Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Enhancing fidelity of virtual assembly by considering human factors

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Virtual assembly (VA) provides a crucial opportunity to enhance product design and manufacturing efficiencies, but it still has no generic method to enable realistic behaviors during the assembly process. The real assembly process is strongly affected by the human factors and leaving the human aspect out of the assembly planning could result in incorrect or inefficient operations; however, this point is seriously neglected in the existing VA systems. This article simulates the human factors involved in the assembly process and analyzes the influence of the human factors on assembly performance on the basis of our previously presented physics-based assembly method, in which the assembling part is guided by the assembly force and the physics of the interaction is simulated. Assembly operations are simulated in a virtual environment, and the human factors including the visibility of an assembling part, posture, reachability, and fatigue of an operator are quantified. The new calculation methods of the estimated final position and the assembly force are presented to perform a more realistic assembly operation. This algorithm has been applied to a self-developed desktop virtual assembly prototype system. An example is illustrated, and the results show that this assembly method taking the human factors into account provides a realistic simulation of the assembly operations in virtual space and realizes a high consistence between virtual and real assembly process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. George C, Dimitris M, Dimitris F (2000) A virtual reality-based experimentation environment for the verification of human-related factors in assembly processes. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 16(4):267–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Judy MV, Georges D (2011) A conceptual framework to support natural interaction for virtual assembly tasks. Proceedings of the ASME World Conference on Innovative Virtual Reality (WINVR2011), Milan, Italy, pp 27-29

  3. Loic T, Georges D, Jerome P (2010) Interactive simulation of CAD models assemblies using virtual constraint guidance. Int J Interact Des Manuf 4(2):95–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Christian D, Jungwon Y (2011) Assembly simulations in virtual environments with optimized haptic path and sequence. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 27(2):306–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Loic T, Georges D, Jerome P (2010) Haptic assembly of CAD models using virtual constraint guidance. Proceedings of the ASME 2010 World Conference on Innovative Virtual Reality, Ames, Iowa, USA

  6. Liu ZY, Tan JR (2007) Constrained behavior manipulation for interactive assembly in a virtual environment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 32(7):797–810

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Yang RD, Fan XM, Wu DL, Yan JQ (2007) Virtual assembly technologies based on constraint and DOF analysis. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 23(4):447–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Frohlich B, Tramberend H, Beers A, Agarawala M, Baraff D (2000) Physically-based manipulation on the responsive workbench. Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual Reality Conference, New Brunswick, NJ, USA, pp 5-11

  9. Germanico GB, Hugo M, Theodore L, James R, Samir G (2014) The development of a physics and constraint based haptic virtual assembly system. Assem Autom 34(1):41–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Loock A, Schomer E (2001) Physically based cables for assembly simulation in virtual reality. 13th European Simulation Symposium, Ghent, Belgium, pp 294-297

  11. Abhishek S, Judy MV, James HO (2007) Combining geometric constraints with physics modeling for virtual assembly using SHARP. In: ASME design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, Las Vegas, NV, USA

  12. Abhishek S, Judy MV, James HO (2010) Combining dynamic modeling with geometric constraint management to support low clearance virtual manual assembly. J Mech Des 132(8):1002–1008

    Google Scholar 

  13. Holt POB, Ritchie JM, Day PN, Simmons JEL, Robinson G, Russell GT, Ng FM (2004) Immersive virtual reality in cable and pipe routing: design metaphors and cognitive ergonomics. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 4(3):161–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gao W, Shao XD, Liu HL (2014) Virtual assembly planning and assembly-oriented quantitative evaluation of product assemblability. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 71(1):486–496

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jayaram S, Wang Y, Tirumali H, Lyons K, Hart P, Jayaram U (1999) VADE: a virtual assembly design environment. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 19(6):44–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sankar J, Hugh IC, Kevin WL (1997) Virtual assembly using virtual reality techniques. Comput Aided Des 29(8):575–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wan HG, Gao SM, Peng QS, Dai GZ, Zhang FJ (2004) MIVAS: A multi-modal immersive virtual assembly system. ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences (DETC 2004) and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, pp 113-122

  18. Luis M, Norman M, Terrence F (2003) A constraint manager to support virtual maintainability. Comput Graph 27(1):19–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang QH, Li JR, Gong HQ (2006) A CAD-linked virtual assembly environment. Int J Prod Res 44(3):467–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhong YM, Wolfgang MW, Ma WY (2002) Incorporating constraints into a virtual reality environment for intuitive and precise solid modeling. Proceedings of the sixth international conference on information visualization, London, England

  21. Zhang SY, Gao Z, Tan JR (2002) Research of movement navigation based on assembly constraint recognition. Chin J Mech Eng 15(1):6–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang Y, Jayaram U, Jayaram S, Imtiyaz S (2003) Methods and algorithms for constraint-based virtual assembly. Virtual Reality 6(4):229–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gupta R, Whitney D, Zeltzer D (1997) Prototyping and design for assembly analysis using multimodal virtual environments. Comput Aided Des 29(8):585–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Adam SC, Scott DM, Bert B (2001) A haptic assembly and disassembly simulation environment and associated computational load optimization techniques. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 1(2):113–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Adam SC, Bert B (2002) Collision detection for virtual objects in a haptic assembly and disassembly simulation environment. ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Montreal, Canada

  26. Samir G, Ulises ZC (2007) The effect of contact force sensations on user performance in virtual assembly tasks. Virtual Reality 11(4):287–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Samir G, Ulises ZC (2009) Modeling dynamic behavior of parts in virtual assembly environment. Proceedings of the World Conference on Innovative Virtual Reality, Chalon sur Saone, France

  28. Chang EK, Judy MV (2004) Collision detection and part interaction modeling to facilitate immersive virtual assembly methods. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 4(2):83–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang Y, Jayaram U, Jayaram S, Lyons K (2001) Physically based modeling in virtual assembly. ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Pittsburgh, pp 295–305

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lim T, Ritchie JM, Corney JR, Dewar RG, Schmidt K, Bergsteiner K (2007) Assessment of a haptic virtual assembly system that uses physics-based interactions. IEEE International Symposium on Assembly and Manufacturing, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, pp 147-153

  31. Brad MH, Judy MV (2007) Desktop haptic virtual assembly using physically based modeling. Virtual Reality 11(4):207–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Abhishek S, Su HJ, Judy MV (2006) SHARP: a system for haptic assembly & realistic prototyping. In: ASME design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, Philadelphia, PA, USA

  33. William AM, Kevin DP, James JT (1999) Six degree-of-freedom haptic rendering using voxel sampling. Proceedings of the SIGGRAPH 99 Conference, Annual Conference Series, Los Angeles, CA, USA

  34. Just C, Bierbaum A, Baker A, Cruz-Neira C (1998) VR juggler: a framework for virtual reality development. In: 2nd Immersive projection technology workshop(IPT98), CD-ROM. Ames, IA

  35. Lin MC (2008) Haptic rendering: foundations, algorithms and applications. A.K. Peters publishers

  36. Atsuko E, Noriaki Y, Tatsuya S (2013) Automatic estimation of the ergonomics parameters of assembly operations. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 62(1):13–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Yang RD, Fan XM, Wu DL, Yan JQ (2007) A virtual reality-based experiment environment for engine assembly line workplace planning and ergonomics evaluation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4563:594–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Electronic Equipment Structure Design, Ministry of Education, Xidian University, Xian, 710071, China

    Wei Gao, Xiao-Dong Shao & Huan-Ling Liu

Authors
  1. Wei Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiao-Dong Shao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Huan-Ling Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiao-Dong Shao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gao, W., Shao, XD. & Liu, HL. Enhancing fidelity of virtual assembly by considering human factors. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83, 873–886 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7628-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7628-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation