Skip to main content
Log in

Behavior of perineum during delivery before fetal head expulsion

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The aim of this study was to describe perineum deformation during the final part of delivery and suggest a modification of the episiotomy cut to increase accuracy for obtaining a suitable angle (45°) for surgical wound suture.

Methods

This prospective study enrolled 45 primiparous women. The perineum at rest was marked with five lines (0°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 90°), and each line was marked with two dots (point A–B: to 2–3 cm from initial point in fourchette, respectively). Two digital pictures were taken: one with the women at rest and the second during fetal head crowning; displacements were calculated for each point and angle.

Results

When the perineum is distending, the initial point of every line in the posterior fourchette moves laterally in introitus (only the 0° line remains at midline). The angle and the distance to points A and B of each line drawn do not change significantly from at rest to crowning. However, comparing original line configuration with an imaginary line from the fourchette to points A and B before expulsion, the angle and the distance is increased statistically significantly.

Conclusions

Perineal distension at the moment of fetal head crowning causes a linear displacement of the perineum, which causes the difference in angle between the incision and episiotomy suture. Therefore, to obtain an episiotomy suture from fourchette with an angle of 45°, theoretically, we would have several angle incision options (between 45° and 60°), with a less acute angle when the introitus cut is closer to the fourchette (45° to 6 mm and ∼60° in the fourchette) and a sharper angle with a longer episiotomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carroli G, Mignini L. Episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(1):CD000081. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000081.pub2.

  2. Andrews V, Thakar R, Sultan AH, Jones PW. Are mediolateral episiotomies actually mediolateral? BJOG. 2005;112:1156–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Eogan M, Daly L, O’Connell PR, O’Herlihy C. Does the angle of episiotomy affect the incidence of anal sphincter injury? BJOG. 2006;113:190–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stedenfeldt M, Pirhonen J, Blix E, Wilsgaard T, Vonen B, Øian P. Episiotomy characteristics and risks for obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a case–control study. BJOG. 2012;119:724–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Gonzalez-Díaz E, Moreno Cea L, Fernández Corona A. Trigonometric characteristics of episiotomy and risks for obstetric anal sphincter injuries in operative vaginal delivery. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26:235–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kalis V, Karbanova J, Horak M, Lobovsky L, Kralickova M, Rokyta Z. The incision angle before and after repair of mediolateral episiotomy. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2008;103(1):5–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kalis V, Landsmanova J, Bednarova B, Karbanova J, Laine K, Rokyta Z. Evaluation of the incision angle of mediolateral episiotomy at 60 degrees. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011;112:220–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tincello DG, Williams A, Fowler GE, Adams EJ, Richmond DH, Alfirevic Z. Differences in episiotomy technique between midwives and doctors. BJOG. 2003;110:1041–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gonzalez-Díaz E, Fernández Fernández C, Fernández Corona A. Differences in characteristics of mediolateral episiotomy in professionals at the same hospital. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015;18:1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zemcik R, Karbanova J, Kalis V, Lobovsky L, Jansova M, Rusavy Z. Stereophotogrammetry of the perineum during vaginal delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012;119:76–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kalis V, Karbanova J, Bukacova Z, Bednarova B, Rokyta Z, Kralickova M. Anal dilatation during labor. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010;109:136–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lien KC, Mooney B, DeLancey JO, Ashton-Miller JA. Levator ani muscle stretch induced by simulated vaginal birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103:31–40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Freeman RM, Hollands H, Barron L, Kapoor DS. Cutting a mediolateral episiotomy at the correct angle: evaluation of a new device: the Episcissors-60. Med Devices (Auckl). 2014;7:23–8. doi:10.2147/MDER.S60056.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Patel R, Ubale S. Evaluation of the angled Episcissors-60(®) episiotomy scissors in spontaneous vaginal deliveries. Med Devices (Auckl). 2014;7:253–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Eliashiv O, Ginath S, Weiner E, Sadan O, Golan A, Condrea A. Mediolateral episiotomy-is the angle of incision performed at crowning the correct and desired one? Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24:S68.

    Google Scholar 

  16. DeLancey J. Episiotomy: what’s the angle? Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2008;103:3–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kalis V, Laine K, de Leeuw J, Ismail K, Tincello D. Classification of episiotomy: towards a standardisation of terminology. BJOG. 2012;119:522–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank all women and midwives who participated in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enrique Gonzalez-Díaz.

Ethics declarations

Financial disclaimer

None.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gonzalez-Díaz, E., Fernández Fernández, C., Fernández Galguera, M.J. et al. Behavior of perineum during delivery before fetal head expulsion. Int Urogynecol J 28, 375–380 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3166-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3166-6

Keywords

Navigation