Skip to main content
Log in

Finite element modeling of microstructural changes in Waspaloy dry machining

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It has been well documented in the literature the importance of strict surface integrity checks upon performance and quality of machined components, especially for the safety critical components (e.g., aerospace) that work at cyclic high mechanical loads and elevated temperatures. In this field, Waspaloy, within the commercially available nickel-based superalloys, is extensively applied in different industries such as aircraft, chemical plant equipment, and petrochemical equipment. The main objective of this paper is to implement a reliable FE model, for dry orthogonal machining of Waspaloy, capable to predict microstructural changes and dynamic recrystallization during the cutting process. A user subroutine was implemented in FE code to simulate the dynamic recrystallization and consequently grain refinement and hardness variation on the machined surface and below it. Zener–Hollomon (Z-H) and Hall–Petch (H-P) equations were employed to, respectively, predict grain size and microhardness. In addition, depth of the affected layer was controlled using the critical strain equation. FE numerical model was properly calibrated using an iterative procedure based on the comparison between simulated and experimental results. Finally, very good agreement was found between experimental and simulated results of grain size, microhardness, depth of the affected layer, and other fundamental variables such as cutting forces, temperature, and chip morphology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Miller S (1996) Advanced materials means advanced engines. Interdscip Sci Rev 21(2):117–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Choudhury IA, El-Baradie MA (1998) Machinability of nickel-base super alloys: a general review. J Mater Proc Technol 74:278–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ezugwu EO (2005) Key improvements in the machining of difficult-to-cut aerospace superalloys. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45(12–13):1353–1367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ezugwu EO, Bonney J, Yamane Y (2003) An overview of the machinability of aeroengine alloys. J Mater Proc Technol 134(2):233–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Agrawal A, Goel S, Rashid WB, Price M (2015) Prediction of surface roughness during hard turning of AISI 4340 steel (69 HRC). Appl Soft Comput 30:279–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jafarian F, Imaz Ciaran M, Umbrello D, Arrazola PJ, Filice L, Amirabadi H (2014) Finite element simulation of machining Inconel 718 alloy including microstructure changes. Int J Mech Sci 88:110–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rotella G, Dillon OW Jr, Umbrello D, Settineri L, Jawahir IS (2013) Finite element modeling of microstructural changes in turning of AA7075-T651. J Manuf Proc 15:87–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jawahir IS, Brinksmeier E, M’Saoubi R, Aspinwall DK, Outeiro JC, Meyer D (2011) Surface integrity in material removal processes: recent advances. Ann CIRP Manuf Technol 60(2):603–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Axinte DA, Dewes RC (2002) Surface integrity of hot work tool steel after high speed milling: experimental data and empirical models. J Mater Proc Technol 127(3):325–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Thomas JP, Montheillet F, Semiatin SL (2007) A geometric framework for mesoscale models of recrystallization. Metall Mater Trans A 38:2095–2109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sommitsch C, Mitter W (2006) Acta Mater 54:357–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Calamaz M, Coupard D, Girot F (2008) A new material model for 2D numerical simulation of serrated chip formation when machining titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V. Int J Mach Tools & Manuf 48:275–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sima M, Ozel T (2010) Modified material constitutive models for serrated chip formation simulations and experimental validation in machining of titanium. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 50(11):943–960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang B, Liu Z (2015) Shear localization sensitivity analysis for Johnson–Cook constitutive parameters on serrated chips in high speed machining of Ti6Al4V. Simul Model Pract Theory 55:63–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shrot A, Baker M (2015) Determination of Johnson–Cook parameters from machining simulations. Comput Mater Sci 52(1):298–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ljustina G, Larsson R, Fagerstrom M (2014) A FE based machining simulation methodology accounting for cast iron microstructure. Finite Elem Anal Des 80:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Umbrello D, M’Saoubi R, Outeiro JC (2007) The influence of Johnson-Cook material constants on finite element simulation of machining of AISI 316L steel. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47(3–4):462–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Arrazola PJ, Özel T, Umbrello D, Davies M, Jawahir IS (2013) Recent advances in modelling of metal machining processes. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 62(2):695–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. ASTM E112—12 standard test methods for determining average grain size.

  20. Deform® user manual. Columbus, OH, USA: SFTC-Deform; 2010.

  21. Rotella G, Umbrello D (2014) Numerical simulation of surface modification in dry and cryogenic machining of AA7075 alloy. Procedia CIRP 13:327–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhou L, Liu G, Han Z, Lu K (2008) Grain size effect on wear resistance of a nanostructured AISI 52100 steel. Scripta Mater 58:445–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ho HS, Risbet M, Feaugas X, Moulin G (2011) Damage mechanism related to localization of plastic deformation of WaspaloyTM: effect of grain size. Proc Eng 10:863–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Del Prete A, Filice L, Umbrello D (2013) Numerical simulation of machining nickel-based alloys. Procedia CIRP 8:539–544

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rotella G, Umbrello D (2014) Finite element modeling of microstructural changes in dry and cryogenic cutting of Ti6Al4V alloy. Ann CIRP Manuf Technol 63:69–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Thomas JP, Montheillet F, Semiatin SL ‘Modeling of microstructure evolution during the thermomechanical processing of nickel-base superalloys’, ASM Handbook: Fundamentals of Modeling for Metals Processing, 22, 566–582

  27. Tsuji N, Maki T (2009) Enhanced structural refinement by combining phase transformation and plastic deformation in steels. Scripta Mater 60/12:1044–1049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shen G, Semiatin SL, Shivpuri R (1995) Modeling microstructural development during the forging of Waspaloy. Metal Mater Trans A 26:1795–1803

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Umbrello.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Caruso, S., Imbrogno, S., Rinaldi, S. et al. Finite element modeling of microstructural changes in Waspaloy dry machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89, 227–240 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9037-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9037-y

Keywords

Navigation