Skip to main content
Log in

Persistence vs. mobility in industrial and technological specialisations: evidence from 11 Euro area countries

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Journal of Evolutionary Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the evolution of the patterns of specialisation of 11 Euro area countries in the period 1990–2008, by analysing their comparative and technological advantages. We estimate conditional densities and Markov transition probabilities to examine both the external shape of the distribution of technological and comparative advantages and the intra-distribution dynamics. Our results point out that there is, on average, high persistence of the industrial specialisation patterns of the 11 Euro area countries under scrutiny, confirming a lock-in effect, especially in the case of Italy. Our results for technological specialisation reveal high mobility of technological advantages over the same period, especially for Spain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Austria, the Belgium-Luxembourg Economic Union (BLEU), Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Portugal and Spain.

  2. In order to reduce the impact of outliers and the impact of wide variation in exchange rate or prices, we exclude the ’Crude oil and natural’ and ’Ores of uranium and thorium’ sectors.

  3. For Greece and Portugal, we can only estimate three-by-three matrices for the STCA index due to their patent applications being concentrated in the first tertile.

  4. See Appendix.

References

  • Alessandrini M, Fattouh B, Scaramozzino P (2007) The changing pattern of foreign trade specialisation in Indian manufacturing. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 23(2):270–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alessandrini M, Batuo ME (2010) The trade specialisation of SANE: Evidence from manufacturing industries. Eur J Comp Econ 7(1):145–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez F, Lucas RE (2007) General equilibrium analysis of the Eaton? Kortum model of international trade. J Monet Econ 54(6):1726–1768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amador J, Cabral S, Maria JR (2010) What can we learn from the distribution of trade patterns? Evidence for Portugal, Spain, Greece and Ireland. Port Econ J 9(2):77–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amemiya T (1984) Tobit models: a survey. J Econom 24(1–2):3–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amendola G, Guerriri P, Padoan PC (1992) International patterns of technological accumulation. J Int Comp Econ 1:173–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur WB (1989) Competing technologies, increasing returns and lock-in by historical events. Econ J 99(394):116–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur WB (1994) Increasing returns and path dependence in the economy. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Balassa B (1965) Trade liberalization and revealed comparative advantage. Manchester School Econ Soc Stud 33(2):99–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brasili A, Epifani P, Helg R (2000) On the dynamics of trade patterns. De Economist 148(2):233–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulli S (2001) Distribution dynamics and cross-country convergence: a new approach. Scott J Polit Econ 48(2): 226–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadot O, Carrére C, Strass-Kahn V (2011) Export diversification: What’s behind the hump? Rev Econ Stat 93(2):590–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell J (1989) Technological innovation and multinational corporations. Blackwell Publisher, Oxford

  • Chiappini R (2011a) Dynamique des spécialisations et performances commerciales des Pays d’Europe Centrale et Orientale. Revue d’Etudes Comparatives Est-Ouest 42(2):165–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiappini R (2011b) Comment mesurer la compétitivité structurelle des pays dans les équations d’exportation? L’Actualité économique 87(1):31–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalum B, Laursen K, Villumsen G (1998) Structural change in OECD export specialisation patterns: de-specialisation and stickiness. Int Rev Appl Econ 12(3):423–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David PA (1986) Understanding the economics of QWERTY: the necessity of history. In: Parker WN (ed) Economic history and the modern economist. Oxford, Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  • De Benedictis L, Tamberi M (2004) Overall specialisation empirics: techniques and applications. Open Econ Rev 15(4):323–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deardorff AV (1974) Factor proportions and comparative advantage in the long run: comments. J Polit Econ 82(4):829–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dornbusch R, Fischer S, Samuelson P (1977) Comparative advantage, trade and payments in a Ricardian model with a continuum of goods. Am Econ Rev 67(1):823–839

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi G (1988) Sources, procedures and microeconomic effects of innovation. J Econ Lit 26(3):1120–1171

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton J, Kortum S (2002) Technology, geography and trade. Econometrica 70(5):1741–1779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ethier WJ (1979) Internationally decreasing costs and world trade. J Int Econ 9(1):1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ethier WJ (1982) National and international returns to scale in the modern theory of international trade. Am Econ Rev 72(3):389–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Findlay R (1970) Factor proportions and comparative advantage in the long run. J Polit Econ 78(1):27–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujita M, Krugman P, Venables A (2001) The spatial economy: cities, regions and international trade. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hidalgo CA, Klinger B, Barabási A-L, Hausman R (2007) The product space conditions the development of nations. Sci 317(5837):482–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman GM, Helpman E (1990) Comparative advantage and long-run growth. Am Econ Rev 80(4):796–815

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman GM, Helpman E (1991) Innovation and growth in the global economy. MIT Press, Cambridge

  • Hall P, Racine JS, Li Q (2004) Cross-validation and the estimation of conditional probability densities. J Am Stat Assoc 99(468):1015–1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausman R, Hwang J, Rodrik D (2007) What you exports matters. J Econ Growth 12(1):1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayfield T, Racine JS (2008) Nonparametric econometrics: the np package. J Stat Soft 27(5):1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Helpman E (1981) International trade in the presence of product differentiation, economies of scale and imperfect competition: a Chamberlain-Heckscher-Ohlin approach. J Int Econ 11(3):305–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helpman E, Krugman P (1985) Market structure and foreign trade: Increasing returns imperfect competition and the international economy. MIT Press, Cambridge

  • Hyndman RJ, Bashtannyk DM, Grunwald GK (1996) Estimating and visualizing conditional densities. J Comput Graph Stat 5(4):315–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyndman RJ, Einbeck J (2009) The hdrce package (highest density regions and conditional density estimation). R package version 2.09

  • Krugman P (1987) The narrow moving band, the Dutch disease and the competitive consequences of Mrs Thatcher: notes on trade in the presence of scale economies. J Dev Econ 27(1-2):41–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman P (1991) Geography and trade. MIT Press, Cambridge

  • Lall S (2000) The technological structure and performance of developing country manufactured exports, 1985-98. Oxf Dev Stud 28(3):337–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lallement R, Mouhoud EM, Paillard S (2002) Polarisation et internationalisation des activités d’innovation: incidences sur la spécialisation technologique des nations. Région et Développement 16:17–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas R (1988) On the mechanics of economic development. J Monet Econ 22(1):3–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mancusi ML (2001) Technological specialisation in industrial countries. Rev World Econ (Weltwirschaftliches Archiv) 137(4):593–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mancusi ML (2012) National externalities and path-dependence in technological change: an empirical test. Econ 79(314):329–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Markusen JR, Melvin JR (1981) Trade, factor prices, and the gains from trade with increasing returns to scale. Can J Econ 14(3):450–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narula R, Wakelin K (1998) Technological competitiveness, trade and foreign direct investment. Struct Change Econ Dyn 9(3):373–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patel P, Pavitt K (1991) Large firms in the production of the world’s technology: an important case of non-globalisation. J Int Bus Stud 22(1):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt K (1989) International patterns of technological accumulation. In: Hood N, Vahlne J-E (eds) Strategies in global competition. Croom Helm Publisher, London, pp 126–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Proudman J, Redding S (2000) Evolving patterns of international trade. Rev Int Econ 8(3):373–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quah DT (1993) Empirical cross-section dynamics in economic growth. Eur Econ Rev 37(2–3):426–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quah DT (1996) Empirics for economic growth and convergence. Eur Econ Rev 40(6):1353–1375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quah DT (1997) Empirics for economic growth and distribution: stratification, polarization and convergence clubs. J Econ Growth 2(1):27–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redding S (2002) Specialisation dynamics. J Int Econ 58(2):299–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricardo D (1817) On the principles of political economy and taxation, 3rd edn. (1821). John Murray, London

  • Schott P (2003) One size fits all? Heckscher-Ohlin specialization in global production. Am Econ Rev 93(3):686–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schott P (2004) Across product versus within-product specialization in international trade. Q J Econ 199(2):647–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shorrocks A (1978) The measurement of mobility. Econometrica 46(5):1013–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soete LLG (1981) A general test of the technological gap trade theory. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 117(4):638–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uchida Y, Cook P (2005) The transformation of competitive advantage in East Asia: an analysis of technological and trade specialisation. World Dev 33(5):701–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong K-Y (1995) International trade in goods and factor mobility. MIT Press, Cambridge

  • Xiang C (2007) Diversification cones, trade costs and factor market linkages. J Int Econ 71(2):448–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young A (1991) Learning-by-doing and dynamic effects of international trade. Q J Econ 106(2):396–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaghini A (2005) Evolution of trade patterns in the new EU member States. Econ Trans 13(4):629–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I am deeply indebted to one anonymous referee for valuable and helpful comments and suggestions. The usual disclaimers apply.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raphaël Chiappini.

Appendix

Appendix

Fig. 1
figure 1

Stacked density and HDR (SBI-18-year transitions)

Fig. 2
figure 2

Stacked density and HDR (STCA-18-year transitions)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chiappini, R. Persistence vs. mobility in industrial and technological specialisations: evidence from 11 Euro area countries. J Evol Econ 24, 159–187 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-013-0331-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-013-0331-7

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation