Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pelvic floor muscle tenderness in asymptomatic, nulliparous women: topographical distribution and reliability of a visual analogue scale

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Aim of this study is to investigate pelvic floor muscle pain scores in a group of healthy, asymptomatic, nulliparous women using a simple visual analogue scale, and to examine the inter-rater and test–retest reliability of the digital palpation of the pelvic floor muscle.

Methods

Seventeen female volunteers were recruited. Different sites of their pelvic floor muscle were examined digitally according to the suggestions of the International Continence Society from two investigators blinded to the clinical data in two consecutive visits and pain scores were obtained. Level of agreement between investigators, inter-rater and intra-rater reliability were assessed.

Results

Overall pain scores were low. There were statistically significant differences between scores at different pelvic sites, with the levator ani showing the lowest scores. Reliability was heterogeneous among pelvic sites, varying from poor to excellent.

Conclusions

Pain upon palpation of the pelvic floor muscle in asymptomatic, nulliparous women should be considered an uncommon finding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tu F, As-Sanie S, Steege J (2006) Prevalence of pelvic musculoskeletal disorders in a female chronic pain clinic. J Reprod Med 51:185–189

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fitzgerald CM, Neville C, Mallinson C, Badillo S, Hynes C, Tu F (2011) Pelvic floor muscle examination in female chronic pelvic pain. J Reprod Med 56:117–122

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Messelink B, Benson T, Berghmans B et al (2005) Standardisation of terminology of Pelvic Floor Clinical Assessment Group of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 24:374–380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Boyajian-O’Neill L, McClain R, Coleman M, Thomas P (2008) Diagnosis and management of piriformis syndrome: an osteopathic approach. J Am Osteopath Assoc 108:657–664

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Collins S, Moore R, Mc Quay H (1997) The visual analogue pain intensity scale: what is moderate pain in millimetres? Pain 72:95–97

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Shrout P, Fleiss J (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86:420–428

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Montenegro M, Mateus-Vasconcelos E, Silva J, Nogueira A, Dos Reis F, Neto O (2010) Importance of pelvic muscle tenderness evaluation in women with chronic pelvic pain. Pain Med 11:224–228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tu F, Holt J, Gonzales J, Fitzgerald C (2008) Physical therapy evaluation of patients with chronic pelvic pain: a controlled study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 198:272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Littman G, Walker B, Schneider B (1985) Reassessment of verbal and visual analogue ratings in analgesic studies. Clin Pharmacol Ther 38:16–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lucas N, Macaskill P, Irwig L, Moran R, Bogduk N (2009) Reliability of physical examination for diagnosis of myofascial trigger points: a systematic review of the literature. Clin J Pain 25:80–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bo K, Finckenhagen H (2001) Vaginal palpation of pelvic floor muscle strength: inter-test reproducibility and comparison between palpation and vaginal squeeze pressure. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 80:883–887

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Slieker-ten M, Pool-Goudzward A, Eijkmans M, Steegers-Theunissen R, Burger C, Vierhout M (2009) Face validity and reliability of the first digital assessment scheme of pelvic floor muscle function conform of the new standardised terminology of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 28:295–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Oyama I, Lukban J, Fletscher E, Kellogg-Spadt S, Holzberg A, Whitmore K (2004) Modified Thiele massage as therapeutic intervention for female patients with interstitial cystitis and high-tone pelvic floor dysfunction. Urology 64:862–865

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Seth A, Teichman J (2008) Differences in the clinical presentation of interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome in patients with or without sexual abuse history. J Urol 180:20–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Ms Angela Frotzler, Biostatistician from the Swiss Paraplegic Centre, for her voluntary and substantial help with the statistical analysis of the data.

Conflicts of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tilemachos Kavvadias.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kavvadias, T., Pelikan, S., Roth, P. et al. Pelvic floor muscle tenderness in asymptomatic, nulliparous women: topographical distribution and reliability of a visual analogue scale. Int Urogynecol J 24, 281–286 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1837-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1837-5

Keywords

Navigation