Abstract
We analyze the determinants and regional implications of internal migration flows across Danish municipalities in 2006–2012. Besides assessing the role of labor market and housing market factors in driving a region’s net migration rate, we particularly focus on agglomeration factors identified by “new” migration theories related to regional growth models and the new economic geography. The work contributes to the field in the following way: we extend the scarce literature on the different channels through which agglomeration economies act as an attractor for mobile labor. Moreover, we account for the role of space–time dynamic adjustment processes and simultaneity among migration and labor market variables and finally test for heterogeneity in the migration response to regional labor market disparities among low- and high-skilled migrants. Our results support the view that agglomeration economies are indeed key drivers of internal migration flows in Denmark. That is, while we obtain mixed evidence with regard to the role of traditional labor and housing market variables, most of the included proxies for agglomeration economies such as the region’s population density, patent intensity, endowment with human capital as well as the region’s employment share of knowledge-intensive services are positively correlated with the region’s net in-migration rate. Regarding the regional implications of internal migration flows, the results hint at a process of cumulative causation for the time period of analysis running from agglomeration economies to the inflow of mobile labor and subsequent regional income development.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
See information provided by Elhorst (2014) for download at: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php?title=File:Gross-_domestic_expenditure_on_R%26D_by_country_2005_and_2011.png&filetimestamp=20131028145400 (last accessed October 4, 2014).
Dall Schmidt and Sandholt Jensen (2013) consider whether international migration to Danish regions creates new job opportunities for the incumbent workers.
Related to the above discussion, the spatial mobility of labor is also at the heart of different regional growth theories with a focus on the infusion of new or different human capital structures. Endogenous growth models stress the importance of human capital and innovation as a growth driver through spillover effects (Romer 1986, 1990, 1994; Nijkamp and Poot 1998; Baldwin and Martin 2004). Human capital and innovation are rival but may only in part be excludable and therefore result in spillovers. This could take the form of worker productivity depending on the aggregate human capital level (Lucas 1988) or that workers with more human capital generate more innovations (Romer 1990). Human capital externalities in the form of learning spillovers may occur as a result from social learning (Marshall 1890; Jovanovic and Rob 1989; Glaeser 1999).
As default value, we have chosen a one-period time lag for the set of regressors.
The latter transformed variable can be interpreted as follows: taking the unemployment rate as an example, the regional difference in the unemployment rate (\({\tilde{u}}_{i,t} )\) is the log of the ratio of the unemployment rate in municipality i and the Danish average unemployment rate (excluding municipality i). Thus, for the capital region of Copenhagen in 2012, the relative regional unemployment rate is \(\log (7.8\,\%/5.8\,\%)=\log (1.343)\).
In order to arrive at a matrix matching with the overall number of sample observations, we use the transformation \(\mathbf{I}_T \otimes \mathbf{I}_S \otimes \mathbf{W}\), where \(\mathbf{I}_T \) and \(\mathbf{I}_S \) are identity matrices of dimension T and S, respectively.
Here, \(\sigma ^{2}\) is the corrected variance term of the Lee and Yu (2010) ML estimator.
We only use 95 municipalities out of the total of 98 municipalities. This is caused by data restrictions for the small island municipalities Fanø, Samsø and Læsø.
The reform specifically split a number of the 270 municipalities and assigned only parts of these to one of the new 98 municipalities. An aggregation procedure arriving from 270 municipalities to 98 municipalities prior to 2006 is therefore not accessible.
The overall sample size is thus 95 municipalities \(\times \) 6 years \(\times \) 4 education strata = 2280 observations.
See Maraut et al. (2008) for a documentation of the RegPat database.
Due to a general “crisis awareness” in the population following a public debate on problems with productivity in Denmark, union members and unions were in general more concerned with maintaining employment than increasing wages. Unions’ being concerned with maintaining employment is not new, as it is also reflected in some of the thoughts on organizing the Danish labor market at the meeting of the economic council of cooperation on May 6, 1977, with participation of the major union organization. Retaining wage demands is seen as a vehicle of securing jobs or decrease job depletion in crisis time.
Excluding the already introduced high-tech manufacturing and knowledge-intensive service industries. The need to control for employment-based specialization patterns as a source for unobserved regional heterogeneity has been previously pointed out by Robson (2009).
Detailed results for each interaction term are not reported in Table 3 but can be obtained from the authors upon request.
Non-spatial DFE estimation results can be obtained from the authors upon request. As for the migration equation, both the DFE and SDM-DFE approach obtain parameter estimates of similar magnitude and statistical significance for the regressors’ direct effects.
