Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Energy-based optimization of the material stock allowance for turning-grinding process sequence

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Intensive appeal for energy saving has driven the production industry towards more environmentally benign manufacturing. Diverse process settings in manufacturing can result in a high variance of energy consumption. Regarding process chains, the allocation of machining stock to each process is very crucial in terms of energy use. Optimization of material stock allowance and process parameters can effectively reduce the production energy. In this study, two cylindrical machining processes—turning and grinding—are compared at machine level with respect to energy intensity and surface roughness. A systematic energy-efficient approach, based on minimizing the production energy while complying with the required surface roughness, has been developed and validated to optimize the grinding stock for the turning-grinding process sequence. Compared to conventional stock allocation method, the developed approach results in more than 16 % of energy reduction for the turning-grinding process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Duflou JR, Sutherland JW, Dornfeld D, Herrmann C, Jeswiet J, Kara S, Hauschild M, Kellens K (2012) Towards energy and resource efficient manufacturing: a process and systems approach. CIRP Ann 61(2):587–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. European Commission (2010) Energy—yearly statistics 2008, Eurostat Statistical Books, ISSN 1830-7833

  3. Gutowski T, Murphy C, Allen D, Bauer D, Bras B, Piwonka T, Sheng P, Sutherland J, Thurston D, Wolff E (2005) Environmentally benign manufacturing: observations from Japan, Europe and the United States. J Clean Prod 13(1):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Diaz N, Helu M, Jarvis A, Tönissen S, Dornfeld D, Schlosser R (2009) Strategies for minimum energy operation for precision machining. Proceedings of MTTRF 2009 Annual Meeting

  5. Kara S, Li W (2011) Unit process energy consumption models for material removal processes. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 60(1):37–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mativenga PT, Rajemi MF (2011) Calculation of optimum cutting parameters based on minimum energy footprint. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 60(1):149–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sheng P, Srinivasan M, Kobayashi S (1995) Multi-objective process planning in environmentally conscious manufacturing: a feature-based approach. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 44(1):433–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Weinert N, Chiotellis S, Seliger G (2011) Methodology for planning and operating energy-efficient production systems. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 60(1):41–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Janakiraman V, Saravanan R (2010) Concurrent optimization of machining processes parameters and tolerance allocation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 51(1–4):357–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Halevi G, Weill RD (1995) Principals of process planning—a logical approach, 1st edn. Chapman & Hall, London, ISBN:0412543605

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Ren YH, Zhang B, Zhou ZX (2009) Specific energy in grinding of tungsten carbides of various grain sizes. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 58(1):299–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Guo Y, Loenders J, Duflou JR, Lauwers B (2012) Optimization of energy consumption and surface quality in finish turning. Procedia CIRP 1:512–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Klocke F, Brinksmeier E, Weinert K (2005) Capability profile of hard cutting and grinding processes. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 54(2):22–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Araujo JB, Oliveira JFG (2012) Evaluation of two competing machining processes based on sustainability indicators. Proceedings of the 19th CIRP Conference on Life Cycle Engineering, pp 317–322

  15. Dahmus JB, Gutowski TG (2004) An environmental analysis of machining. Proceedings of ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and R&D Exposition, pp 13–19

  16. Fang XD, Safi-Jahanshahi H (1997) A new algorithm for developing a reference-based model for predicting surface roughness in finish turning of steels. Int J Prod Res 35(1):179–199

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Tönshof HK, Peters J, Inasaki I, Paul T (1992) Modeling and simulation of grinding processes. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 41(2):677–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hecker RL, Liang SY (2003) Predictive modeling of surface roughness in grinding. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43(8):755–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. WNT Deutschland GmbH (2011) Cutting condition for fine machining, Turning Tool Catalogue, pp 210

  20. Duflou JR, Kellens K, Renaldi, Guo Y, Dewulf W (2012) Critical comparison of methods to determine the energy input for discrete manufacturing processes. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 61(1):63–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Li W, Winter M, Kara S, Herrmann C (2012) Eco-efficiency of manufacturing processes: a grinding case. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 61(1):59–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bert Lauwers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, Y., Duflou, J.R. & Lauwers, B. Energy-based optimization of the material stock allowance for turning-grinding process sequence. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 75, 503–513 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6139-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6139-2

Keywords

Navigation