Skip to main content
Log in

Three-dimensional computed tomography evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament footprint for anatomic single-bundle reconstruction

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

Femoral and tibial footprint coordinates have been well studied in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. However, in a single-bundle reconstruction approach, the central coordinate of femoral and tibial footprints have not been determined. The purpose of this study was to describe the central point locations of the ACL footprints visualized by three-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) images and analysed by the quadrant method.

Methods

Eight cadaveric knees were dissected, and the central points of ACL femoral and tibial footprints were marked and analysed using 3D CT images.

Results

In the present study, the means (and standard deviation) of ACL femoral footprint dimensions were in the ventral–dorsal plane and in the cranial–caudal plane 9.4 ± 0.8 and 15.6 ± 0.9 mm, respectively. In the tibial side, the means of ACL footprint dimensions were in the anterior–posterior and in the medial–lateral 18.5 ± 1.9 and 15.5 ± 1.0 mm, respectively. In the tomographic analyses, the means of femoral central location coordinates in the ventral–dorsal (y) and in the cranial–caudal (x) axes were 35.3 ± 4.5 and 30.0 ± 1.6 %, respectively. The means of tibial central location coordinates were in the anterior–posterior (y) and in the medial–lateral (x) axes, respectively: 40.5 ± 5.3 and 50.2 ± 1.3 %, respectively.

Conclusions

These computed tomographic coordinates might help future studies as a reference on ACL single-bundle anatomic reconstruction, with respect to the management of ACL revision surgery or in symptomatic patients after ACL reconstruction. Improvements in three-dimensional image acquisition could facilitate its intraoperative applicability in the coming years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bernard M, Hertel P, Hornung H, Cierpinski T (1997) Femoral insertion of the ACL. Radiographic quadrant method. Am J Knee Surg 10:14–21 discussion 21–22

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brophy RH, Selby RM, Altchek DW (2006) Anterior cruciate ligament revision: double-bundle augmentation of primary vertical graft. Arthroscopy 22(683):e1–e5

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brophy RH, Wright RW, Matava MJ (2009) Cost analysis of converting from single-bundle to double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 37:683–687

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Colombet P, Robinson J, Christel P, Franceschi J-P, Djian P, Bellier G, Sbihi A (2006) Morphology of anterior cruciate ligament attachments for anatomic reconstruction: a cadaveric dissection and radiographic study. Arthroscopy 22:984–992

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ferretti M, Doca D, Ingham SM, Cohen M, Fu FH (2012) Bony and soft tissue landmarks of the ACL tibial insertion site: an anatomical study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:62–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ferretti M, Ekdahl M, Shen W, Fu FH (2007) Osseous landmarks of the femoral attachment of the anterior cruciate ligament: an anatomic study. Arthroscopy 23:1218–1225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Forsythe B, Kopf S, Wong AK, Martins CAQ, Anderst W, Tashman S, Fu FH (2010) The location of femoral and tibial tunnels in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction analyzed by three-dimensional computed tomography models. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:1418–1426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fu FH, Araujo PH, Lin A (2011) Double-bundle ACL reconstruction with use of a single tibial tunnel: a technique or an anatomic concept? J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:e121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gadikota HR, Sim JA, Hosseini A, Gill TJ, Li G (2012) The relationship between femoral tunnels created by the transtibial, anteromedial portal, and outside-in techniques and the anterior cruciate ligament footprint. Am J Sports Med 40:882–888

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Girgis FG, Marshall JL, Monajem A (1975) The cruciate ligaments of the knee joint. Anatomical, functional and experimental analysis. Clin Orthop 106:216–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Good L, Odensten M, Gillquist J (1987) Precision in reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. A new positioning device compared with hand drilling. Acta Orthop Scand 58:658–661

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Harner CD, Baek GH, Vogrin TM, Carlin GJ, Kashiwaguchi S, Woo SL (1999) Quantitative analysis of human cruciate ligament insertions. Arthroscopy 15:741–749

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hussein M, van Eck CF, Cretnik A, Dinevski D, Fu FH (2012) Prospective randomized clinical evaluation of conventional single-bundle, anatomic single-bundle, and anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: 281 cases with 3- to 5-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 40:512–520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ireland ML, Ballantyne BT, Little K, McClay IS (2001) A radiographic analysis of the relationship between the size and shape of the intercondylar notch and anterior cruciate ligament injury. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 9:200–205

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Khalfayan EE, Sharkey PF, Alexander AH, Bruckner JD, Bynum EB (1996) The relationship between tunnel placement and clinical results after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 24:335–341

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kondo E, Merican AM, Yasuda K, Amis AA (2011) Biomechanical comparison of anatomic double-bundle, anatomic single-bundle, and nonanatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Am J Sports Med 39:279–288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kopf S, Forsythe B, Wong AK, Tashman S, Anderst W, Irrgang JJ, Fu FH (2010) Nonanatomic tunnel position in traditional transtibial single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction evaluated by three-dimensional computed tomography. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:1427–1431

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kopf S, Forsythe B, Wong AK, Tashman S, Irrgang JJ, Fu FH (2012) Transtibial ACL reconstruction technique fails to position drill tunnels anatomically in vivo 3D CT study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:2200–2207

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kopf S, Musahl V, Tashman S, Szczodry M, Shen W, Fu FH (2009) A systematic review of the femoral origin and tibial insertion morphology of the ACL. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:213–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee MC, Seong SC, Lee S, Chang CB, Park YK, Jo H, Kim CH (2007) Vertical femoral tunnel placement results in rotational knee laxity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 23:771–778

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lorenz S, Elser F, Mitterer M, Obst T, Imhoff AB (2009) Radiologic evaluation of the insertion sites of the 2 functional bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament using 3-dimensional computed tomography. Am J Sports Med 37:2368–2376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Meuffels DE, Potters J-W, Koning AHJ, Brown CH Jr, Verhaar JAN, Reijman M (2011) Visualization of postoperative anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction bone tunnels: reliability of standard radiographs, CT scans, and 3D virtual reality images. Acta Orthop 82:699–703

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Meuffels DE, Reijman M, Scholten RJ, Verhaar JA (2011) Computer assisted surgery for knee ligament reconstruction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Online CD007601

  24. Mochizuki T, Muneta T, Nagase T, Shirasawa S-I, Akita K-I, Sekiya I (2006) Cadaveric knee observation study for describing anatomic femoral tunnel placement for two-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 22:356–361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Morgan CD, Kalman VR, Grawl DM (1995) Definitive landmarks for reproducible tibial tunnel placement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 11:275–288

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Núñez M, Sastre S, Núñez E, Lozano L, Nicodemo C, Segur JM (2012) Health-related quality of life and direct costs in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury: single-bundle versus double-bundle reconstruction in a low-demand cohort—a randomized trial with 2 years of follow-up. Arthroscopy 28:929–935

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Petersen W, Zantop T (2007) Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament with regard to its two bundles. Clin Orthop Relat Res 454:35–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pinczewski LA, Salmon LJ, Jackson WFM, von Bormann RBP, Haslam PG, Tashiro S (2008) Radiological landmarks for placement of the tunnels in single-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90:172–179

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Purnell ML, Larson AI, Clancy W (2008) Anterior cruciate ligament insertions on the tibia and femur and their relationships to critical bony landmarks using high-resolution volume-rendering computed tomography. Am J Sports Med 36:2083–2090

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rosset A, Spadola L, Pysher L, Ratib O (2006) Informatics in radiology (infoRAD): navigating the fifth dimension: innovative interface for multidimensional multimodality image navigation. Radiography 26:299–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sadoghi P, Kröpfl A, Jansson V, Müller PE, Pietschmann MF, Fischmeister MF (2011) Impact of tibial and femoral tunnel position on clinical results after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 27:355–364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Schafer S, Nithiananthan S, Mirota DJ, Uneri A, Stayman JW, Zbijewski W, Schmidgunst C, Kleinszig G, Khanna AJ, Siewerdsena JH (2011) Mobile C-arm cone-beam CT for guidance of spine surgery: image quality, radiation dose, and integration with interventional guidance. Med Phys 38:4563–4574

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Siebold R, Ellert T, Metz S, Metz J (2008) Tibial insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament: morphometry, arthroscopic landmarks, and orientation model for bone tunnel placement. Arthroscopy 24:154–161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Stäubli HU, Rauschning W (1994) Tibial attachment area of the anterior cruciate ligament in the extended knee position. Anatomy and cryosections in vitro complemented by magnetic resonance arthrography in vivo. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2:138–146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Tállay A, Lim M-H, Bartlett J (2008) Anatomical study of the human anterior cruciate ligament stump’s tibial insertion footprint. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:741–746

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Tiamklang T, Sumanont S, Foocharoen T, Laopaiboon M (2012) Double-bundle versus single-bundle reconstruction for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Online 11:CD008413

  37. Tsukada H, Ishibashi Y, Tsuda E, Fukuda A, Toh S (2008) Anatomical analysis of the anterior cruciate ligament femoral and tibial footprints. J Orthop Sci 13:122–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Van Eck CF, Lesniak BP, Schreiber VM, Fu FH (2010) Anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction flowchart. Arthroscopy 26:258–268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Van Eck CF, Wong AK, Irrgang JJ, Fu FH, Tashman S (2012) The effects of limb alignment on anterior cruciate ligament graft tunnel positions estimated from plain radiographs. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:979–985

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Yasuda K, van Eck CF, Hoshino Y, Fu FH, Tashman S (2011) Anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, part 1: basic science. Am J Sports Med 39:1789–1799

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Zantop T, Kubo S, Petersen W, Musahl V, Fu FH (2007) Current techniques in anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 23:938–947

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Zantop T, Wellmann M, Fu FH, Petersen W (2008) Tunnel positioning of anteromedial and posterolateral bundles in anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: anatomic and radiographic findings. Am J Sports Med 36:65–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Zbijewski W, De Jean P, Prakash P, Ding Y, Stayman JW, Packard N, Senn R, Yang D, Yorkston J, Machado A, Carrino JA, Siewerdsen JH (2011) A dedicated cone-beam CT system for musculoskeletal extremities imaging: design, optimization, and initial performance characterization. Med Phys 38:4700–4713

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Disclaimer

No author or related institution has received any financial benefit from research in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guilherme Moreira de Abreu-e-Silva.

Additional information

This study was carried out at Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Orthopaedic and Post-Graduation Surgery Department, Minas Gerais, Brazil, and at Hospital Felício Rocho, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abreu-e-Silva, G.M., Oliveira, M.H.G.C., Maranhão, G.S. et al. Three-dimensional computed tomography evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament footprint for anatomic single-bundle reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23, 770–776 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2703-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2703-9

Keywords

Navigation