Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Reliable estimation of orbit errors in spaceborne SAR interferometry

The network approach

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Geodesy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An approach to improve orbital state vectors by orbit error estimates derived from residual phase patterns in synthetic aperture radar interferograms is presented. For individual interferograms, an error representation by two parameters is motivated: the baseline error in cross-range and the rate of change of the baseline error in range. For their estimation, two alternatives are proposed: a least squares approach that requires prior unwrapping and a less reliable gridsearch method handling the wrapped phase. In both cases, reliability is enhanced by mutual control of error estimates in an overdetermined network of linearly dependent interferometric combinations of images. Thus, systematic biases, e.g., due to unwrapping errors, can be detected and iteratively eliminated. Regularising the solution by a minimum-norm condition results in quasi-absolute orbit errors that refer to particular images. For the 31 images of a sample ENVISAT dataset, orbit corrections with a mutual consistency on the millimetre level have been inferred from 163 interferograms. The method itself qualifies by reliability and rigorous geometric modelling of the orbital error signal but does not consider interfering large scale deformation effects. However, a separation may be feasible in a combined processing with persistent scatterer approaches or by temporal filtering of the estimates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baarda W (1968) A testing procedure for use in geodetic networks, vol 9. NCG Publications on Geodesy, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  • Bähr H, Hanssen RF (2010) Network adjustment of orbit errors in SAR interferometry. In: Lacoste-Francis H (ed) Proceedings of ‘Fringe 2009’, Frascati, Italy, 30 Nov–4 Dec 2009. ESA conference proceedings, vol SP-677

  • Biggs J, Wright T, Lu Z, Parsons B (2007) Multi-interferogram method for measuring interseismic deformation: Denali Fault, Alaska. Geophys J Int 170(3): 1165–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bing C, Shaojian X, Ping Z (2006) Estimation of InSAR baseline based on the frequency shift theory. In: Shunjun W (ed) Proceedings of the 2006 CIE international conference on radar, Shanghai, China, 16–19 Oct 2006

  • Chen CW, Zebker HA (2001) Two-dimensional phase unwrapping with use of statistical models for cost functions in nonlinear optimization. J Opt Soc Am A 18(2): 338–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doornbos E, Scharroo R (2005) Improved ERS and ENVISAT precise orbit determination. In: Lacoste H, Ouwehand L (eds) Proceedings of the 2004 ENVISAT & ERS symposium, Salzburg, Austria, 6–10 Sep 2004. ESA conference proceedings, vol SP-572

  • European Space Agency (2007) Information on ALOS PALSAR products for ADEN users. ESA technical note

  • Ferretti A, Prati C, Rocca F (2001) Permanent scatterers in SAR interferometry. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 39(1): 8–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein RM, Werner CL (1998) Radar interferogram filtering for geophysical applications. Geophys Res Lett 25(21): 4035–4038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanssen RF (2001) Radar interferometry—data interpretation and error analysis. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Heck B (1981) Der Einfluß einzelner Beobachtungen auf das Ergebnis einer Ausgleichung und die Suche nach Ausreißern in den Beobachtungen. Allg Vermess-Nachr 88(1): 17–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper AJ, Segall P, Zebker HA (2007) Persistent scatterer interferometric synthetic aperture radar for crustal deformation analysis, with application to Volcan Alcedo, Galápagos. J Geophys Res 112: B07407. doi:10.1029/2006JB004763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jäger R, Müller T, Saler H, Schwäble R (2006) Klassische und robuste Ausgleichungsverfahren. Wichmann, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Kampes BM, Hanssen RF, Perski Z (2004) Radar interferometry with public domain tools. In: Lacoste H (ed) Proceedings of Fringe 2003 workshop, Frascati, Italy, 1–5 Dec 2003. ESA conference proceedings, vol SP-550

  • Ketelaar VBH (2009) Satellite radar interferometry—subsidence monitoring techniques. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Koch KR (1999) Parameter estimation and hypothesis testing in linear models, 3rd edn. Dümmler, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlhase AO, Feigl KL, Massonnet D (2003) Applying differential InSAR to orbital dynamics: a new approach for estimating ERS trajectories. J Geod 77(9): 493–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreyszig E (1979) Statistische Methoden und ihre Anwendungen, 7th edn. Vandenhoek & Ruprecht, Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundgren P, Hetland EA, Liu Z, Fielding EJ (2009) Southern San Andreas-San Jacinto fault system slip rates estimated from earthquake cycle models constrained by GPS and interferometric synthetic aperture radar observations. J Geophys Res 114: B02403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massonnet D, Feigl KL (1998) Radar interferometry and its applications to changes in the earth’s surface. Rev Geophys 36(4): 441–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monti Guarnieri A, Biancardi P, D’Aria D, Rocca F (2000) Accurate and robust baseline estimation. In: Proceedings of Fringe ’99, Liège, Belgium, 10–12 Nov 1999. ESA conference proceedings, vol SP-478

  • Nakamura R, Nakamura S, Kudo N, Katagiri S (2007) Precise orbit determination for ALOS. In: 20th International symposium on space flight dynamics, Annapolis, USA, 24–28 Sep 2007

  • Otten M, Dow JM (2005) ENVISAT precise orbit determination. In: Lacoste H, Ouwehand L (eds) Proceedings of the 2004 ENVISAT & ERS Symposium, Salzburg, Austria, 6–10 Sep 2004

  • Pope AJ (1976) The statistics of residuals and the detection of outliers. NOAA technical report no. 65 NGS 1, US Department of Commerce, Rockville, MD, USA

  • Scharroo R, Visser PNAM (1998) Precise orbit determination and gravity field improvement for the ERS satellites. J Geophys Res 103(C4): 8113–8127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh K, Stussi N, Keong KL, Hock L (1997) Baseline estimation in interferometric SAR. In: Stein TI (ed) Proceedings of the 1997 international geoscience and remote sensing symposium, IGARSS ’97, Singapore, 3–8 Aug 1997

  • Small D, Werner CL, Nüesch D (1993) Baseline modelling for ERS-1 SAR interferometry. In: Proceedings of the 1993 international geoscience and remote sensing symposium, IGARSS ’93: better understanding of Earth environment, Tokyo, Japan, 18–21 Aug 1993, pp 1204–1206

  • Teunissen PJG (2000) Adjustment theory. Delft University Press, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner CL, Hensley S, Goldstein RM, Rosen PA, Zebker HA (1993) Techniques and applications of SAR interferometry for ERS-1: topography, change detection and slope measurement. In: Kaldeich B (ed) Proceedings of the first ERS-1 symposium: space at the service of our environment, Cannes, France, 4–6 Nov 1992, pp 205–210

  • Yoon YT, Eineder M, Yague-Martinez N, Montenbruck O (2009) TerraSAR-X precise trajectory estimation and quality assessment. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 47(6): 1859–1868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang K, Ng AHM, Li X, Chang HC, Ge L, Rizos C (2009) A new approach to improve the accuracy of baseline estimation for spaceborne radar interferometry. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international geoscience and remote sensing symposium, Cape Town, South Africa, 12–17 July 2009

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hermann Bähr.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bähr, H., Hanssen, R.F. Reliable estimation of orbit errors in spaceborne SAR interferometry. J Geod 86, 1147–1164 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-012-0571-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-012-0571-6

Keywords

Navigation