Skip to main content
Log in

Integration strategy of on-machine measurement (OMM) and numerical control (NC) machining for the large thin-walled parts with surface correlative constraint

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is a kind of large thin-walled parts in aerospace industry, the machining target surface of which is tightly associated with another specific surface (named correlative surface). And it is always the primary machining objective. However, the preformed correlative surface is significantly different from its original design model due to large profile and thickness errors. Thus, part-referenced machining is necessary to ensure the correlative constraint accuracy. In this article, an integration strategy of OMM and NC machining for the large thin-walled parts with surface correlative constraint is systematically developed. Generally, the integration process consists of correlative constraint analysis, on-machine measurement, machining target surface redesign, and NC machining. Firstly, an isoplanar-based on-machine scanning method is presented for large surface profile information extraction. Then, a unified target surface redesign model is established according to surfaces accompanying relation analysis. Further, to compensate stress-induced monotonic structural deformation, a partitioned measuring and machining approach has been employed. Finally, the liquid rocket engine nozzle as a typical part was employed to verify the validation of the proposed strategy. Coolant channel machining experiments were conducted on a special dual-spindle machine tools. For a nozzle with machining area about 8 m2, the correlative accuracy could be controlled in the range of ±0.1 mm. It has been proved that incorporating dimensional metrology feedback to machining process could consistently improve machining quality and efficiency of large thin-walled parts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arnaud L, Gonzalo O, Seguy S, Jauregi H, Peigne G (2011) Simulation of low rigidity part machining applied to thin-walled structures. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 54:479–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. BudaK E, Altintas Y (1995) Modeling and avoidance of static form errors in peripheral milling of plates. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 35(3):459–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chantzis D, Van-der-Veen S, Zettler J, Sim WM (2013) An industrial workflow to minimise part distortion for machining of large monolithic components in aerospace industry. Procedia CIRP 54(1):483–486

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chen W, Xue J, Tang D, Chen H, Qu S (2009) Deformation prediction and error compensation in multilayer milling processes for thin-walled parts. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49:859–864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cho MW, Seo T (2002) Inspection planning strategy for the on-machine measurement process based on CAD/CAM/CAI integration. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 19:607–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cho MW, Seo T, Kwon HD (2003) Integrated error compensation method using OMM system for profile milling operation. J Mater Process Technol 136:88–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ding H, Zhu LM (2011) Geometric theories and methods for digital manufacturing of complex surfaces. Science Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  8. Guiassa R, Mayer JRR (2011) Predictive compliance based model for compensation in multi-pass milling by on-machine probing. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 60(1):391–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Guiassa R, Mayer JRR, Balazinski M, Engin S, Delorme FE (2014) Closed door machining error compensation of complex surfaces using the cutting compliance coefficient and on-machine measurement for a milling process. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 27(11):1022–1030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Guo D (2011) Function-geometry integrated precision machining methods and technologies for high performance workpieces. Chin Eng Sci 13(10):47–57

    Google Scholar 

  11. Huang N, Bi Q, Wang Y, Sun C (2014) 5-Axis adaptive flank milling of flexible thin-walled parts based on the on-machine measurement. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 8:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jia ZY, Ji T, Guo DM, Bian GH (2004) A precision grinding technique for radome inner surfaces. Key Eng Mater 257–258:177–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim SH, Ko TJ, Ahn JH (2002) Elimination of settling error due to clamping forces in on-machine measurement. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 19:573–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kondo K, Hasegawa K, Kawamata H, Morishita T, Naito F (2012) On-machine non-contact dimension-measurement system with laser displacement sensor for vane-tip machining of RFQs. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect A 667:5–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu HB, Wang YQ, Huang XP, Xue L (2013) Isoplanar-based adaptive sampling for model-unknown sculptured surface coordinate metrology using non-contact probe. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 64:1695–1707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Marusich TD, Usui S, Lankalapalli S, Saini N, Zamorano L, Grevstad A (2006) Residual stress prediction for part distortion modeling. SAE, 2006, 2006-01-3171

  17. Mears L, Roth JT, Djurdjanovic D, Yang XP, Kurfess T (2009) Quality and inspection of machining operations--CMM integration to the machine tool. J Manuf Sci Eng-Trans ASME 131: 051006(1-13)

  18. Rai JK, Xirouchakis P (2008) Finite element method based machining simulation environment for analyzing part errors induced during milling of thin-walled components. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48(6):629–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ratchev S, Liu S, Huang W, Becker AA (2006) An advanced FEA based force induced error compensation strategy in milling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46:542–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Smith KS, Woody BA (2005) Improving the accuracy of large scale monolithic parts using fiducials. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 54(1):483–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Smith S, Wilhelm R, Dutterer B, Cherukuri H, Goel G (2012) Sacrificial structure preforms for thin part machining. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 61(1):379–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Soroush M, Saeid A, Ehsan S, Hamdollah EC (2015) Effect of machining-induced residual stress on the distortionof thin-walled parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 76:597–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Uriarte L, Zatarain M, Axinte D, Yague-Fabra J, Ihlenfeldt S, Eguia J, Olarra A (2013) Machine tools for large parts. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 62(2):731–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wei Y, Wang XW (2007) Computer simulation and experimental study of machining deflection due to original residual stress of aerospace thin-walled parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 33:260–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Woody BA, Smith KS, Hocken RJ, Miller JA (2007) A technique for enhancing machine tool accuracy by transferring the metrology reference from the machine tool to the workpiece. J Manuf Sci Eng Trans ASME 129(3):636–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. B. Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, H.B., Wang, Y.Q., Jia, Z.Y. et al. Integration strategy of on-machine measurement (OMM) and numerical control (NC) machining for the large thin-walled parts with surface correlative constraint. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 80, 1721–1731 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7046-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7046-x

Keywords

Navigation