Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Surface roughness prediction in end milling by using predicted point oriented local linear estimation method

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Surface roughness is one of the most important indexes of the product quality, and the accurate prediction on surface roughness can provide a more economical way to determine the machining process using computer numerical control machines. In this paper, the effects between the machining parameters and the surface roughness are investigated, and one method named predicted point oriented local linear estimator (PPOLLE) is proposed for the surface roughness prediction. The PPOLLE contains two prediction stages: the first one is to generate effective pseudo data and the other one focuses on the final prediction based on the large amount of pseudo samples. The performance of PPOLLE is evaluated by using a set of benchmark functions. The results show that PPOLLE is an effective modeling approach within limited time consumption. Furthermore, two sets of experimental data are obtained to validate the PPOLLE on the surface roughness prediction in end milling. Three machining parameters, the spindle speed, the feed rate, and the depth of cut, are selected as the input. Several comparisons among proposed PPOLLE and several traditional methods, adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system, artificial neural network, and gene expression programming, are also conducted. The results indicate that PPOLLE outperforms those methods and is very effective for the surface roughness prediction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Erzurumlu T, Oktem H (2007) Comparison of response surface model with neural network in determining the surface quality of moulded parts. Mater Design 28(2):459–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bhardwaj B, Kumar R, Singh PK (2014) An improved surface roughness prediction model using Box-Cox transformation with RSM in end milling of EN 353. J Mech Sci Technol 28(12):5149–5157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barzani MM, Zalnezhad E, Sarhan AAD, Farahany S, Ramesha S (2015) Fuzzy logic based model for predicting surface roughness of machined Al–Si–Cu–Fe die casting alloy using different additives-turning. Measurement 61:150–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mahesh G, Muthu S, Devadasan SR (2015) Prediction of surface roughness of end milling operation using genetic algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 77(1-4):369–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Upadhyay V, Jain PK, Mehta NK (2013) In-process prediction of surface roughness in turning of Ti–6Al–4V alloy using cutting parameters and vibration signals. Measurement 46:154–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bustillo A, Correa M (2012) Using artificial intelligence to predict surface roughness in deep drilling of steel components. J Intell Manuf 23:1893–1902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Senthilkumar C, Ganesan G, Karthikeyan R (2009) Study of electrochemical machining characteristics of Al/SiCp composites. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 43:256–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lou SJ, Chen JC (1999) In-process surface roughness recognition (ISRR) system in end milling operation. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 15:200–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Benardos PG, Vosniakos GC (2003) Predicting surface roughness in machining: a review. Int J Mach Tool Manu 43(8):833–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Asiltürk I, ÇUnkaş M (2011) Modeling and prediction of surface roughness in turning operations using artificial neural network and multiple regression method. Expert Syst Appl 38:5826–5832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Asiltürk I (2012) Predicting surface roughness of hardened AISI 1040 based on cutting parameters using neural networks and multiple regression. Int J Mach Tool Manu 63(1-4):249–257

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ozel T, Karpat Y (2005) Predictive modeling of surface roughness and tool wear in hard turning using regression and neural networks. Int J Mach Tool Manu 45:467–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ozcelik B, Bayramoglu M (2006) The statistical modeling of surface roughness in high-speed flat end milling. Int J Mach Tool Manu 46:1395–1402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Durmus K (2009) Prediction and control of surface roughness in CNC lathe using artificial neural network. J Mater Process Tech 209:3125–3137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jesuthanam CP, Kumanan S, Asokan P (2007) Surface roughness prediction using hybrid neural networks. Mach Sci Technol 11:271–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ali YM, Zhang LC (1999) Surface roughness prediction of ground components using a fuzzy logic approach. J Mater Process Tech 88–89:561–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dong M, Wang N (2011) Adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system with leave-one-out cross-validation approach for prediction of surface roughness. Appl Math Model 35:1024–1035

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Brezocnik M, Kovacic M (2003) Integrated genetic programming and genetic algorithm approach to predict surface roughness. Mater Manuf Process 18(3):475–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gandomi AH, Alavi AH (2011) Multi-stage genetic programming: a new strategy to nonlinear system modeling. Inform Sci 181:5227–5239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yang Y, Li XY, Jiang P, Zhang LP (2011) Prediction of surface roughness in end milling with gene expression programming. Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Computers & Industrial Engineering 441–446

  21. Hall P, Turlach BA (1997) Interpolation methods for adapting to sparse design in nonparametric regression. J Am Stat Assoc 92(438):466–476

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Chu CK, Deng WS (2003) An interpolation method for adapting to sparse design in multivariate nonparametric regression. J Stat Plan Infer 116:91–111

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Luo Y (2010) A local multivariate Lagrange interpolation method for constructing shape functions. Int J Numer Meth Biomed Eng 26(2):252–261

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Kumanan S, Jesuthanam CP, Kumar RA (2008) Application of multiple regression and adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system for the prediction of surface roughness. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 35:778–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Avery M (2013) Literature review for local polynomial regression. http://www4.ncsu.edu/∼Emravery/AveryReview2.pd

  26. Valentincic J, Junkar M (2006) Detection of the eroding surface in the EDM process based on the current signal in the gap. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 28:294–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Munoz-Sanchez A, Gozalez-Farias IM, Soldani X, Miguelez MH (2011) Hybrid FE/ANN and LPR approach for the inverse identification of material parameters from cutting tests. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 54:s21–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Xiao M, Wen L, Li X, Gao L (2015) Modeling of the feed-motor transient current in end milling by using varying-coefficient model. Math Probl Eng Article ID 103507, 9 pages

  29. Donnelly A, Misstear B, Broderick B (2011) Application of nonparametric regression methods to study the relationship between NO2 concentrations and local wind direction and speed at background sites. Sci Total Environ 409(6):1134–1144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Roca-Pardiñas J, Cadarso-Suárez C, Tahoces PG, Lado MJ (2008) Assessing continuous bivariate effects among different groups through nonparametric regression models: an application to breast cancer detection. Comput Stat Data Ann 52(4):1958–1970

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Arlot S, Celisse A (2010) A survey of cross-validation procedures for model selection. Stat Surv 4:40–79

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Hardle W, Mammen E (1993) Comparing nonparametric versus parametric regression fits. Ann Stat 21:1926–1947

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Lo SP (2003) An adaptive-network based fuzzy inference system for prediction of workpiece surface roughness in end milling. J Mater Process Tech 142:665–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ho WH, Tsai JT, Lin BT, Chou JH (2009) Adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system for prediction of surface roughness in end milling process using hybrid Taguchi-genetic learning algorithm. Expert Syst Appl 36:3216–3222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lou MS, Chen JC, Li CM (1998) Surface roughness prediction technique for CNC end-milling. J Ind Technol 15:1–6

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Digital Manufacturing Equipment and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430074, China

    Long Wen, Xinyu Li, Liang Gao & Wenchao Yi

  2. Yangzhou Marine Electronic Instruments Institute, P.O. Box 204, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, 225001, China

    Long Wen

Authors
  1. Long Wen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xinyu Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Liang Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Wenchao Yi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xinyu Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wen, L., Li, X., Gao, L. et al. Surface roughness prediction in end milling by using predicted point oriented local linear estimation method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 84, 2523–2535 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7884-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7884-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation