Skip to main content
Log in

Techno-economic evaluation of reducing shielding gas consumption in GMAW whilst maintaining weld quality

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A series of experimental trials have been conducted to investigate the effects of reducing the shielding gas consumption in gas metal arc welding (GMAW). A number of claims have been made as to potential shielding gas savings in the GMAW process when using gas-saving devices such as commercially available self-regulating valves. However, the literature and data available on weld quality obtained as a result of reducing the shielding gas flow rate is not readily available, so the thrust of this study is to present a new body of data to report on the technical and economic merits of controlling the shielding gas flow rate using (a) a conventional flow meter and (b) a ‘new to market’ self-regulating gas-saving device. It has been determined that, in a draft-free environment, the shielding gas flow rate can be reduced to 6 L/min without diminishing weld quality, although a lower flow rate was more susceptible to the effects of cross-drafts, and the weld quality level was compromised. In addition to the economic savings associated with reducing the shielding gas flow rate, there are several weld aspects that have been found to be influenced by the shielding gas flow rate including penetration, leg length, distortion and peak temperature, thus suggesting that the heat transfer efficiency is affected by the shielding gas flow rate. This significant finding supports the view that there is scope to increase the travel speed when implementing a lower flow rate and, consequently, enhance productivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Campbell SW, Galloway AM, McPherson NA (2012) Artificial neural network prediction of weld geometry performed using GMAW with alternating shielding gases. Weld J (in press)

  2. Campbell SW, Galloway AM, McPherson NA (2011) Techno-economic evaluation on the effects of alternating shielding gases for advanced joining processes. Proceedings of IMechE Part B: J Eng Manuf 225:1863–1872

    Google Scholar 

  3. Campbell SW, Galloway AM, McPherson NA, Gillies A (2012) Evaluation of gas metal arc welding with alternating shielding gases for use on AA6082T6. Proc IMechE, J Eng Manuf (in press)

  4. Chang YH (2006) Improve GMAW and GTAW with alternating shield gases. Weld J 85(2):41–43

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kang BY, Prasad YKDV, Kang MJ, Kim HJ, Kim IS (2009) Characteristics of alternate supply of shielding gas in aluminium GMA welding. J Mater Process Technol 209:4716–4121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kang BY, Prasad YKDV, Kang MJ, Kim HJ, Kim IS (2009) The effect of alternate supply of shielding gases in austenite stainless steel GTA welding. J Mater Process Technol 209:4722–4127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Marya M, Edwards GR, Liu S (2004) An investigation on the effects of gases in GTA welding of a wrought AZ80 magnesium alloy. Weld J 83(7):203–212

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tani G, Campana G, Fortunato A, Ascari A (2007) The influence of shielding gas in hybrid laser-MIG welding. Appl Surf Sci 253:8050–8053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Galloway AM, McPherson NA, Baker TN (2011) An evaluation of weld metal nitrogen retention and properties in 316LN austenitic stainless steel. J Mater Des Appl 225(2):61–69

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gillies A, Galloway AM, McPherson NA (2011) Helium additions to MIG shielding gas—an economic option? Weld Cut 10(2):118–121

    Google Scholar 

  11. Industries L (2010) New welding gas innovation. Australasian Weld J 55(1):10–11

    Google Scholar 

  12. Uttrachi GD (2007) GMAW shielding gas flow control systems. Weld J 86(4):22–23

    Google Scholar 

  13. Skovfo JL, Jørgensen AH (2011) Optimizing gas usage in arc welding. Presented at JOM 16 Conference, May 2011, Helsingø.

  14. Goldsberry C (2008) Preventing shielding gas waste can boost the bottom line. Weld Des Fabr 81(1):22–23

    Google Scholar 

  15. Weber R (2003) How to save 20% on welding costs. Trailer-Body Builders 44(3)

  16. Standifer LR (2000) Shielding gas consumption efficiency. Fabricator 30(6)

  17. Stauffer HV (1982) Apparatus and method for reducing the waste of welding gas. US Patent Number 4,341,237.

  18. Hanby SK (2002) Apparatus and method for preventing gas-surge in a welding gas delivery system. US Patent Number 6,390,134,B1.

  19. Uttrachi GD (2003) Welding shielding gas saver device. US Patent Number 6,610,957,B2.

  20. Uttrachi GD (2006) Welding shielding gas saver flow-control device. US Patent Number 7,015,412,B1.

  21. McPherson NA, MacPherson MJ, Galloway AM, Gillies A, Campbell SW, Scanlon T, Moir A, Moore AJ, Wu T (2011) GMAW gas shielding—economic savings without detriment to quality. Proceedings of the Annual International Conference on Materials Science. Metal & Manufacturing (M3 2011), 12–13 December 2011, Singapore. GSTF, pp. 65–70.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. W. Campbell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Campbell, S.W., Galloway, A.M. & McPherson, N.A. Techno-economic evaluation of reducing shielding gas consumption in GMAW whilst maintaining weld quality. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 63, 975–985 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-3961-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-3961-2

Keywords

Navigation