Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal tolerance design for products with non-normal distribution based on asymmetric quadratic quality loss

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Due to the effect of various factors, the product quality characteristics are sometimes non-normal distribution. In this paper, two most commonly used non-normal distributions, triangular distribution and trapezoidal distribution, are studied based on asymmetric quadratic quality loss. With asymmetric quality loss, it is necessary to optimize the process mean in order to reduce the expected quality losses. In order to optimize the process mean of the triangular distribution, the different distances between the target value and the process mean are considered, and two mathematical models are proposed to calculate the expected quality loss. Because the probability density function of the trapezoidal distribution is a three-segment function, in order to optimize the process mean of the trapezoidal distribution, three models are established. Solving the proposed models, analytical solutions for the optimal process mean are obtained, and equations for the minimum quality loss are established. Considering the sum of manufacturing cost and the minimum quality loss as the objective function, tolerance model is established to calculate the optimal tolerances. Therefore, the optimal process mean and optimal tolerances are obtained for triangular distribution and trapezoidal distribution. At last, an example is used to illustrate the validity of the established model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Taguchi G, Elsayed EA, Hsiang TC (1989) Quality engineering in production system. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cheng BW, Maghsoodloo S (1995) Optimization of mechanical assembly tolerances by incorporating Taguchi’s quality loss function. J Manuf Syst 14(4):264–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jeang A (1999) Robust tolerance design by response surface methodology. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 15(6):399–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Feng CX, Wang J, Wang JS (2001) An optimization model for concurrent selection of tolerances and suppliers. Comput Ind Eng 40(1–2):15–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chou CY, Chang CL (2001) Minimum-loss assembly tolerance allocation by considering product degradation and time value of money. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 17(2):139–146

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Ye B, Salustri FA (2003) Simultaneous tolerance synthesis for manufacturing and quality. Res Eng Des 14(2):98–106

    Google Scholar 

  7. Prabhaharan G, Ramesh R, Asokan P (2007) Concurrent optimization of assembly tolerances for quality with position control using scatter search approach. Int J Prod Res 45(21):4959–4988

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Huang MF, Zhong YR, Xu ZG (2005) Concurrent process tolerance design based on minimum product manufacturing cost and quality loss. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 25(7–8):714–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Naidu NVR (2008) Mathematical model for quality cost optimization. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 24(6):811–815

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Cao Y, Mao J, Ching H, Yang J (2009) A robust tolerance optimization method based on fuzzy quality loss. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanic Eng Sci 223(11):2647–2653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Piepel GF, Ozler C, Sehirlioglu AK (2013) Optimum tolerance design using component-amount and mixture-amount experiments. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 68(9–12):2359–2369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu SG, Jin Q, Wang P, Xie RJ (2014) Closed-form solutions for multi-objective tolerance optimization. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 70(9–12):1859–1866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shin S, Kongsuwon P, Cho BR (2010) Development of the parametric tolerance modeling and optimization schemes and cost-effective solutions. Eur J Oper Res 207(3):1728–1741

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Li MHC (2004) Optimal target selection for unbalanced tolerance design. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 23(9–10):743–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Maghsoodloo S, Li MHC (2000) Optimal asymmetric tolerance design. IIE Trans 32(12):1127–1137

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jeang A (2001) Combined parameter and tolerance design optimization with quality and cost. Int J Prod Res 39(5):923–952

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Jeang A, Chung CP, Hsieh CK (2007) Simultaneous process mean and process tolerance determination with asymmetrical loss function. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 31(7–8):694–704

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jeang A, Chung CP, Hsieh CK (2008) Process mean, process tolerance, and use time determination for product life application under deteriorating process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 36(1–2):97–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jeang A (2009) Optimal determination of the process means, process tolerances, and resetting cycle for process planning under process shifting. J Manuf Syst 28(4):98–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Seo HS, Kwak BM (2002) Efficient statistical tolerance analysis for general distributions using three-point information. Int J Prod Res 40(4):931–944

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Varghese P, Braswell RN, Wang B, Zhang C (1996) Statistical tolerance analysis using FRPDF and numerical convolution. Comput Aided Design 28(9):723–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tsai JC, Kuo CH (2012) A novel statistical tolerance analysis method for assembled parts. Int J Prod Res 50(12):3498–3513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jiang ZD (2000) Mechanical precision design. Xi’an Jiaotong University Press, Xi’an

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wu CC, Tang GR (1998) Tolerance design for products with asymmetric quality losses. Int J Prod Res 36(9):2529–2541

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Killmann F, Collani EV (2001) A note on the convolution of the uniform and related distributions and their use in quality control. Econ Qual Control 16(1):17–41

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen CH, Chou CY (2003) Determining the optimum manufacturing target based on an asymmetric quality loss function. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 21(3):193–195

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Goncalves L, Amaral-Turkman MA (2008) Triangular and trapezoidal distributions: applications in the genome analysis. J Stat Theor Pract 2(1):45–54

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. van Dorp JR, Kotz S (2003) Generalized trapezoidal distributions. Metrika 58(1):85–97

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Glickman TS, Xu F (2009) The distribution of the product of two triangular random variables. Stat Probabil Lett 78(16):2821–2826

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Kang JS, Kim SL, Kim YH, Jang YS (2010) Generalized convolution of uniform distributions. J Appl Math Inform 28(5–6):1573–1581

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Al-Ansary MD, Deiab IM (1997) Concurrent optimization of design and machining tolerances using the genetic algorithms method. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 37(12):1721–1731

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shaogang Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jin, Q., Liu, S. & Wang, P. Optimal tolerance design for products with non-normal distribution based on asymmetric quadratic quality loss. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 78, 667–675 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6681-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6681-y

Keywords

Navigation