References
Alecke B, Mitze T, Untiedt G (2010) Internal migration, regional labour market dynamics and implications for German East-West disparities: results from a Panel VAR. Rev Reg Res 30(2):159–189
Anselin L, Le Gallo L, Jayet H (2007) Spatial panel econometrics. In: Matyas L, Sevestre P (eds) The econometrics of panel data fundamentals and recent developments in theory and practice. Springer, Berlin
Baltagi BH (2008) Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, 4th edn. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken
Baldwin RE, Martin P (2004) Agglomeration and regional growth. Handb Reg Urban Econ 4:2671–2711
Baldwin RE, Forslid R (2000) The core-periphery model and endogenous growth: stabilizing and destabilizing integration. Economica 67(267):307–24
Bitter C (2008) Geography, housing prices, and interregional migration. Dissertation, The Faculty of the Department of Geography and Regional Development, University of Arizona
Borjas GJ (1987) Self-Selection and earnings of immigrants. Am Econ Rev 77(4):531–553
Brakman S, Garretsen H, van Marrewijk C (2009) The new introduction to geographical economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Brettel CB, Hollifield JF (2000) Migration theory; talking across disciplines. Routledge, London
Capello R (2007) Regional economics. Routledge, London
Card D (2001) Immigrant inflows, native outflows, and the local market impacts of higher immigration. J Labor Econ 19(1):22–64
Carlino G (1979) Increasing returns to scale in metropolitan manufacturing. J Reg Sci 19:363–373
Chasco Yrigoyen C, Lopez A, Guillain R (2012) The Influence of Geography on the Spatial Agglomeration of Production in the European Union. Spat Econ Anal 7(2):247–263
Coulombe S (2006) Internal Migration, Asymmetric Shocks and Interprovincial Economic Adjustments in Canada. Intern Reg Sci Rev 29(2):199–223
Crozet M (2004) Do migrants follow market potentials? An estimation of a new economic geography model. J Econ Geogr 4:439–458
Dall Schmidt T, Sandholt Jensen P (2013) Foreign labor and regional labor markets: aggregate and disaggregate impact on growth and wages in Danish regions. Ann Reg Sci 50:809–840
Elhorst JP (2014) Matlab Software for Spatial Panels. Intern Reg Sci Rev 37(3):389–405
Eurostat (2014) Science, technology and innovation in Europe-R&D expenditure: tables and figures, European Commission. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php?title=File:Gross-_domestic_expenditure_on_R%26D_by_country_2005_and_2011. Accessed 4 Oct 2014
Etzo I (2011) The determinants of recent interregional migration flows in Italy: a panel data analysis. J Reg Sci 51(5):948–966
Evers G (1989) Simultaneous models for migration and commuting: macro and micro economic approaches. In: van Dijk J et al (eds) Migration and labour market adjustment. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Fu Y, Gabriel S (2012) Labor migration, human capital agglomeration and regional development in China. Reg Sci Urban Econ 42:473–484
Faggian A, McCann P (2009a) Universities, Agglomerations and Graduate Human Capital Mobility. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 100(2):210–223
Faggian A, McCann P (2009b) Human capital, graduate migration and innovation in British regions. Camb J Econ 33:317–333
Fratesi U, Percoco M (2014) Selective migration, regional growth and convergence: evidence from Italy. Reg Stud 48(10):1650–1668
Forslid R (1999) Agglomeration with human and physical capital: An analytically solvable case. CEPR Discussion Paper 2102, Centre for Policy Research
Fotheringham A (1983) A new set of spatial-interaction models: the theory of competing destinations. Environ Plan A 15:15–36
Gabriel S, Shack-Marquez J, Wascher W (1992) Regional house-price dispersion and interregional migration. J Hous Econ 2:235–256
Greenwood MJ, Hunt GL, Rickman DS, Treyz GI (1991) Migration, regional equilibrium, and the estimation of compensating differentials. Am Econ Rev 81(5):1382–1390
Glaeser EL (1999) Learning in cities. J Urban Econ 46(2):254–277
Hagen-Zanker J (2008) Why do people migrate? A review of the theoretical literature. MPRA Paper No. 28197, University Library of Munich, Germany
Harris J, Todaro M (1970) Migration, unemployment and development: a two sector analysis. Am Econ Rev 60:126–142
Hunt J, Gauthier-Loiselle M (2012) How much does immigration boost innovation? NBER Working Paper No. 14312
Hu P, Pooler J (2002) An empirical test of the competing destinations model. J Geogr Sys 4:301–323
