Skip to main content
Log in

Automatic identification of feed marks in machined surface roughness profiles by correlating random variations

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new method is detailed to identify the positions of the ends of the tool marks in linear surface roughness profiles. No feed mark shape must be assumed and the process is entirely automated. The approach may find applications in automated quality control, surface texture classification, and modeling of metal cutting processes. Validation was done with 40 finish hard turning specimens. The method relies on the justified hypotheses that a feed mark profile is a superposition of a fixed and a random component, and that the random component has a spatial period equal to one feed mark length. A brief typology of tool mark particularities revealed by the method is presented as well as observations on the correlation of the random events within marks and between marks, both at short and at long range. Feed marks difficult to identify by visual inspection were easily identified with the method and evidence of overlapping tool marks and unstable regions was discovered. The limits of the method are also explored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brown CA (2012) Roughness. In: Bruce RW (ed) Handbook of lubrication and tribology. doi:10.1201/b12265-5. CRC Press, II

  2. Carroll CW, Sufi NW, Chang RC (1989) Suppression of tool marks to enhance detection of surface defects, vol 1164, pp 212–221

  3. Grzesik W, Brol S (2011) Identification of surface generation mechanisms based on process feed-back and decomposition of feed marks. Adv Mater Res 223:505–513. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.223.505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. ISO 12085:1996 (1996) Geometrical product specifications (GPS)—surface texture: Profile method—motif parameters. Standard, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, CH

    Google Scholar 

  5. ISO 25178-2:2012 (2012) Geometrical product specifications (GPS)—surface texture: Areal—part 2: Terms, definitions and surface texture parameters. Standard, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, CH

    Google Scholar 

  6. ISO 4287:1997 (1997) Geometrical product specifications (GPS)—surface texture: Profile method—terms, definitions, and surface texture parameters. Standard, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, CH

    Google Scholar 

  7. ISO/TS 16610-29:2006 (2006) Geometrical product specifications (GPS)—filtration—part 29: Linear profile filters: Spline wavelets. Standard, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, CH

    Google Scholar 

  8. Petropoulos GP, Pandazaras CN, Davim JP (2010) Surface texture characterization and evaluation related to machining. In: Davim JP (ed) Surface Integrity in Machining. Springer, London, pp 37–66

  9. Zahavi E, Torbilo V, Press S (1996) Fatigue design: Life expectancy of machine parts. A Solomon Press Book, Taylor & Francis

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul R. Provencher.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Provencher, P.R., Balaziski, M. Automatic identification of feed marks in machined surface roughness profiles by correlating random variations. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 82, 1305–1315 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7461-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7461-z

Keywords

Navigation