Abstract
The objective of this study was to measure the length of episiotomy or spontaneous posterior perineal laceration and their relationship to perineal measurements and obstetric variables. The length of the perineum and genital hiatus and vertical length of episiotomy or posterior perineal tears were measured in 114 consecutive parturients with spontaneous singleton term deliveries. Seventy-four (65%) women underwent episiotomy while 40 (35%) sustained spontaneous posterior tears. Perineal or genital hiatus length was significantly correlated to episiotomy (r=0.34, p=0.003) or laceration (r=0.37, p=0.02) length, respectively. This association was significant (p=0.001) in a generalized linear model with duration of second stage of labor (p=0.005), degree of tear (p=0), and parity (p=0). Perineal length was significantly related to maternal age (p=0.036) and weight (p=0.037) and hiatal length (p=0). Short perineum and genital hiatus, long second stage of labor, and low parity are associated with longer posterior perineal injury.
References
Richter HE, Brumfield CG, Cliver SP, Burgio KL, Neely CL, Varner RE (2002) Risk factors associated with anal sphincter tear: a comparison of primiparous patients, vaginal births after cesarean deliveries, and patients with previous vaginal delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 187:1194–1198
Handa VL, Danielsen BH, Gilbert WM (2001) Obstetric anal sphincter lacerations. Obstet Gynecol 95:225–230
Nager CW, Helliwell JP (2001) Episiotomy increases perineal laceration length in primiparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185:444–450
Signorello LB, Harlow BL, Chekos AK, Repke JT (2000) Midline episiotomy and anal incontinence: retrospective cohort study. BMJ 320:86–90
Christianson LM, Bovbjerg VE, McDavitt EC, Hullfish KL (2003) Risk factors for perineal injury during delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189:255–260
de Leeuw JW, Struijk PC, Vierhout ME, Wallenburg HC (2001) Risk factors for third degree perineal ruptures during delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 108:383–387
Pinta TM, Kylanpaa ML, Salmi TK, Teramo KA, Luukkonen PS (2004) Primary sphincter repair: are the results of the operation good enough? Dis Colon Rectum 47:18–23
de Parades V, Etienney I, Thabut D, Beaulieu S, Tawk M, Assemekang B et al (2004) Anal sphincter injury after forceps delivery: myth or reality? A prospective ultrasound study of 93 females. Dis Colon Rectum 47:24–34
Fleming N, Newton ER, Roberts J (2003) Changes in postpartum perineal muscle function in women with and without episiotomies. J Midwifery Womens Health 48:53–59
Cleary-Goldman J, Robinson JN (2003) The role of episiotomy in current obstetric practice. Semin Perinatol 27:3–12
Howard D, Davies PS, Delancey JOL, Small Y (2000) Differences in perineal lacerations in black and white primiparas. Obstet Gynecol 96:622–624
Fenner DE, Genberg B, Brahma P, Marek L, DeLancey JO (2003) Fecal and urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery with anal sphincter disruption in an obstetrics unit in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189:1543–1549
Klein MC, Gauther RJ, Robbins JM, Kaczorowski J, Jorgensen SH, Franco ED et al (1994) Relationship of episiotomy to perineal trauma and morbidity, sexual dysfunction, and pelvic floor relaxation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 171:591–598
Woolley RJ (1995) Benefits and risks of episiotomy: a review of the English-language literature since 1980. Obstet Gynecol Surv 50:806–835
Thaker SB, Banta HD (1983) Benefits and risks of episiotomy: an interpretative review of the English language literature, 1860–1980. Obstet Gynecol Surv 38:322–338
Lede RL, Belizan JM, Carroli G (1996) Is routine use of episiotomy justified? Am J Obstet Gynecol 174:1399–1402
Eason E, Labrecque M, Wells G, Feldman P (2000) Preventing perineal trauma during childbirth: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 95:464–471
Carroli G, Belizan J (2003) Episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev (3):CD000081
Angioli R, Gomez-Marin O, Cantuaria G, O’sullivan MJ (2000) Severe perineal lacerations during vaginal delivery: the University of Miami experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182:1083–1085
Goldberg J, Hyslop T, Tolosa JE, Sultana C (2003) Racial differences in severe perineal lacerations after vaginal delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188:1063–1067
Riskin-Mashiah S, O’Brian SE, Wilkins IA (2002) Risk factors for severe perineal tear: can we do better? Am J Perinatol 19:225–234
Bodner-Adler B, Bodner K, Kaider A, Wagenbichler P, Leodolter S, Husslein P et al (2001) Risk factors for third-degree perineal tears in vaginal delivery, with an analysis of episiotomy types. J Reprod Med 46:752–756
Poen AC, Felt-Bersma RJ, Dekker GA, Deville W, Cuesta MA, Meuwissen SG (1997) Third degree obstetric perineal tears: risk factors and the preventive role of mediolateral episiotomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104:563–566
Sartore A, De Seta F, Maso G, Pregazzi R, Grimaldi E, Guaschino S (2004) The effects of mediolateral episiotomy on pelvic floor function after vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 103:669–673
Rizk DE, Thomas L (2000) Relationship between the length of the perineum and position of the anus and vaginal delivery in primigravidae. Int Urogynecol J 11:79–83
Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P et al (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:10–17
Cundiff GW, Harris RL, Coates K, Low VHS, Bump RC, Addison WE (1997) Abdominal sacral colpoperineopexy: a new approach for correction of posterior compartment defects and perineal descent associated with vaginal vault prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 177:1345–1355
Delancey JO, Hurd WW (1998) Size of the urogenital hiatus in the levator ani muscles in normal women and women with pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 91:364–368
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Professor M. Ezimokhai for critical review of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rizk, D.E.E., Abadir, M.N., Thomas, L.B. et al. Determinants of the length of episiotomy or spontaneous posterior perineal lacerations during vaginal birth. Int Urogynecol J 16, 395–400 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-004-1273-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-004-1273-2