Abstract
Cost functions as the foundation of managerial decision making usually assume a linear cost function with fixed and variable costs. The latter are dominantly regarded as being identical for increasing and for decreasing activity levels. However, empirical research shows that the decline in costs is smaller for decreasing than the rise in costs for increasing activity levels for the same amount of change. This effect of asymmetric cost behaviour is called ‘cost stickiness’ or ‘cost remanence’. Our paper provides an overview of the causes and occurrences of cost stickiness. Furthermore, the empirical findings on cost stickiness using regression models with archival financial accounting data are reviewed and analysed. We explore different determinants of the effect of cost stickiness. A critical look at the findings and methods of empirical studies reveals the limitation of current research and opens new streams for further research. Finally, implications of the existence of sticky costs for management accounting research and practice are drawn.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, M. C., Banker, R. D., & Janakiraman, S. N. (2003). Are selling, general, and administrative costs ‘sticky’? Journal of Accounting Research, 41(1), 47–63.
Anderson, M., Banker, R., Huang, R., & Janakiraman, S. (2007). Cost behavior and fundamental analysis of SG &A Costs. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 22(1), 1–28.
Anderson, S. W., & Lanen W. N. (2009). Understanding Cost Management: What Can We Learn from the Evidence on ‘Sticky Costs’? Working Paper. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=975135 (Accessed 31 Jan 2013).
Balakrishnan, R., & Gruca, T. S. (2008). Cost Stickiness and Core Competency: A Note. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(4), 993–1006.
Balakrishnan, R., Labro, E., & Soderstrom, N. S. (2011). Cost Structure and Sticky Costs. Working Paper. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1562726 (Accessed 31 Jan 2013).
Balakrishnan, R., Petersen, M. J., & Soderstrom, N. S. (2004). Does capacity utilization affect the ‘stickiness’ of cost? Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 19(3), 283–299.
Banker, R. D., Byzalov, D., & Chen, L. (2013). Employment protection legislation, adjustment costs and cross-country differences in cost behaviour. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 55(1), 111–127.
Banker, R. D., Byzalov, D., Ciftci, M., & Mashruwala, R. (2012). The Moderating Effect of Prior Sales Changes on Asymmetric Cost Behavior. Working Paper. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=902546 (Accessed 31 Jan 2013).
Banker, R. D., Byzalov, D., & Plehn-Dujowich, J. (2011). Sticky Cost Behavior: Theory and Evidence. Working Paper. http://astro.temple.edu/~dbyzalov/sticky.pdf (Accessed 31 Jan 2013).
Banker, R. D., & Chen, L. (2006). Labor Market Characteristics and Cross-Country Differences in Cost Stickiness. Working Paper. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=921419 (Accessed 31 Jan 2013).
Baumgarten, D., Bonenkamp, U., & Homburg, C. (2010). The information content of the SG &A ratio. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 22(1), 1–22.
Bebchuk, L., Cohen, A., & Ferrell, A. (2009). What matters in corporate governance? Review of Financial Studies, 22(2), 783–827.
Brasch, H. (1927). Zur Praxis der Unkostenschwankungen und ihrer Erfassung (II) (The practice of cost fluctuation and their measurement). Betriebswirtschaftliche Rundschau, 1927(4), 65–73.
Calleja, K., Steliaros, M., & Thomas, D. C. (2006). A note on cost stickiness: Some international comparisons. Management Accounting Research, 17(2), 127–140.
Chen, C. X., Lu, H., & Sougiannis, T. (2012). The agency problem, corporate governance, and the asymmetrical behavior of selling, general, and administrative costs. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(1), 252–282.
Kama, I., & Weiss, D. (2010). Do Managers’ Deliberate Decisions Induce Sticky Costs? Working Paper. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1558953 (Accessed 31 Jan 2013).
Kama, I., & Weiss, D. (2013). Do earnings targets and managerial incentives affect sticky costs? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 51(1), 201–224.
Kilger, W., Pampel, J., & Vikas, K. (2012). Flexible Plankostenrechnung und Deckungsbeitragsrechnung (Flexible costing and marginal costing) (13th ed.). Wiesbaden: Gabler.
Mahlendorf, M. (2009). Sticky Cost Issues—Kostenremanenz bei Nachfrageschwankungen (Sticky cost issues—Cost remanence with demand variance). Controlling and Management, 53(3), 193–195.
Malagoli, M. (1985). Probleme der Kostenremanenz in Theorie und Praxix, Kritik und Ergänzung (Problems of cost remanence in theory and practice: Critique and extensions), Dissertation. Switzerland: University of St. Gallen.
Noreen, E., & Soderstrom, N. (1997). The accuracy of proportional cost models: Evidence from hospital service departments. Review of Accounting Studies, 2(1), 89–114.
Tondock, R. (2011). Kostenremanenz (cost remanence). Controlling and Management, 55(23), 361–363.
Weidenmier, M., & Subramaniam, C. (2003). Additional Evidence on the Sticky Behavior of Costs. Working Paper. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=369941 (Accessed 31 Jan 2013)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
See Table 1.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guenther, T.W., Riehl, A. & Rößler, R. Cost stickiness: state of the art of research and implications. J Manag Control 24, 301–318 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-013-0176-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-013-0176-0