Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis
The aim of this study was to describe perineum deformation during the final part of delivery and suggest a modification of the episiotomy cut to increase accuracy for obtaining a suitable angle (45°) for surgical wound suture.
Methods
This prospective study enrolled 45 primiparous women. The perineum at rest was marked with five lines (0°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 90°), and each line was marked with two dots (point A–B: to 2–3 cm from initial point in fourchette, respectively). Two digital pictures were taken: one with the women at rest and the second during fetal head crowning; displacements were calculated for each point and angle.
Results
When the perineum is distending, the initial point of every line in the posterior fourchette moves laterally in introitus (only the 0° line remains at midline). The angle and the distance to points A and B of each line drawn do not change significantly from at rest to crowning. However, comparing original line configuration with an imaginary line from the fourchette to points A and B before expulsion, the angle and the distance is increased statistically significantly.
Conclusions
Perineal distension at the moment of fetal head crowning causes a linear displacement of the perineum, which causes the difference in angle between the incision and episiotomy suture. Therefore, to obtain an episiotomy suture from fourchette with an angle of 45°, theoretically, we would have several angle incision options (between 45° and 60°), with a less acute angle when the introitus cut is closer to the fourchette (45° to 6 mm and ∼60° in the fourchette) and a sharper angle with a longer episiotomy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Carroli G, Mignini L. Episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(1):CD000081. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000081.pub2.
Andrews V, Thakar R, Sultan AH, Jones PW. Are mediolateral episiotomies actually mediolateral? BJOG. 2005;112:1156–8.
Eogan M, Daly L, O’Connell PR, O’Herlihy C. Does the angle of episiotomy affect the incidence of anal sphincter injury? BJOG. 2006;113:190–4.
Stedenfeldt M, Pirhonen J, Blix E, Wilsgaard T, Vonen B, Øian P. Episiotomy characteristics and risks for obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a case–control study. BJOG. 2012;119:724–30.
Gonzalez-Díaz E, Moreno Cea L, Fernández Corona A. Trigonometric characteristics of episiotomy and risks for obstetric anal sphincter injuries in operative vaginal delivery. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26:235–42.
Kalis V, Karbanova J, Horak M, Lobovsky L, Kralickova M, Rokyta Z. The incision angle before and after repair of mediolateral episiotomy. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2008;103(1):5–8.
Kalis V, Landsmanova J, Bednarova B, Karbanova J, Laine K, Rokyta Z. Evaluation of the incision angle of mediolateral episiotomy at 60 degrees. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011;112:220–4.
Tincello DG, Williams A, Fowler GE, Adams EJ, Richmond DH, Alfirevic Z. Differences in episiotomy technique between midwives and doctors. BJOG. 2003;110:1041–4.
Gonzalez-Díaz E, Fernández Fernández C, Fernández Corona A. Differences in characteristics of mediolateral episiotomy in professionals at the same hospital. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015;18:1–5.
Zemcik R, Karbanova J, Kalis V, Lobovsky L, Jansova M, Rusavy Z. Stereophotogrammetry of the perineum during vaginal delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012;119:76–80.
Kalis V, Karbanova J, Bukacova Z, Bednarova B, Rokyta Z, Kralickova M. Anal dilatation during labor. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010;109:136–9.
Lien KC, Mooney B, DeLancey JO, Ashton-Miller JA. Levator ani muscle stretch induced by simulated vaginal birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103:31–40.
Freeman RM, Hollands H, Barron L, Kapoor DS. Cutting a mediolateral episiotomy at the correct angle: evaluation of a new device: the Episcissors-60. Med Devices (Auckl). 2014;7:23–8. doi:10.2147/MDER.S60056.
Patel R, Ubale S. Evaluation of the angled Episcissors-60(®) episiotomy scissors in spontaneous vaginal deliveries. Med Devices (Auckl). 2014;7:253–6.
Eliashiv O, Ginath S, Weiner E, Sadan O, Golan A, Condrea A. Mediolateral episiotomy-is the angle of incision performed at crowning the correct and desired one? Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24:S68.
DeLancey J. Episiotomy: what’s the angle? Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2008;103:3–4.
Kalis V, Laine K, de Leeuw J, Ismail K, Tincello D. Classification of episiotomy: towards a standardisation of terminology. BJOG. 2012;119:522–6.
Acknowledgments
We thank all women and midwives who participated in the study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Financial disclaimer
None.
Conflicts of interest
None.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gonzalez-Díaz, E., Fernández Fernández, C., Fernández Galguera, M.J. et al. Behavior of perineum during delivery before fetal head expulsion. Int Urogynecol J 28, 375–380 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3166-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3166-6