Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Treatment of full-thickness cartilage lesions and early OA using large condyle resurfacing prosthesis: UniCAP®

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

The UniCAP® implant for femoral resurfacing treatment of large cartilage lesions and early OA was introduced in 2006. The outcome of the present study is from a prospective cohort study of 64 patients, followed 2 years clinically and 7 years for revisions.

Methods

From 2009 to 2013, 64 patients were treated with femoral resurfacing using the UniCAP implant. Indication for treatment with UniCAP implant was symptomatic huge cartilage lesion or early OA at the femoral condyle demonstrated by MRI or arthroscopy, which was ICRS grades 3–4 and more than 4 cm2. There were 28 males and 36 females with a median age of 51 (range 35–65) years. Patients were followed for 2 years clinically with Knee Society subjective outcome scores (KSS), pain scores and radiographic evaluations and for 7 years with complications and reoperations.

Results

At 2 years, the follow-up mean KSS improved from 49 (6.9) to 88 (17.1), the mean KSS function score improved from 46 (8.0) to 90 (17.1), and the mean Pain score improved from 7.4 (0.5) to 2.3 (1.4). 47 % of the implants were revised within 7 years to arthroplasty due to the progression of cartilage lesions, progressing of osteoarthritis or increased knee pain. The reoperation rate did not show any significant difference between females and males. The Kaplan–Meier survival rate was 50 % at 7 years, no difference among females and males.

Conclusion

The present study demonstrated an improved subjective outcome and reduced pain after femoral resurfacing using the UniCAP® implant in a relatively large cohort of patients with symptomatic large cartilage lesions or early OA. A 47 % reoperation rate with conversion to arthroplasty was found. The femoral resurfacing implantation can be a temporary treatment for large cartilage lesions or early OA that is expected to develop into osteoarthritis. For younger patients who are ineligible for arthroplasty treatment, this implant can offer a temporary solution.

Level of evidence

IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (2013) Annual report, pp 108–109

  2. Becher C, Huber R, Thermann H, Ezechieli L, Ostermeier S, Wellmann M, von Skrbensky G (2011) Effects of a surface matching articular resurfacing device on tibiofemoral contact pressure: results from continuous dynamic flexion-extension cycles. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131:413–419

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Becher C, Kalbe C, Thermann H, Paessler HH, Laprell H, Kaiser T, Fechner A, Bartsch S, Windhagen H, Ostermeier S (2011) Minimum 5-year results of focal articular prosthetic resurfacing for the treatment of full-thickness articular cartilage defects in the knee. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131:1135–1143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bollars P, Bosquet M, Vandekerckhove B, Hardeman F, Bellemans J (2012) Prosthetic inlay resurfacing for the treatment of focal, full thickness cartilage defects of the femoral condyle: a bridge between biologics and conventional arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:1753–1759

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brennan SA, Devitt BM, O’Neill CJ, Nicholson P (2013) Focal femoral condyle resurfacing. Bone Joint J 95-B:301–304

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cicuttini F, Ding C, Wluka A, Davis S, Ebeling PR, Jones G (2005) Association with cartilage defects with loss of knee cartilage in healthy, middle-age adults: a prospective study. Arthritis Rheum 52:2033–2039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Danish Orthopaedic Association (DOS) (2013) National Joint Replacement Registry (DKR) Annual report

  8. Guettler JH, Demetropoulos CK, Yang KH, Jurist KA (2004) Osteochondral defects in the human knee:influence of defect size on cartilage rim stress and load redistribution to surrounding cartilage. Am J Sports Med 32(6):1451–1458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Görtz S, Bugbee WD (2006) Allografts in articular cartilage repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(6):1374–1384

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hangody L, Fules P (2003) Autologous osteochondral mosaicplasty for the treatment of full-thickness defects of weight-bearing joints: ten years of experimental and clinical experience. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85A(Suppl 2):25–32

    Google Scholar 

  11. Heir S, Nerhus TK, Rotterud JH, Loken S, Ekeland A, Engebretsen L, Aroen A (2010) Focal cartilage defects in the knee impair quality of life as much as severe osteoarthritis: a comparison of knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score in 4 patient categories scheduled for knee surgery. Am J Sports Med 38:231–237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hjelle K, Solheim E, Strand T, Muri R, Brittberg M (2002) Articular cartilage defects in 1.000 knee arthroscopies. Arthroscopy 18(7):730–734

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS (1957) Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 16(4):494–502

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Kirker-Head CA, Van Sickle DC, Ek SW, McCool JC (2006) Safety of, and biological and functional response to, a novel metallic implant for the management of focal full-thickness cartilage defects: preliminary assessment in an animal model out to 1 year. J Orthop Res 24:1095–1108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kreuz PC, Erggelet C, Steinwachs MR, Krause SJ, Lahm A, Niemeyer P, Ghanem N, Uhl M, Sudkamp N (2006) Is microfracture of chondral defects in the knee associated with different results in patients aged 40 years or younger? Arthroscopy 22:1180–1186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kreuz PC, Steinwachs MR, Erggelet C, Krause SJ, Konrad G, Uhl M, Südkamp N (2006) Results after microfracture of full-thickness chondral defects in different compartments in the knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 14(11):1119–1125

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Laprell H, Petersen W (2001) Autologous osteochondral transplantation using the diamond bone-cutting system (DBCS): 6-12 years’ follow-up of 35 patients with osteochondral defects at the knee joint. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 121(5):248–253

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Laursen JO, Lind M (2015) Treatment of full-thickness femoral cartilage lesions using condyle resurfacing prosthesis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi:1007/s00167-05-3726-1

  19. Li CS, Karlsson J, Winemaker M, Sancheti P, Bhandari M (2014) Orthopedic surgeons feel that there is a treatment gap in management of early OA: international survey. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22(2):363–378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. London NJ, Miller LE, Block JE (2011) Clinical and economic consequences of the treatment gap in knee osteoarthritis management. Med Hypotheses 76:887–892

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Micheli LJ, Browne JE, Erggelet CF, Fu F, Mandelbaum B, Moseley JB, Zurakowski D (2001) Autologous chondrocyte implantation of the knee: multicenter experience and minimum 3-year follow-up. Clin J Sports Med 11(4):223–228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Miniaci A (2014) UniCAP as an alternative for unicompartmental arthritis. Clin Sports Med 33(1):57–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mithoefer K, Williams RJ 3rd, Warren RF, Potter HG, Spock CR, Jones EC (2005) The microfracture technique for the treatment of articular cartilage lesions in the knee: a prospective cohort study. JBJS Am 87(9):1911–1920

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Morelli M, Nagamori J, Miniaci A (2002) Management of chondral injuries of the knee by osteochondral autogenous transfer (mosaicplasty). J Knee Surg 15:185–190

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Skrbensky G, Becher C, Schmidt M (2008) Resurfacing for sportive patients: HemiCAP results and biomechanic in vitro tests. In: SICOT/SIROT 2008 XXIV triennial world congress, 24–28 August 2008, Hong Kong

  26. Steadman JR, Briggs KK, Rodrigo JJ, Kocher MS, Gill TJ, Rodkey WG (2003) Outcomes of microfracture for traumatic chondral defects of the knee: 11-year follow-up. J Arthroscopy 19:477–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Orthopedic division, Emergency Department, Sygehus Sønderjylland, Kresten Philipsensvej 15, 6200, Aabenraa, Denmark

    Jens Ole Laursen

Authors
  1. Jens Ole Laursen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jens Ole Laursen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Laursen, J.O. Treatment of full-thickness cartilage lesions and early OA using large condyle resurfacing prosthesis: UniCAP® . Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24, 1695–1701 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4000-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4000-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation