus sacrospinous ligament fixation for the treatment of uterine prolapse: 1-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21:389–94.
Florian-Rodrigues ME, et al. Inferior gluteal and other nerves associated with sacrospinous ligament: a cadaver study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215:646.e1-e6.
Weiblicher Descensus genitalis, Diagnostik und Therapie. AWMF Registry No. 015–006, April 2016.
Barber, et al. Comparison of 2 transvaginal surgical approaches and perioperative behavioral therapy for apical vaginal prolapse: the OPTIMAL randomized trial. JAMA. 2014;311:1023–34.
Barber MD, et al. Defining success after surgery for POP. Obstet Gxneecol. 2009;114:600–9.
Barber MD, Maher C. Epidemiology and outcome assessment of POP. IUJ. 2013;24:1783–90.
Vergeldt, et al. Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse and its recurrence: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26:1559–73.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
None.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marschke, J., Pax, C.M., Beilecke, K. et al. Vaginal hysterectomy with apical fixation and anterior vaginal wall repair for prolapse: surgical technique and medium-term results. Int Urogynecol J 29, 1187–1192 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3600-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3600-z