Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Firm growth and R&D: Evidence from the Portuguese manufacturing industry

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Journal of Evolutionary Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work studies the effects of R&D activities and investment, both physical and R&D, on the growth of firms by considering a dynamic firm growth model with serial correlation. The main hypotheses maintain that firms with a strong commitment to R&D have a higher growth rate, and investment has a positive effect on firm growth. We investigate such relations with reference to an unbalanced panel data set of Portuguese manufacturing firms over the period of 1990 to 2001. We find that a systematic tendency for smaller firms to grow more quickly is the main reason why firm growth is not entirely stochastic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See for example Singh and Whittington (1975), Chesher (1979), Kumar (1985), Wagner (1992), Dunne and Hughes (1994), Tschoegl (1996), Hart and Oulton (1998), Almus and Nerlinger (2000), Vander Vennet (2001), Goddard et al (2002) and Audretsch et al. (2004).

  2. Although a more efficient two-step GMM estimator is available, the asymptotic standard errors for the two-step estimator can be an unreliable guide for inference in finite samples. The system GMM estimates that we report are computed using DPD for OX (see Doornik, Arellano, and Bond, 2002).

References

  • Acs ZJ, Audretsch DB (1990) Innovation and small firms. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Almus M, Nerlinger E (1999) Growth of new technology-based firms: which factors matter? Small Bus Econ 13:141–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almus M, Nerlinger E (2000) Testing Gibrat’s Law for young firms: empirical results for West Germany. Small Bus Econ 15:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev Econ Stud 58:277–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch D (1995) Innovation and industry evolution. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch D, Coad A (2014) Firm growth and innovation. Small Bus Econ 43(4):743–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blundell R, Bond S (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models”. J Econ 87:115–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bottazzi G, Dosi G, Lippi M, Pammolli F, Riccaboni M (2001) Innovation and corporate growth in the evolution of drug industry”. Int J Ind Organ 19:1161–1187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cefis E, Orsenigo L (2001) The persistence of innovative activities: a cross-countries and cross-sectors comparative analysis. Res Policy 30:1139–1158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cesaratto S, Stirati A (1996) The economic consequences of innovations in italian manufacturing firms: theory and explorative results from the community innovation survey”. Stud Econ 51:67–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesher A (1979) Testing the law of proportionate effect. J Ind Econ 27:403–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coad A (2009) The growth of firms: a survey of theories and empirical evidence. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd

  • Coad A, Rao R (2008) Innovation and firm growth in ‘complex technology’ sectors: a quantile regression approach. Res Policy 37(4):633–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coad A, Rao R (2010a) R&D and firm growth rate variance. Econ Bull 30(1):702–708

    Google Scholar 

  • Coad A, Rao R (2010b) Firm growth and R&D expenditure. Econ Innov New Technol 19(2):127–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coad A, Rao R (2011) The firm-level employment effects of innovations in high-tech US manufacturing industries. J Evol Econ 21(2):255–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen WM, Klepper S (1996) A reprise of size and R&D. Econ J 106:925–951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Contini B, Revelli R (1989) The relationship between firm growth and labour demand. Small Bus Econ 1:309–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Monte A, Papagni E (2003) R&D and the growth of firms: empirical analysis of a panel of Italian firms. Res Policy 32:1003–1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirel P, Mazzucato M (2012) Innovation and firm growth: Is R&D worth it? Ind Innov 12(1):45–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deschryvere M (2014) R&D, firm growth and the role of innovation persistence: analysis of Finnish SMEs and large firms. Small Bus Econ. doi:10.1007/s11187-014-9559-3

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi G (1982) Technological paradigms and tecnological trajectories. Res Policy 11(3):147–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dosi G, Marsili O, Orsenigo L, Salvatore R (1995) Learning, market selection and the evolution of industrial structures. Small Bus Econ 7:411–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dosi G, Malerba F, Marsili O, Orsenigo L (1997) Industrial structures and dynamics: evidence, interpretations and puzzles”. Ind Corp Chang 6:3–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunne P, Hughes A (1994) Age, Size, growth and survival: UK companies in the 1980’s. J Ind Econ 42:115–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans D (1987) Tests of alternative theories of firm growth. J Polit Econ 95:657–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geroski PA (1998) An applied econometrician’s view of large company performance. Rev Ind Organ 13:271–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geroski P (2000) The growth of firms in theory and practice. In: Foss N, Mahnke V (eds) Competence, governance and entrepreneurship. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 168–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Geroski P, Mazzucato M (2002) Learning and the sources of corporate growth. Ind Corp Chang 11:623–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geroski P, Machin S, Walters C (1997) Corporate and profitability. J Ind Econ 45:171–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibrat R (1931) Les inégalités economiques”. Sirey, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodard J, Wilson J, Blandon P (2002) Panel tests of Gibrat’s law for Japanese manufacturing. Int J Ind Organ 20(3):415–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall B (1987) The relationship between firm size and firm growth in the US manufacturing sector. J Ind Econ 35(4):583–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart P (2000) Theories of firms’ growth and the generation of jobs. Rev Ind Organ 17(3):229–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart P, Oulton N (1998) Job Generation in the UK Corporate Sector, 1986-95. National Institute of Economic and Social Research Discussion Paper N° 139

  • Heshmati A (2001) On the growth of micro and small firms: evidence from Sweden. Small Bus Econ 17:213–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hölzl W (2009) Is the R&D behaviour of fast-growing SMEs different? evidence from CIS III data for 16 countries. Small Bus Econ 33(1):59–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar M (1985) Growth, acquisition activity and firm size: evidence from the UK. J Ind Econ 33:327–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loof H, Heshmati A (2006) On the relationship between innovation and performance: a sensitivity analysis. Econ Innov New Technol 15:317–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson R, Winter S (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose E (1980) The theory of the growth of the firm. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter J (1934) The theory of economic development. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick

    Google Scholar 

  • Segarra A, Teruel M (2014) High-growth firms and innovation: an empirical analysis for Spanish firms. Small Bus Econ. doi:10.1007/s11187-014-9563-7

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh A, Whittington G (1975) The size and growth of firms. Rev Econ Stud 42:15–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stam E, Wennberg K (2009) The roles of R&D in new firm growth”. Small Bus Econ 33(1):77–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triguero A, Cuerva M, Córcoles D (2014) Persistence of innovation and firm’s growth: evidence from a panel of SME and large Spanish manufacturing firms. Small Bus Econ. doi:10.1007/s11187-014-9562-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschoegl A (1996) Managerial (dis)economies of scale: the case of regional banks in Japan. Reginald H. Jones Centre for Management Policy Strategy and Organization, University of Pennsylvania, WP 96-04

  • Vander Vennet R (2001) The law of proportionate effect and OECD bank sectors. Appl Econ 33:539–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verspagen B (2004) Innovation and economic growth. In: Fagerberg J, Mowery DC, Nelson RR (eds) The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 487–513

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner J (1992) Firm size, growth and persistence of chance. Small Bus Econ 4:125–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yasuda T (2005) Firm growth, size, age and behavior in Japanese manufacturing. Small Bus Econ 24(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of “Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia” (FCT – Portugal), through the research project reference n°: FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-009960 - reference FCT n° PTDC/EGE-ECO/108586/2008.

We also gratefully acknowledge the valuable comments of the participants of 4th European Meeting on Applied Evolutionary Economics (Utrecht, 2005), the editor and two anonymous reviewers for their help in improving this paper.

All errors and omissions remain our own responsibility.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Blandina Oliveira.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oliveira, B., Fortunato, A. Firm growth and R&D: Evidence from the Portuguese manufacturing industry. J Evol Econ 27, 613–627 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-016-0487-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-016-0487-z

Keywords

JEL classification

Navigation