Skip to main content
Log in

Ionospheric error contribution to GNSS single-frequency navigation at the 2014 solar maximum

Journal of Geodesy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For single-frequency users of the global satellite navigation system (GNSS), one of the main error contributors is the ionospheric delay, which impacts the received signals. As is well-known, GPS and Galileo transmit global models to correct the ionospheric delay, while the international GNSS service (IGS) computes precise post-process global ionospheric maps (GIM) that are considered reference ionospheres. Moreover, accurate ionospheric maps have been recently introduced, which allow for the fast convergence of the real-time precise point position (PPP) globally. Therefore, testing of the ionospheric models is a key issue for code-based single-frequency users, which constitute the main user segment. Therefore, the testing proposed in this paper is straightforward and uses the PPP modeling applied to single- and dual-frequency code observations worldwide for 2014. The usage of PPP modeling allows us to quantify—for dual-frequency users—the degradation of the navigation solutions caused by noise and multipath with respect to the different ionospheric modeling solutions, and allows us, in turn, to obtain an independent assessment of the ionospheric models. Compared to the dual-frequency solutions, the GPS and Galileo ionospheric models present worse global performance, with horizontal root mean square (RMS) differences of 1.04 and 0.49 m and vertical RMS differences of 0.83 and 0.40 m, respectively. While very precise global ionospheric models can improve the dual-frequency solution globally, resulting in a horizontal RMS difference of 0.60 m and a vertical RMS difference of 0.74 m, they exhibit a strong dependence on the geographical location and ionospheric activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Current IGS Site Guidelines; revised July 2015 (http://kb.igs.org/hc/en-us/articles/202011433-Current-IGS-Site-Guidelines). Pseudo-range and carrier phase smoothing should be completely disabled. (Guideline no. 2.2.18).

References

  • Davies K (1990) Ionospheric radio. Institution of Electrical Engineers, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dow JM, Neilan RE, Rizos C (2009) The International GNSS Service in a changing landscape of Global Navigation Satellite Systems. J Geodesy 83:191–198. doi:10.1007/s00190-008-0300-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European GNSS (Galileo) Open Service (2015) Ionospheric correction algorithm for Galileo single frequency users. European Commission. doi:10.2873/685913

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-Pajares M, Prieto-Cerdeira R, Béniguel Y, Garcia-Rigo A, Kinrade J, Kauristie K, Orus-Perez R, Schlueter S, Serant D, Nava B, Krankowski A, Secretan H, Sampedro R, Prats X (2015) MONITOR ionospheric monitoring system: analysis of perturbed days affecting SBAS performance. In: ION PNT 2015. Hawaii

  • Hernandez-Pajares M, Sanz JM, Orus R, Garcia-Rigo A, Feltens J, Komjathy A, Schaer SC, Krankowski A (2008) The IGS VTEC maps: a reliable source of ionospheric information since 1998. J Geod 83(3):263–275. doi:10.1007/s00190-008-0266-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoque MM, Jakowski N, Berdermann J (2015) An ionosphere broadcast model for next generation GNSS. In: ION 2015, Florida

  • Jensen ABO, Mitchell C (2011) GNSS and Ionosphere: what’s in store for the next solar maximum? GPS World, pp 40–48. http://gpsworld.com/innovation-gnss-and-ionosphere-11036/

  • Klobuchar J (1987) Ionospheric time delay algorithm or single-frequency GPS users. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 23(3):332

    Google Scholar 

  • Montenbruck O, Steigenberger P, Khachikyan R, Weber G, Langley RB, Mervart L, Hugentobler U (2014) IGS-MGEX: Preparing the Ground for Multi-Constellation GNSS Science. Inside GNSS 9(1):42–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Orus R, Hernandez-Pajares M, Juan M, Sanz J, Garcia-Fernandez M (2002) Performance of different TEC models to provide GPS ionospheric corrections. J Atmos Solar Terr Phys 64:2055–2062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orus R, Hernández-Pajares M, Juan JM, Sanz J (2005) Improvement of global ionospheric VTEC maps by using Kriging interpolation technique. J Atmos Solar Terr Phys 67(16):1598–1609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson BW, Spilker JJ Jr (1996) Global positioning system: theory and applications. Progress in astronautics and aeronautics, vol 163–164. American Institute for Aeronautics and Astronautics, Washington, DC

  • Rovira-Garcia A, Juan J, Sanz J, Gonzalez-Casado G (2015) A worldwide ionospheric model for fast precise point positioning. Geosci Remote Sens IEEE Trans 53(8):4596–4604. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2015.2402598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rovira-Garcia A, Juan JM, Sanz J, Gonzalez-Casado G, Ibanez D (2016) Accuracy of ionospheric models used in GNSS and SBAS: methodology and analysis. J Geod 60(3):229–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanz Subirana J, Juan Zornoza JM, Hernández-Pajares M (2013) GNSS data processing, Vol. I: fundamentals and algorithms (ESA TM-23/1). European Space Agency, ISBN 978-92-9221-886-7

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author acknowledges the use of MGEX data, precise orbits, clocks and GIM products from IGS and the use of gAGE/UPC precise GIM. The author also acknowledges the use of GMT tools.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raul Orus Perez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Orus Perez, R. Ionospheric error contribution to GNSS single-frequency navigation at the 2014 solar maximum. J Geod 91, 397–407 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-016-0971-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-016-0971-0

Keywords

Navigation