Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The relationship between age and pelvic organ prolapse bother

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

A variety of factors affect the amount of bother experienced by different women with equivalent pelvic organ prolapse (POP). The goal of this study was to describe the relationship between age and bother experienced from objectively equivalent stages of POP.

Methods

Records of all patients presenting to a pelvic floor subspecialty clinic between January 2014 and March 2015 were reviewed. Women with POP stage ≥ 2 were included. The level of bother experienced from prolapse symptoms was defined as the score on the validated Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory (POPDI). Multiple linear regression was performed to examine the relationship between age and the POPDI score. A sample size of 150 patients was determined to have 80 % power to detect an effect of age equivalent to an increase in R2 of 0.05.

Results

A total of 229 charts were reviewed and 165 patients were included in the final analysis. The effect of age on prolapse bother in the entire population was quadratic (p = 0.0497). Women at both ends of the spectrum were less bothered by prolapse, whereas women in the 6th and 7th decades of life demonstrated the highest level of bother, irrespective of stage. This same quadratic relationship remained in women with stage 2 prolapse (p = 0.019).

Conclusions

Women in the 6th and 7th decades of life experience higher levels of bother from POP than older or younger women with the same stage of prolapse. This suggests that women in these decades of life might be at a higher risk for impairment of quality of life from POP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barber M, Maher C. Epidemiology and outcome assessment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(11):1783–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ghetti C, Skoczylas LC. The emotional burden of pelvic organ prolapse in women seeking treatment: a qualitative study. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2015;21(6):332–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Jelovsek JE, Barber MD. Women seeking treatment for advanced pelvic organ prolapse have decreased body image and quality of life. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194:1455–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Boyles S, Weber A, Meyn L. Procedures for pelvic organ prolapse in the United States, 1979–1997. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188(1):108–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89(4):501–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sullivan SA, Davidson E, Bretschneider EC, Liberty AL, Geller EJ. Patient characteristics associated with treatment choice for pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;27:811–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dunivan G, Cichowski S, Komesu Y, Fairchild P, Anger J, Rogers R. Ethnicity and variations of pelvic organ prolapse bother. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;25(1):53–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC. Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(1):103–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Barber MD, Kuchibhatla MN, Pieper CF, Bump RC. Psychometric evaluation of 2 comprehensive condition-specific quality of life instruments for women with pelvic floor disorders. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185(6):1388–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Agresti A. Categorical data analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 2002.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Levine KB, Williams RE, Hartmann KE. Vulvovaginal atrophy is strongly associated with female sexual dysfunction among sexually active postmenopausal women. Menopause. 2008;15(4 Pt 1):661–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Swift SE, Tate SB, Nicholas J. Correlation of symptoms with degree of pelvic organ support in a general population of women: what is pelvic organ prolapse? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189:372–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yong HH, Gibson SJ, De L, Horne DJ, Helme RD. Development of a pain attitudes questionnaire to assess stoicism and cautiousness for possible age differences. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2001;56(5):279–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Louisville, 550 S. Jackson Street, 1st Floor, Louisville, KY, 40202, USA

    Casey L. Kinman, Courtney A. Lemieux, Anubhav Agrawal, Kate V. Meriwether & Sean L. Francis

  2. Department of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Information Sciences, University of Louisville, 485 E. Grey Street, Louisville, KY, 40202, USA

    Jeremy T. Gaskins

Authors
  1. Casey L. Kinman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Courtney A. Lemieux
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anubhav Agrawal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jeremy T. Gaskins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kate V. Meriwether
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sean L. Francis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Casey L. Kinman.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kinman, C.L., Lemieux, C.A., Agrawal, A. et al. The relationship between age and pelvic organ prolapse bother. Int Urogynecol J 28, 751–755 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3175-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3175-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation