Abstract
In this paper, a method for improving uncertainty estimates of embodied carbon and embodied energy is presented and discussed. Embodied energy and embodied carbon results are the focus of this analysis due to the fact that, at the conceptual design stage, these two are the most important quantities for decision making in life cycle assessment (LCA) studies. The use of renewable and new energy sources and the development of cleaner and more efficient energy technologies will play a major role in the sustainable development of a future energy strategy. Environmental protection, economic and social cohesion and diversification and security of energy supply are highlighted by the International Energy Agency as a high priority for the development of cleaner and more efficient energy systems and promotion of renewable energy sources. In the case studies presented, better results for the baseline turbine were observed compared to turbines with the proposed technology improvement opportunities. Embodied energy and embodied carbon results for the baseline turbine show an about 50 % probability that the turbine manufacturer may have lost the chance to reduce carbon emissions and 85 % probability that the turbine manufacturer may have lost the chance to reduce the primary energy consumed during its manufacture. The proposed approach is therefore a feasible alternative when more reliable results are desired for LCA-based design decision making.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
IEA (2009) Technology roadmap: wind energy. Available at http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/wind_roadmap.pdf (accessed on 26-07-2016)
IEA (2013) Technology roadmap: wind energy. Available at https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/Wind_2013_Roadmap.pdf (accessed on 26-07-2016)
Davidsson S, Höök M, Wall G (2012) A review of life cycle assessments on wind energy systems. The Int J Life Cycle Assess 17(6):729–742. doi:10.1007/s11367-012-0397-8
He B, Tang W, Wang J, Huang S, Deng Z, Wang Y (2015) Low-carbon conceptual design based on product life cycle assessment. The Int J Adv Manuf Technol 81(5–8):863–874. doi:10.1007/s00170-015-7253-5
Aso R, Cheung WM (2015) Towards greener horizontal-axis wind turbines: analysis of carbon emissions, energy and costs at the early design stage. J Clean Prod 87:263–274. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.020
Simons PJ, Cheung WM (2016) Development of a quantitative analysis system for greener and economically sustainable wind farms. J Clean Prod 133:886–898. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.030
Ardente F, Beccali M, Cellura M, Brano VL (2008) Energy performances and life cycle assessment of an Italian wind farm. Renew Sust Energ Rev 12(1):200–217. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2006.05.013
Rodríguez-Picón LA (2016) An uncertainty approach for optimization of production parameters—a case study in an extrusion molding process. The Int J Adv Manuf Technol:1–10. doi:10.1007/s00170-016-9358-x
Liu C, Li Y, Shen W (2014) Integrated manufacturing process planning and control based on intelligent agents and multi-dimension features. The Int J Adv Manuf Technol 75(9–12):1457–1471. doi:10.1007/s00170-014-6246-0
Chu W, Li Y, Liu C, Mou W, Tang L (2014) A manufacturing resource allocation method with knowledge-based fuzzy comprehensive evaluation for aircraft structural parts. Int J Prod Res 52(11):3239–3258. doi:10.1080/00207543.2013.869369
Li Y, Liu X, Gao JX, Maropoulos PG (2012) A dynamic feature information model for integrated manufacturing planning and optimization. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 61(1):167–170. doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2012.03.085
Maropoulos PG, Bramall DG, Chapman P, Cheung WM, McKay KR, Rogers BC (2006) Digital enterprise technology in production networks. The Int J Adv Manuf Technol 30(9–10):911–916. doi:10.1007/s00170-005-0063-4
Martínez E, Sanz F, Pellegrini S, Jiménez E, Blanco J (2009) Life-cycle assessment of a 2-MW rated power wind turbine: CML method. The Int J Life Cycle Asses 14(1):52–63. doi:10.1007/s11367-008-0033-9
Oebels KB, Pacca S (2013) Life cycle assessment of an onshore wind farm located at the northeastern coast of Brazil. Renew Energy 53:60–70. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2012.10.026
Hammond G, Jones C (2011) Inventory of carbon & energy version 2.0 (ICE V2. 0). Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Bath, Bath, UK
Lloyd SM, Ries R (2007) Characterizing, propagating, and analyzing uncertainty in life cycle assessment: a survey of quantitative approaches. J Ind Ecology 11(1):161–179. doi:10.1162/jiec.2007.1136
Sugiyama H, Fukushima Y, Hirao M, Hellweg S, Hungerbühler K (2005) Using standard statistics to consider uncertainty in industry-based life cycle inventory databases. The Int J Life Cycle Assess 10(6):399–405. doi:10.1065/lca2005.05.211
Wang E, Shen Z (2003) A hybrid data quality indicator and statistical method for improving uncertainty analysis in LCA of complex system: application to the whole-building embodied energy analysis. J Clean Prod 43:166–173. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.010
Huijbregts MA (1998) Application of uncertainty and variability in LCA. The Int J Life Cycle Assess 3(5):273–280. doi:10.1007/BF02979835
Kabir MR, Rooke B, Dassanayake GM, Fleck BA (2012) Comparative life cycle energy, emission, and economic analysis of 100 kW nameplate wind power generation. Renew Energy 37(1):133–141. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2011.06.003
Tan RR, Culaba AB, Purvis MR (2002) Application of possibility theory in the lifecycle inventory assessment of biofuels. Int J Energy Res 26(8):737–745. doi:10.1002/er.812
Fleck B, Huot M (2009) Comparative life-cycle assessment of a small wind turbine for residential off-grid use. Renew Energy 34(12):2688–2696. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2009.06.016
Khan FI, Hawboldt K, Iqbal MT (2005) Life cycle analysis of wind–fuel cell integrated system. Renew Energy 30(2):157–177. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2004.05.009
Ortiz O, Castells F, Sonnemann G (2009) Sustainability in the construction industry: a review of recent developments based on LCA. Constr Build Mater 23(1):28–39. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.11.012
Wang Y, Sun T (2012) Life cycle assessment of CO2 emissions from wind power plants: methodology and case studies. Renew Energy 43:30–36. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2011.12.017
Weidema BP, Wesnaes MS (1996) Data quality management for life cycle inventories—an example of using data quality indicators. J Clean Prod 4(3):167–174. doi:10.1016/S0959-6526(96)00043-1
NETL (2010) Life cycle inventory data—unit process: horizontal turbine main frame, 1.5–6 MW capacity, manufacturing. U.S. Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, 2010. Last Updated: November 2010 (version 01), www.netl.doe.gov/energy-analyses, http://www.netl.doe.gov/energy-analyses. (Accessed on 26-07-2016)
Canter KG, Kennedy DJ, Montgomery DC, Keats JB, Carlyle WM (2002) Screening stochastic life cycle assessment inventory models. The Int J Life Cycle Assess 7(1):18–26. doi:10.1007/BF02978906
NETL (2010) Life cycle inventory data—unit process: horizontal turbine main frame, 1.5–6 MW capacity, manufacturing. U.S. Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory. Last Updated: November 2010 (version 01). www.netl.doe.gov/energy-analyses. (accessed on 26-07-2016)
Cohen J, Schweizer T, Laxson A, Butterfield S, Schreck S, Fingersh L, Veers P, Ashwill T (2008) Technology improvement opportunities for low wind speed turbines and implications for cost of energy reduction. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado (US), Technical Report NREL/TP-500-41036
Lantz E, Wiser R, Hand M (2012) IEA Wind Task 26: the past and future cost of wind energy, work package 2. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO
Papadopoulos I (2010) Comparative analysis of electricity generating technologies with regards to environmental burdens. PhD Dissertation, University of Bath, UK
Fingersh LJ, Hand MM, Laxson AS (2006) Wind turbine design cost and scaling model. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Golden, CO.
Venkatesh A, Jaramillo P, Griffin WM, Matthews HS (2010) Uncertainty analysis of life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from petroleum-based fuels and impacts on low carbon fuel policies. Environ Sci Technol 45(1):125–131. doi:10.1021/es102498a
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(PDF 269 kb)
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Ozoemena, M., Cheung, W.M. & Hasan, R. Improving uncertainty analysis of embodied energy and embodied carbon in wind turbine design. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94, 1565–1577 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9972-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9972-7