Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of reinforcement type on the microstructure, mechanical properties, and wear resistance of A356 matrix composites produced by FSP

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fabrication of particle-reinforced aluminum matrix composites has been pursued with a keen interest recently. However, a comparison of the effect of different reinforcements on the mechanical properties and wear resistance of A356 matrix composites fabricated by FSP is of great interest to be considered. In the present work, the microstructural, mechanical, and wear properties of A356 matrix composites reinforced by SiC, TiC, ZrO2, and B4C particles are investigated. Moreover, the effect of pin profile on distribution of reinforcing particles in the stir zone of the FSPed specimens is investigated. Hardness and wear tests are performed in order to investigate mechanical and wear properties of the composites. The composite reinforced by TiC particles exhibits higher hardness value compared with other reinforcements due to the excellent bonding between TiC and metal matrix as well as higher hardness value of reinforcement itself than other reinforcements. Moreover, wear test results show that the wear resistance of the composite is significantly improved compared with that of the base metal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tutunchilar S et al (2012) Simulation of material flow in friction stir processing of a cast Al–Si alloy. Mater Des 40:415–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Srivastava VC, Mandal RK, Ojha SN (2001) Microstructure and mechanical properties of Al–Si alloys produced by spray forming process. Mater Sci Eng A 304–306:555–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alidokht SA et al (2012) Evaluation of microstructure and wear behavior of friction stir processed cast aluminum alloy. Mater Charact 63:90–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tutunchilar S et al (2012) Eutectic Al–Si piston alloy surface transformed to modified hypereutectic alloy via FSP. Mater Sci Eng A 534:557–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Akbari, M., et al., Investigation of the effect of friction stir processing parameters on temperature and forces of Al–Si aluminum alloys. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials Design and Applications, 2015.

  6. Akbari, M., et al., The effect of in-process cooling conditions on temperature, force, wear resistance, microstructural, and mechanical properties of friction stir processed A356. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials Design and Applications, 2016.

  7. Asadi P et al (2012) Predicting the grain size and hardness of AZ91/SiC nanocomposite by artificial neural networks. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 63(9–12):1095–1107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Behnagh RA, Besharati Givi MK, Akbari M (2011) Mechanical properties, corrosion resistance, and microstructural changes during friction stir processing of 5083 aluminum rolled plates. Mater Manuf Process 27(6):636–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pantelis D et al (1995) Formation of wear resistant Al–SiC surface composite by laser melt–particle injection process. Mater Sci Technol 11(3):299–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Meng C et al (2013) Evolution behavior of TiB2 particles during laser welding on aluminum metal matrix composites reinforced with particles. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 23(6):1543–1548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sharma V, Prakash U, Kumar BVM (2015) Surface composites by friction stir processing: a review. J Mater Process Technol 224:117–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhao Y et al (2015) Effect of friction stir processing with B4C particles on the microstructure and mechanical properties of 6061 aluminum alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 78(9):1437–1443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Akbari M, Abdi Behnagh R (2012) Dissimilar friction-stir lap joining of 5083 aluminum alloy to CuZn34 brass. Metall Mater Trans B 43(5):1177–1186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shojaeefard MH et al (2013) Modelling and Pareto optimization of mechanical properties of friction stir welded AA7075/AA5083 butt joints using neural network and particle swarm algorithm. Mater Des 44:190–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Akbari M et al (2013) Enhancing metallurgical and mechanical properties of friction stir lap welding of Al–Cu using intermediate layer. Sci Technol Weld Join 18(6):518–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shojaeefard MH et al (2014) Optimization of microstructural and mechanical properties of friction stir welding using the cellular automaton and Taguchi method. Mater Des 64:660–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Asadi, P., et al., Optimization of AZ91 friction stir welding parameters using Taguchi method. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials Design and Applications, 2015.