Jovanovic B, Rob R (1989) The growth and diffusion of knowledge. Rev Econ Stud 56(4):569–582
Kiviet J (1995) On bias, inconsistency, and efficiency of various estimators in dynamic panel data models. J Econom 68:53–78
Knapp TA, Gravest PE (1989) On the role of amenities in models of migration and regional development. J Reg Sci 29(1):71–87
Kubis A (2005) Sectoral Movement as an Incentive for Interregional Migration. ERSA Conference Paper No. ersa05p66, European Regional Science Association
Krugman P (1991) Increasing returns and economic geography. J Polit Econ 99(3):483–499
Lambert DM, Xu W, Florax RJGM (2014) Partial adjustment analysis of income and jobs, and growth regimes in the Appalachian region with smooth transition spatial process models. Int Reg Sci Rev 37(3):328–364
Lee L, Yu J (2010) A spatial dynamic panel data model with both time and individual fixed effects. Econom Theory 26(02):564–597
LeSage J, Pace RK (2009) Introduction to spatial econometrics. CRC Press, New York
Lopez F, Matilla-Garcia M, Mur J, Ruiz M (2011) Testing for the hypothesis of independence in spatio-temporal data. Pap Reg Sci 90(3):663–685
Lucas RE (1988) On the mechanisms of economic development. J Monet Econ 22(1):3–42
Maraut S, Dernis H, Webb C, Spiezia V, Guellec D (2008) The OECD RegPat database: a presentation. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers No. 2008/02, OECD Publishing
Marshall A (1890) Principles of economics. Macmillan, London
Moran P (1950) Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika 37:17–23
Mitze T, Reinkowski J (2011) Testing the neoclassical migration model: overall and age-group specific results for German regions. J Labour Market Res 43(4):277–297
Napolitano O, Bonasia M (2012) Determinants of interregional migration flows: the role of environmental factors in the Italian case. Manch Sch 80(4):525–544
Niebuhr A (2010) Migration and innovation: does cultural diversity matter for regional R&D activity? Pap Reg Sci 89(3):563–585
Nickell S (1981) Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica 49:1417–1426
Nijkamp P, Poot J (1998) Spatial perspectives on new theories of economic growth. Ann Reg Sci 32(1):7–37
Ozgen C, Nijkamp P, Poot J (2009) The effect of migration on income growth and convergence: meta-analytic evidence. IZA Discussion Paper No. 4522
Parrotta P, Pozzoli D, Pytlikova M (2014) The nexus between labor diversity and firm’s innovation. J Popul Econ 27(2):303–364
Pesaran MH (2004) General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. IZA Discussion Paper No. 1240, Institute for the Study of Labor
Pons J, Paluzie E, Silvestre J, Tirado D (2007) Testing the new economic geography: migrations and industrial agglomerations in Spain. J Reg Sci 47(2):289–313
Potepan M (1994) Intermetropolitan migration and housing prices: simultaneously determined? J Hous Econ 3(2):77–91
Puhani (2001) Labour mobility—an adjustment mechanism in Euroland? German Econ Rev 2(2):127–140
Ritsilä J, Ovaskainen M (2001) Migration and regional centralization of human capital. Appl Econ 33(3):317–325
Robson M (2009) Structural change, specialization and regional labor market performance: evidence for the UK. Appl Econ 41(3):275–293
Romer PM (1986) Increasing returns and long-run growth. J Polit Econ 94(5):1002–1037
Romer PM (1990) Endogenous technological change. J Polit Econ 98(5):S71–S102
Romer PM (1994) The origins of endogenous growth. J Econ Persp 8(1):3–22
Saks RE, Wozniak A (2011) Labor reallocation over the business cycle: new evidence from internal migration. J Labor Econ 29(4):697–739
Schmidt P (2013) The EU structural funds as a means to hamper migration. Rev Reg Res 33(1):73–99
Silvestre J (2005) Internal migrations in Spain, 1877–1930. Eur Rev Econ Hist 9(2):233–265
Sjaastad L (1962) The costs and returns of human migration. J Polit Econ 70:80–93
Stark O (1991) The migration of labor. Blackwell, Oxford
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank three anonymous referees for valuable comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. We also acknowledge the advice and support given by the guest editors of the special issue “The Geography of Innovation”, Mikaela Backman and Hans Lööf.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mitze, T., Schmidt, T.D. Internal migration, regional labor markets and the role of agglomeration economies. Ann Reg Sci 55, 61–101 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-015-0683-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-015-0683-z