Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mesh erosion following abdominal sacral colpopexy in the absence and presence of the cervical stump

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

We compared the role of abdominal sacral colpopexy (ASCP) with concomitant supracervical hysterectomy to ASCP alone in patients with prior hysterectomy in the prevention of mesh erosion.

Materials and methods

We performed a retrospective chart review of 277 consecutive patients who underwent ASCP with one surgeon. Patients were separated into two groups based on the presence of a uterus at the time of surgery. Group A comprised195 patients with a uterus who underwent ASCP and concomitant supracervical hysterectomy; group B comprised 82 patients with prior total hysterectomy who underwent ASCP. The outcome measures included peri- and postoperative findings, complications, and surgical success. Data were analyzed by t test and chi-square test using SPSS software.

Results

No significant difference was found between groups during surgery in terms of anesthesia type, total operative time, and estimated intraoperative blood loss. At mean postoperative follow-up of 7–8 months, there was no difference between groups in terms of de novo urinary symptoms, recurrent vaginal-wall prolapse, or dyspareunia and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) point C examination. Sling erosion was observed in four (4.2 %) patients in group A versus none in group B. Apical mesh erosion was diagnosed in one patient in group A (0.5 %) and two (2.4 %) patients in group B. These differences were not statistically significant.

Conclusion

Concomitant supracervical hysterectomy with ASCP was associated with a low incidence of mesh erosion and had the same intraoperative course and postoperative outcome as ASCP with previous hysterectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

POP:

Pelvic organ prolapse

ASCP:

Abdominal sacral colpopexy

LSCP:

Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy

POP-Q:

Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification

SCH:

Supracervical hysterectomy

TAH:

Total abdominal hysterectomy

USI:

Urinary stress incontinence

References

  1. Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL (1997) Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 89:501–506

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Adams EJ, Hagen S, Glazener CM (2010) Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev:CD004014

  3. Nygaard IE, McCreery R, Brubaker L, Connolly A, Cundiff G, Weber AM, Zyczynski H (2004) Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol 104:805–823

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Maher C, Baessler K, Glazener CM, Adams EJ, Hagen S (2008) Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: a short version Cochrane review. Neurourol Urodyn 27:3–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Maher CF, Feiner B, DeCuyper EM, Nichlos CJ, Hickey KV, O'Rourke P (2011) Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy versus total vaginal mesh for vaginal vault prolapse: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 204(360):e361–e367

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cundiff GW, Varner E, Visco AG, Zyczynski HM, Nager CW, Norton PA, Schaffer J, Brown MB, Brubaker L (2008) Risk factors for mesh/suture erosion following sacral colpopexy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199(688):e681–e685

    Google Scholar 

  7. Thompson PK, Pugmire JE, Sangi-Haghpeykar H (2004) Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy Utilizing Gore-Tex in Genital Prolapse: Unresolved Issues. J Pelvic Med Surg 10:311–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brizzolara S, Pillai-Allen A (2003) Risk of mesh erosion with sacral colpopexy and concurrent hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 102:306–310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Culligan PJ, Murphy M, Blackwell L, Hammons G, Graham C, Heit MH (2002) Long-term success of abdominal sacral colpopexy using synthetic mesh. Am J Obstet Gynecol 187:1473–1480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fedorkow DM, Kalbfleisch RE (1993) Total abdominal hysterectomy at abdominal sacrovaginopexy: a comparative study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 169:641–643

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Stepanian AA, Miklos JR, Moore RD, Mattox TF (2008) Risk of mesh extrusion and other mesh-related complications after laparoscopic sacral colpopexy with or without concurrent laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: experience of 402 patients. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15:188–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wu JM, Wells EC, Hundley AF, Connolly A, Williams KS, Visco AG (2006) Mesh erosion in abdominal sacral colpopexy with and without concomitant hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 194:1418–1422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cosson M, Bogaert E, Narducci F, Querleu D, Crepin G (2000) Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy: short-term results and complications in 83 patients. J De Gynecologie, Obstetrique Et Biologie De la Reprod 29:746–750

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lethaby A, Ivanova V, Johnson NP (2006) Total versus subtotal hysterectomy for benign gynaecological conditions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev:CD004993

  15. Sayasneh A, Johnson H (2010) Risk factors for mesh erosion complicating vaginal reconstructive surgery. J Obstet Gynaecol: J Inst Obstet Gynaecol 30:721–724

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tan-Kim J, Menefee SA, Luber KM, Nager CW, Lukacz ES (2011) Prevalence and risk factors for mesh erosion after laparoscopic-assisted sacrocolpopexy. Int Urogynecol J 22:205–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Stanford EJ, Paraiso MF (2008) A comprehensive review of suburethral sling procedure complications. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15:132–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kives S, Lefebvre G, Wolfman W, Leyland N, Allaire C, Awadalla A, Best C, Leroux N, Potestio F, Rittenberg D, Soucy R, Singh S (2010) Supracervical hysterectomy. Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada: JOGC =. J D'obstetrique Et Gynecologie Du Canada: JOGC 32:62–68

    Google Scholar 

  19. Klauschie JL, Suozzi BA, O'Brien MM, McBride AW (2009) A comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal sacral colpopexy: objective outcome and perioperative differences. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20:273–279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Paraiso MF, Walters MD, Rackley RR, Melek S, Hugney C (2005) Laparoscopic and abdominal sacral colpopexies: a comparative cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:1752–1758

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tsin DA (2012) Cost minimization minilaparotomy vs laparoscopic sacral colpopexy. Am J Obstet Gynecol

  22. Costantini E, Zucchi A, Lazzeri M, Del Zingaro M, Vianello A, Porena M (2011) Managing mesh erosion after abdominal pelvic organ prolapse repair: ten years' experience in a single center. Urol Int 86:419–423

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kohli N, Walsh PM, Roat TW, Karram MM (1998) Mesh erosion after abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Obstet Gynecol 92:999–1004

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shimon Ginath.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ginath, S., Garely, A.D., Condrea, A. et al. Mesh erosion following abdominal sacral colpopexy in the absence and presence of the cervical stump. Int Urogynecol J 24, 113–118 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1845-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1845-5

Keywords

Navigation