  18. Mostafa A et al (2016) A cellular automaton model for microstructural simulation of friction stir welded AZ91 magnesium alloy. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 24(3):035012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Akbari M, Abdi Behnagh R, Dadvand A (2012) Effect of materials position on friction stir lap welding of Al to Cu. Sci Technol Weld Joining 17(7):581–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dolatkhah A et al (2012) Investigating effects of process parameters on microstructural and mechanical properties of Al5052/SiC metal matrix composite fabricated via friction stir processing. Mater Des 37:458–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bauri R, Yadav D, Suhas G (2011) Effect of friction stir processing (FSP) on microstructure and properties of Al–TiC in situ composite. Mater Sci Eng A 528(13–14):4732–4739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Shafiei-Zarghani A, Kashani-Bozorg SF, Zarei-Hanzaki A (2009) Microstructures and mechanical properties of Al/Al2O3 surface nano-composite layer produced by friction stir processing. Mater Sci Eng A 500(1–2):84–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu Q et al (2013) Microstructure and mechanical property of multi-walled carbon nanotubes reinforced aluminum matrix composites fabricated by friction stir processing. Mater Des 45:343–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ci L et al (2006) Investigation of the interfacial reaction between multi-walled carbon nanotubes and aluminum. Acta Mater 54(20):5367–5375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jafari J, Givi M, Barmouz M (2015) Mechanical and microstructural characterization of Cu/CNT nanocomposite layers fabricated via friction stir processing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 78(1–4):199–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Khodabakhshi F et al (2014) Strain rate sensitivity, work hardening, and fracture behavior of an Al-Mg TiO2 nanocomposite prepared by friction stir processing. Metall Mater Trans A 45(9):4073–4088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Puviyarasan M, Senthil Kumar VS (2015) An experimental investigation for multi-response optimization of friction stir process parameters during fabrication of AA6061/B4Cp composites. Arab J Sci Eng 40(6):1733–1741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Asadi P, Mahdavinejad RA, Tutunchilar S (2011) Simulation and experimental investigation of FSP of AZ91 magnesium alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 528(21):6469–6477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Assidi M et al (2010) Friction model for friction stir welding process simulation: calibrations from welding experiments. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 50(2):143–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Asadi, P., M. Akbari, and H. Karimi-Nemch, 12 - Simulation of friction stir welding and processing, in Advances in Friction-Stir Welding and Processing, M.K.B. Givi and P. Asadi, Editors. 2014, Woodhead Publishing. p. 499–542.

  31. Marzbanrad, J., et al. (2014) Characterization of the influence of tool pin profile on microstructural and mechanical properties of friction stir welding METALLURGICAL AND MATERIALS TRANSACTIONS B. In press.

  32. Shojaeefard, M.H., et al., Investigation of friction stir welding tool parameters using FEM and neural network. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials Design and Applications, 2013.

  33. Asadi P, Besharati Givi M, Akbari M (2015) Microstructural simulation of friction stir welding using a cellular automaton method: a microstructure prediction of AZ91 magnesium alloy. Int J Mech Mater Eng 10(1):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Shojaeefard M, Akbari M, Asadi P (2014) Multi objective optimization of friction stir welding parameters using FEM and neural network. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 15(11):2351–2356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Asadi, P., M. Besharati Givi, and M. Akbari, Simulation of dynamic recrystallization process during friction stir welding of AZ91 magnesium alloy. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2015: p. 1–11.

  36. Mahmoud ERI et al (2010) Wear characteristics of surface-hybrid-MMCs layer fabricated on aluminum plate by friction stir processing. Wear 268(9–10):1111–1121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Shojaeefard MH, et al. (2016) Effect of tool pin profile on distribution of reinforcement particles during friction stir processing of B 4 C/aluminum composites. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials Design and Applications.

  38. Sahraeinejad S et al (2015) Fabrication of metal matrix composites by friction stir processing with different particles and processing parameters. Mater Sci Eng A 626:505–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Izadi H, Gerlich AP (2012) Distribution and stability of carbon nanotubes during multi-pass friction stir processing of carbon nanotube/aluminum composites. Carbon 50(12):4744–4749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Shinoda T, Kawai M (2003) Surface modification by novel friction thermomechanical process of aluminum alloy castings. Surf Coat Technol 169–170:456–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Mahmoud TS (2013) Surface modification of A390 hypereutectic Al–Si cast alloys using friction stir processing. Surf Coat Technol 228:209–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Abdizadeh H, Baghchesara MA (2013) Investigation on mechanical properties and fracture behavior of A356 aluminum alloy based ZrO2 particle reinforced metal-matrix composites. Ceram Int 39(2):2045–2050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Liu Y et al (2004) The effect of rare earth CeO2 on microstructure and properties of in situ TiC/Al–Si composite. Mater Lett 58(3–4):432–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Lashgari HR et al (2010) Heat treatment effect on the microstructure, tensile properties and dry sliding wear behavior of A356–10% B4C cast composites. Mater Des 31(9):4414–4422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Anandkumar R et al (2007) Microstructure and wear studies of laser clad Al-Si/SiC(p) composite coatings. Surf Coat Technol 201(24):9497–9505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Anandkumar R, Almeida A, Vilar R (2012) Microstructure and sliding wear resistance of an Al–12 wt.% Si/TiC laser clad coating. Wear 282–283:31–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Mazahery A, Ostad Shabani M. (2012) Mechanical Properties of Squeeze-Cast A356 Composites Reinforced With B4C Particulates. J of Materi Eng and Perform. 21:247–52

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mostafa Akbari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shojaeefard, M.H., Akbari, M., Asadi, P. et al. The effect of reinforcement type on the microstructure, mechanical properties, and wear resistance of A356 matrix composites produced by FSP. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91, 1391–1407 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9853-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9853-0

Keywords

Navigation