Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Contasure-Needleless® single incision sling compared with transobturator TVT-O ® for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: long-term results

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

This study compared transobturator tension-free vaginal tape (TVT-O®) and Contasure-Needleless (C-NDL®) at long-term follow-up .

Methods

Non-inferiority, prospective, single-centre , quasi-randomised trial started in September 2006 and finished in April 2011 to compare C-NDL ® with transobturator vaginal tape (TVT-O®) mesh in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) . Epidemiological information, intraoperative and postoperative complications, subjective estimates of blood loss and pain levels were recorded. We also analysed the postoperative stress test, the subjective impression of improvement using the Sandvik Severity Index and the quality of life during follow-up using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF) .

Results

Two hundred and fifty-seven women with primary SUI were scheduled to receive TVT-O ® or C-NDL ® and were followed up at least 3 years after the procedure . One hundred and eleven women in the C-NDL ® group (84.7 %) had a negative stress test, compared with 54 women (88.9 %) in the TVT-O ® group (p = 0.0065 for the non-inferiority test). The postoperative Sandvik Severity Index was 0 or better than the preoperative score in 90.7 % of patients in the C-NDL ® group and 95.4 % of patients in the TVT-O ® group (p = 0.0022). The complication rate was similar in both groups. There were significant differences (p = 0.02) in postoperative pain within the TVT-O ® group. The degree of satisfaction was not statistically significant between the two groups.

Conclusions

The outcomes for the C-NDL ® group were similar to those of the TVT-O ® group, adding the concept of “single incision tape” to the tension-free sling option.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ulmsten U, Henriksson L, Johnson P, Varhos G (1996) An ambulatory surgical procedure under local anesthesia for treatment of female urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 7:81–86

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ogah J, Cody JD, Rogerson L (2009) Minimally invasive synthetic suburethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4) :CD006375. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006375.pub2

  3. Cox A, Herschorn S, Lee L (2013) Surgical management of female SUI: is there a gold standard? Nat Rev Urol 10:78–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Delorme E (2001) Trans-obturator urethral suspension: a minimally invasive procedure to treat female stress urinary incontinence. Progr Urol 11:1306–1313

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Leval J (2003) Novel surgical technique for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: transobturator vaginal tape inside-out . Eur Urol 44:724–730

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kristensen I, Eldoma M, Williamson T et al (2010) Complications of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 21:1353–1357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lim J, Cornish A, Carey MP (2006) Clinical and quality of life outcomes in women treated by TVT-O procedure. BJOG 113:1315–1320

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Collinet P, Ciofu C, Costa P et al (2008) The safety of the inside-out transobturator approach for transvaginal tape (TVT-O) treatment in stress urinary incontinence: French registry data on 984 women. Int Urogynecol J 19:712–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sivanesan K, Abdel-Fattah M, Ghani R (2007) External iliac artery injury during insertion of tension-free vaginal tape: a case report and literature review. Int Urogynecol J 18:1105–1108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ballester M, Bui C, Frobert JL, Grisard-Anaf M, Lienhart J et al (2012) Four-year functional results of the suburethral sling procedure for stress urinary incontinence: a French prospective randomized multicentre study comparing the retropubic and transobturator routes. World J Urol 30:117–122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Serati M, Ghezz F, Cattoni E et al (2012) Tension-free vaginal tape for the treatment of urodynamic stress incontinence: efficacy and adverse effects at 10-year follow-up . Eur Urol 61:939–946

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Richter HE, Albo M, Zyczynski HM, Kenton K, Norton PA, for the Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network et al (2010) Retropubic versus transobturator midurethral slings for stress incontinence. N Engl J Med 362:2066–2076

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dyrkorn O, Kulseng-Hanssen O, Sandvik L (2010) TVT compared with TVT-O and TOT: results from the Norwegian National Incontinence Registry. Int Urogynecol J 21:1321–1326

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Angioli R, Plotti F, Muzii L et al (2010) Tension-free vaginal tape versus transobturator suburethral tape: five-year follow-up results of a prospective, randomised trial. Eur Urol 58:671–677

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mostafa A, Chou PL, Hopper L, Madhuvrata P, Abdel-Fattah M (2014) Single-incision mini-slings versus standard midurethral slings in surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness and complications. Eur Urol 65:402–427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Amat I Tardiu L, Martínez Franco E, Laïlla Vicens JM (2011) Contasure-Needleless® compared with transobturator-TVT® for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 22:827–833

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Espuña M, Rebollo P, Puig M (2004) Validación de la versión española del International Consulting on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form. Un cuestionario para evaluar la Incontinencia Urinaria. Med Clin 122:288–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sandvik H, Espuña M, Hunskaar S (2006) Validity of the incontinence severity index: comparison with pad-weighing tests. Int Urogynecol J 17:520–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ghoniem G, Stanford E, Kenton K et al (2008) Evaluation and outcome measures in the treatment of female urinary stress incontinence: International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) guidelines for research and clinical practice. Int Urogynecol J 19:5–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sung VW, Schleinitz MD, Rardin CR, Ward RM, Myers DL (2007) Comparison of retropubic vs transobturator approach to midurethral slings: a systematic review and meta-analysis . Am J Obstet Gynecol 197:3–11

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zullo MA, Plotti F, Calcagni M, Marullo E, Palaia I et al (2007) One-year follow-up of tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) and trans-obturator suburethral tape from inside to outside (TVT-O) for surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: a prospective randomised trial. Eur Urol 51:1376–1382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Liapis A, Bakas P, Giner M, Creatsas G (2006) Tension-free vaginal tape versus tension-free vaginal tape obturator in women with stress urinary incontinence. Gynecol Obstet Invest 62:160–164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Porena M, Costantini E, Frea B, Giannantoni A, Ranzoni S, Maerini L et al (2007) Tension-free vaginal tape versus transobturator tape as surgery for stress urinary incontinence: Results of a Multicentre Randomised Trial. Eur Urol 52:1481–1490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mora I, Amat Tardiu L, Martínez E, Lailla JM (2007) Analysis of efficacy and complications in the surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence: experience with retropubic and transobturator TVT®. Arch Esp Urol 60:1091–1098

    Google Scholar 

  25. Waltregny D, Gaspar Y, Reul O, Hamida W, Bonnet P, De Leval J (2008) TVT-O for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: results of a prospective study after a 3-year minimum follow-up . Eur Urol 53:401–408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Haliloglu B, Rizk DE (2010) Subjective versus objective measurement of surgical outcomes of treatment of female stress urinary incontinences: it is not just black and white. Int Urogynecol J 21:761–762

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Brubaker L, Norton PA, Albo ME, for the Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network et al (2011) Adverse events over two years after retropubic or transobturator midurethral sling surgery: findings from the Trial of Midurethral Slings (TOMUS) study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 205(498):e1–e6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Jaume Aguado for statistical support.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eva Martinez Franco.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Martinez Franco, E., Amat Tardiu, L. Contasure-Needleless® single incision sling compared with transobturator TVT-O ® for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: long-term results. Int Urogynecol J 26, 213–218 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2475-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2475-x

Keywords

Navigation