Skip to main content
Log in

Radiographic identification of the primary structures of the ankle syndesmosis

  • Ankle
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to quantitatively describe the locations of the syndesmotic ligaments and the tibiofibular articulating cartilage surfaces on standard radiographic views using reproducible radiographic landmarks and reference axes.

Methods

Twelve non-paired ankles were dissected to identify the anterior–inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL), posterior–inferior tibiofibular ligament (PITFL), interosseous tibiofibular ligament (ITFL), and the cartilage surfaces of the syndesmosis. Structures were marked with 2-mm radiopaque spheres prior to obtaining lateral and mortise radiographs. Measurements were performed by two independent raters to assess intra- and interobserver reliability via intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).

Results

Measurements demonstrated excellent agreement between observers and across trials (all ICCs ≥ 0.960). On the lateral view, the AITFL tibial origin was 9.6 ± 1.5 mm superior and posterior to the anterior tibial plafond. Its fibular insertion was 4.4 ± 1.7 mm superior and posterior to the anterior fibular tubercle. The centre of the tibial cartilage facet of the tibiofibular contact zone was 8.4 ± 2.1 mm posterior and superior to the anterior plafond. The proximal and distal aspects of the ITFL tibial attachment were 45.9 ± 7.9 and 12.4 ± 3.4 mm proximal to the central plafond, respectively. The superficial and deep PITFL coursed anterior and distally from the posterior tibia to fibula. On the mortise view, the AITFL tibial attachment centre was 5.6 ± 2.4 mm lateral and superior to the lateral extent of the plafond (4.3 mm lateral, 3.3 mm superior), and its fibular insertion was 21.2 ± 2.1 mm superior and medial to the inferior tip of the lateral malleolus.

Conclusions

Quantitative radiographic guidelines describing the locations of the primary syndesmotic structures demonstrated excellent reliability and reproducibility. Defined guidelines provide additional clinically relevant information regarding the radiographic anatomy of the syndesmosis and may assist with preoperative planning, augment intraoperative navigation, and provide additional means for objective postoperative assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bartonícek J (2003) Anatomy of the tibiofibular syndesmosis and its clinical relevance. Surg Radiol Anat 25(5–6):379–386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bassett FH III, Gates HS III, Billys JB, Morris HB, Nikolaou PK (1990) Talar impingement by the anteroinferior tibiofibular ligament. A cause of chronic pain in the ankle after inversion sprain. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72(1):55–59

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bava E, Charlton T, Thordarson D (2010) Ankle fracture syndesmosis fixation and management: the current practice of orthopedic surgeons. Am J Orthop 39(5):242–246

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Beumer A, Heijboer RP, Fontijne WP, Swierstra BA (2000) Late reconstruction of the anterior distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: good outcome in 9 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 71(5):519–521

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Beumer A, van Hemert WL, Niesing R, Entius CA, Ginai AZ, Mulder PG, Swierstra BA (2004) Radiographic measurement of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis has limited use. Clin Orthop Relat Res 423:227–234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bonnin JG (1970) Injuries to the ankle. Hafner Pub. Co., Darien

    Google Scholar 

  7. Boytim MJ, Fischer DA, Neumann L (1991) Syndesmotic ankle sprains. Am J Sports Med 19(3):294–298

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Candal-Couto JJ, Burrow D, Bromage S, Briggs PJ (2004) Instability of the tibio-fibular syndesmosis: have we been pulling in the wrong direction? Injury 35(8):814–818

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Davidovitch RI, Weil Y, Karia R, Forman J, Looze C, Liebergall M, Egol K (2013) Intraoperative syndesmotic reduction: three-dimensional versus standard fluoroscopic imaging. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(20):1838–1843

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ebraheim NA, Taser F, Shafiq Q, Yeasting RA (2006) Anatomical evaluation and clinical importance of the tibiofibular syndesmosis ligaments. Surg Radiol Anat 28(2):142–149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ebraheim NA, Lu J, Yang H, Mekhail AO, Yeasting RA (1997) Radiographic and CT evaluation of tibiofibular syndesmotic diastasis: a cadaver study. Foot Ankle Int 18(11):693–698

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gardner MJ, Demetrakopoulos D, Briggs SM, Helfet DL, Lorich DG (2006) Malreduction of the tibiofibular syndesmosis in ankle fractures. Foot Ankle Int 27(10):788–792

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gerber JP, Williams GN, Scoville CR, Arciero RA, Taylor DC (1998) Persistent disability associated with ankle sprains: a prospective examination of an athletic population. Foot Ankle Int 19(10):653–660

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Grass R, Rammelt S, Biewener A, Zwipp H (2003) Peroneus longus ligamentoplasty for chronic instability of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Foot Ankle Int 24(5):392–397

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hamid N, Loeffler BJ, Braddy W, Kellam JF, Cohen BE, Bosse MJ (2009) Outcome after fixation of ankle fractures with an injury to the syndesmosis: the effect of the syndesmosis screw. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(8):1069–1073

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Haytmanek CT, Williams BT, James EW, Campbell KJ, Wijdicks CA, LaPrade RF, Clanton TO (2015) Radiographic identification of the primary lateral ankle structures. Am J Sports Med 43(1):79–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hopkinson WJ, St Pierre P, Ryan JB, Wheeler JH (1990) Syndesmosis sprains of the ankle. Foot Ankle 10(6):325–330

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hsu AR, Gross CE, Lee S (2013) Intraoperative O-arm computed tomography evaluation of syndesmotic reduction: case report. Foot Ankle Int 34(5):753–759

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hunt KJ, George E, Harris AH, Dragoo JL (2013) Epidemiology of syndesmosis injuries in intercollegiate football: incidence and risk factors from National Collegiate Athletic Association injury surveillance system data from 2004–2005 to 2008–2009. Clin J Sports Med 23(4):278–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Johannsen AM, Anderson CJ, Wijdicks CA, Engebretsen L, LaPrade RF (2013) Radiographic landmarks for tunnel positioning in posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Am J Sports Med 41(1):35–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lui TH (2010) Tri-ligamentous reconstruction of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: a minimally invasive approach. J Foot Ankle Surg 49(5):495–500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Manjoo A, Sanders DW, Tieszer C, MacLeod MD (2010) Functional and radiographic results of patients with syndesmotic screw fixation: implications for screw removal. J Orthop Trauma 24(1):2–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Marmor M, Hansen E, Han HK, Buckley J, Matityahu A (2011) Limitations of standard fluoroscopy in detecting rotational malreduction of the syndesmosis in an ankle fracture model. Foot Ankle Int 32(6):616–622

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. McBryde A, Chiasson B, Wilhelm A, Donovan F, Ray T, Bacilla P (1997) Syndesmotic screw placement: a biomechanical analysis. Foot Ankle Int 18(5):262–266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Miller AN, Barei DP, Iaquinto JM, Ledoux WR, Beingessner DM (2013) Iatrogenic syndesmosis malreduction via clamp and screw placement. J Orthop Trauma 27(2):100–106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Miller RS, Weinhold PS, Dahners LE (1999) Comparison of tricortical screw fixation versus a modified suture construct for fixation of ankle syndesmosis injury: a biomechanical study. J Orthop Trauma 13(1):39–42

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Montagne J, Chevrot A, Galmiche JM, Chafetz N (eds) (1983) Atlas of foot radiology. Mason Publishing, New York

    Google Scholar 

  28. Morris MW, Rice P, Schneider TE (2009) Distal tibiofibular syndesmosis reconstruction using a free hamstring autograft. Foot Ankle Int 30(6):506–511

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mukhopadhyay S, Metcalfe A, Guha AR, Mohanty K, Hemmadi S, Lyons K, O’Doherty D (2011) Malreduction of syndesmosis—are we considering the anatomical variation? Injury 42(10):1073–1076

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Naqvi GA, Cunningham P, Lynch B, Galvin R, Awan N (2012) Fixation of ankle syndesmotic injuries: comparison of tightrope fixation and syndesmotic screw fixation for accuracy of syndesmotic reduction. Am J Sports Med 40(12):2828–2835

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Nielson JH, Gardner MJ, Peterson MG, Sallis JG, Potter HG, Helfet DL, Lorich DG (2005) Radiographic measurements do not predict syndesmotic injury in ankle fractures: an MRI study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 436:216–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Phisitkul P, Ebinger T, Goetz J, Vaseenon T, Marsh JL (2012) Forceps reduction of the syndesmosis in rotational ankle fractures: a cadaveric study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94(24):2256–2261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Pietrini SD, LaPrade RF, Griffith CJ, Wijdicks CA, Ziegler CG (2009) Radiographic identification of the primary posterolateral knee structures. Am J Sports Med 37(3):542–551

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Pietrini SD, Ziegler CG, Anderson CJ, Wijdicks CA, Westerhaus BD, Johansen S, Engebretsen L, LaPrade RF (2011) Radiographic landmarks for tunnel positioning in double-bundle ACL reconstructions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(5):792–800

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rammelt S, Zwipp H, Grass R (2008) Injuries to the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: an evidence-based approach to acute and chronic lesions. Foot Ankle Clin 13(4):611–633

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ramsey PL, Hamilton W (1976) Changes in tibiotalar area of contact caused by lateral talar shift. J Bone Joint Surg Am 58(3):356–357

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sagi HC, Shah AR, Sanders RW (2012) The functional consequence of syndesmotic joint malreduction at a minimum 2-year follow-up. J Orthop Trauma 26(7):439–443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86(2):420–428

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sikka RS, Fetzer GB, Sugarman E, Wright RW, Fritts H, Boyd JL, Fischer DA (2012) Correlating MRI findings with disability in syndesmotic sprains of NFL players. Foot Ankle Int 33(5):371–378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Song DJ, Lanzi JT, Groth AT, Drake M, Orchowski JR, Shaha SH, Lindell KK (2014) The effect of syndesmosis screw removal on the reduction of the distal tibiofibular joint: a prospective radiographic study. Foot Ankle Int 35(6):543–548

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Thordarson DB, Motamed S, Hedman T, Ebramzadeh E, Bakshian S (1997) The effect of fibular malreduction on contact pressures in an ankle fracture malunion model. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79(12):1809–1815

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Westermann RW, Rungprai C, Goetz JE, Femino J, Amendola A, Phisitkul P (2014) The effect of suture-button fixation on simulated syndesmotic malreduction: a cadaveric study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96(20):1732–1738

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Wijdicks CA, Griffith CJ, LaPrade RF, Johansen S, Sunderland A, Arendt EA, Engebretsen L (2009) Radiographic identification of the primary medial knee structures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(3):521–529

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Williams BT, Ahrberg AB, Goldsmith MT, Campbell KJ, Shirley L, Wijdicks CA, LaPrade RF, Clanton TO (2015) Ankle syndesmosis: a qualitative and quantitative anatomic analysis. Am J Sports Med 43(1):88–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Yasui Y, Takao M, Miyamoto W, Innami K, Matsushita T (2011) Anatomical reconstruction of the anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament for chronic disruption of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(4):691–695

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Zalavras C, Thordarson D (2007) Ankle syndesmotic injury. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 15(6):330–339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Zamzami MM, Zamzam MM (2009) Chronic isolated distal tibiofibular syndesmotic disruption: diagnosis and management. Foot Ankle Surg 15(1):14–19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas O. Clanton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Williams, B.T., James, E.W., Jisa, K.A. et al. Radiographic identification of the primary structures of the ankle syndesmosis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24, 1187–1199 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3743-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3743-0

Keywords

Navigation