Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Analgesic efficacy of two interscalene blocks and one cervical epidural block in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

  • Shoulder
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

Despite its effectiveness in other surgeries, studies on continuous epidural block in upper-extremity surgery are rare because of technical difficulties and potential complications. This study compared postoperative analgesic efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided continuous interscalene brachial plexus block (UCISB) and fluoroscopy-guided targeted continuous cervical epidural block (FCCEB) in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR).

Methods

Seventy-five patients were randomly and equally assigned to groups FCCEB (0.2 %), UCISB75 (0.75 %), and UCISB20 (0.2 %) according to the initial ropivacaine dose (8 ml). The background infusion (0.2 % ropivacaine at 5 ml/h), bolus (3 ml of 0.2 % ropivacaine), and lockout time (20 min) were consistent. Respiratory effects [respiratory discomfort (modified Borg scale), ventilatory function, and hemidiaphragmatic excursion (ultrasound)], analgesic quality [pain severity at rest and motion attempt (VAS-R and -M), number of boluses, analgesic supplements, and sleep disturbance], neurologic effects, procedural discomfort, satisfaction, and adverse effects were evaluated preprocedurally and up to 72 h postoperatively.

Results

FCCEB caused less respiratory depression and sensorimotor block, but had less analgesic efficacy than UCISBs (P < 0.05). FCCEB caused nausea, vomiting, and dizziness more frequently (P < 0.05) and had lower patient satisfaction than UCISBs (P < 0.05). UCISB75 can cause severe respiratory distress in patients with lung disorders. Other variables were not significantly different between the groups.

Conclusions

UCISB20 may provide superior postoperative analgesia and is the most recommendable postoperative analgesic method in ARCR.

Level of evidence

Randomized controlled trials, Therapeutic study, Level I.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Antonakakis JG, Sites BD, Shiffrin J (2009) Ultrasound-guided posterior approach for the placement of a continuous interscalene catheter. Reg Anesth Pain Med 34:64–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bedforth NM, Hardman JG (2010) The hidden cost of neuraxial anaesthesia? Anaesth 65:437–439

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bettmann MA (2005) Contrast media: safety, viscosity, and volume. Eur Radiol 15(Suppl 4):D62–D64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bonnet F, Derosier JP, Pluskwa F, Abhay K, Gaillard A (1990) Cervical epidural anaesthesia for carotid artery surgery. Can J Anaesth 37:353–358

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Borene SC, Rosenquist RW, Koorn R, Haider N, Boezaart AP (2003) An indication for continuous cervical paravertebral block (posterior approach to the interscalene space). Anesth Analg 97:898–900

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Borgeat A, Ekatodramis G, Guzzella S, Ruland P, Votta-Velis G, Aguirre J (2012) Deltoid, triceps, or both responses improve the success rate of the interscalene catheter surgical block compared with the biceps response. Br J Anaesth 109:975–980

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Boussuges A, Gole Y, Blanc P (2009) Diaphragmatic motion studied by m-mode ultrasonography: methods, reproducibility, and normal values. Chest 135:391–400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Buchheit T, Crews JC (2000) Lateral cervical epidural catheter placement for continuous unilateral upper extremity analgesia and sympathetic block. Reg Anesth Pain Med 25:313–317

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cho CH, Song KS, Min BW, Jung GH, Lee YK, Shin HK (2015) Efficacy of interscalene block combined with multimodal pain control for postoperative analgesia after rotator cuff repair. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:542–547

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cho YH, Shin SH, Lee DH, Yu EY, Yoon MS (2009) The effect of preoperative interscalene block using low-dose mepivacaine on the postoperative pain after shoulder arthroscopic surgery. Korean J Pain 22:224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Davies RG, Myles PS, Graham JM (2006) A comparison of the analgesic efficacy and side-effects of paravertebral vs epidural blockade for thoracotomy—a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Br J Anaesth 96:418–426

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Forster JG, Niemi TT, Salmenpera MT, Ikonen S, Rosenberg PH (2009) An evaluation of the epidural catheter position by epidural nerve stimulation in conjunction with continuous epidural analgesia in adult surgical patients. Anesth Analg 108:351–358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fredrickson MJ, Krishnan S, Chen CY (2010) Postoperative analgesia for shoulder surgery: a critical appraisal and review of current techniques. Anaesth 65:608–624

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fredrickson MJ, Stewart AW (2008) Continuous interscalene analgesia for rotator cuff repair: a retrospective comparison of effectiveness and cost in 205 patients from a multi-provider private practice setting. Anaesth Intensive Care 36:786–791

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Grider JS, Mullet TW, Saha SP, Harned ME, Sloan PA (2012) A randomized, double-blind trial comparing continuous thoracic epidural bupivacaine with and without opioid in contrast to a continuous paravertebral infusion of bupivacaine for post-thoracotomy pain. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 26:83–89

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ilfeld BM, Moeller LK, Mariano ER, Loland VJ, Stevens-Lapsley JE, Fleisher AS, Girard PJ, Donohue MC, Ferguson EJ, Ball ST (2010) Continuous peripheral nerve blocks: is local anesthetic dose the only factor, or do concentration and volume influence infusion effects as well? Anesthesiology 112:347–354

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ip VH, Tsui BC (2012) Continuous interscalene block: the good, the bad and the refined spread. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 56:526–530

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Joshi GP, Bonnet F, Shah R, Wilkinson RC, Camu F, Fischer B, Neugebauer EA, Rawal N, Schug SA, Simanski C, Kehlet H (2008) A systematic review of randomized trials evaluating regional techniques for postthoracotomy analgesia. Anesth Analg 107:1026–1040

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kehlet H, Jensen TS, Woolf CJ (2006) Persistent postsurgical pain: risk factors and prevention. Lancet 367:1618–1625

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim YI, Nam SG, Hong ST, Kang KS, Park W (2001) Comparison of visual analogue scale, categorical scale and satisfaction for postoperative pain. Korean J Pain 14:156–163

    Google Scholar 

  21. Liu SS, Bieltz M, Wukovits B, John RS (2010) Prospective survey of patient-controlled epidural analgesia with bupivacaine and hydromorphone in 3736 postoperative orthopedic patients. Reg Anesth Pain Med 35:351–354

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. McNaught A, Shastri U, Carmichael N, Awad IT, Columb M, Cheung J, Holtby RM, McCartney CJ (2011) Ultrasound reduces the minimum effective local anaesthetic volume compared with peripheral nerve stimulation for interscalene block. Br J Anaesth 106:124–130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Narouze SN, Govil H, Guirguis M, Mekhail NA (2009) Continuous cervical epidural analgesia for rehabilitation after shoulder surgery: a retrospective evaluation. Pain Physician 12:189–194

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nystrom UM, Nystrom NA (1997) Continuous cervical epidural anesthesia in reconstructive hand surgery. J Hand Surg Am 22:906–912

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Oh JH, Kim WS, Kim JY, Gong HS, Rhee KY (2007) Continuous intralesional infusion combined with interscalene block was effective for postoperative analgesia after arthroscopic shoulder surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16:295–299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Oh JH, Rhee KY, Kim SH, Lee PB, Lee JW, Lee SJ (2009) Comparison of analgesic efficacy between single interscalene block combined with a continuous intra-bursal infusion of ropivacaine and continuous interscalene block after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Clin Orthop Surg 1:48–53

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Prusinkiewicz C, Lang S, Tsui BC (2005) Lateral cervical epidural catheter placement using nerve stimulation for continuous unilateral upper extremity analgesia following a failed continuous peripheral nerve block. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 49:579–582

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rawal N (2012) Epidural technique for postoperative pain: gold standard no more? Reg Anesth Pain Med 37:310–317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Renes SH, van Geffen GJ, Rettig HC, Gielen MJ, Scheffer GJ (2010) Minimum effective volume of local anesthetic for shoulder analgesia by ultrasound-guided block at root C7 with assessment of pulmonary function. Reg Anesth Pain Med 35:529–534

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Riazi S, Carmichael N, Awad I, Holtby RM, McCartney CJ (2008) Effect of local anaesthetic volume (20 vs 5 ml) on the efficacy and respiratory consequences of ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block. Br J Anaesth 101:549–556

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ryu HG, Bahk JH, Lee CJ, Lim YJ (2007) The coiling length of thoracic epidural catheters: the influence of epidural approach angle. Br J Anaesth 98:401–404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Sandefo I, Bernard JM, Elstraete V, Lebrun T, Polin B, Alla F, Poey C, Savorit L (2005) Patient-controlled interscalene analgesia after shoulder surgery: catheter insertion by the posterior approach. Anesth Analg 100:1496–1498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Scarci M, Joshi A, Attia R (2010) In patients undergoing thoracic surgery is paravertebral block as effective as epidural analgesia for pain management? Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 10:92–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Stevens RA, Frey K, Sheikh T, Kao TC, Mikat-Stevens M, Morales M (1998) Time course of the effects of cervical epidural anesthesia on pulmonary function. Reg Anesth Pain Med 23:20–24

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Tsui BC, Bateman K, Bouliane M, Finucane B (2004) Cervical epidural analgesia via a thoracic approach using nerve stimulation guidance in an adult patient undergoing elbow surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med 29:355–360

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Tsui BC, Bury J, Bouliane M, Ganapathy S (2007) Cervical epidural analgesia via a thoracic approach using nerve-stimulation guidance in adult patients undergoing total shoulder replacement surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 51:255–260

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Tuominen M, Pitkanen M, Rosenberg PH (1987) Postoperative pain relief and bupivacaine plasma levels during continuous interscalene brachial plexus block. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 31:276–278

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Urmey WF, McDonald M (1992) Hemidiaphragmatic paresis during interscalene brachial plexus block: effects on pulmonary function and chest wall mechanics. Anesth Analg 74:352–357

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wilson AT, Nicholson E, Burton L, Wild C (2004) Analgesia for day-case shoulder surgery. Br J Anaesth 92:414–415

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Wittich DJ Jr, Berny JJ, Davis RK (1984) Cervical epidural anesthesia for head and neck surgery. Laryngoscope 94:615–619

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Yang CW, Jung SM, Kwon HU, Cho CK, Yi JW, Kim CW, Jung JK, An YM (2010) A clinical comparison of continuous interscalene brachial plexus block with different basal infusion rates of 0.2 % ropivacaine for shoulder surgery. Korean J Anesthesiol 59:27–33

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Chung-Ang University Research Grants in 2011.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chung-Ang University Hospital, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, 224-1 Heukseok-dong, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Jae-Yoon Kim & Kwang-Sup Song

  2. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, 224-1 Heukseok-dong, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Won-Joong Kim, Yong-Hee Park, Hyun Kang, Young-Cheol Woo & Hwa-Yong Shin

Authors
  1. Jae-Yoon Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kwang-Sup Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Won-Joong Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yong-Hee Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hyun Kang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Young-Cheol Woo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Hwa-Yong Shin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hwa-Yong Shin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, JY., Song, KS., Kim, WJ. et al. Analgesic efficacy of two interscalene blocks and one cervical epidural block in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24, 931–939 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3667-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3667-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation