Skip to main content
Log in

Arthroscopic treatment in mild to moderate osteoarthritis of the ankle

  • Ankle
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

This study was designed to review the outcomes of patients who have undergone arthroscopic treatment for mild to moderate ankle osteoarthritis and to determine the factors associated with unsuccessful outcomes.

Methods

A total of 63 patients (mean age, 53.7 ± 16 years) with mild to moderate ankle osteoarthritis who underwent arthroscopic treatment were analysed. We investigated the possible correlations between the clinicopathologic features and clinical outcomes using the visual analogue scale for pain and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot score and analysed the data to clarify the effect of prognostic factors on clinical outcome.

Results

Visual analogue scale and AOFAS scores were improved after surgery for up to 2 years (p < 0.0001). The largest improvements in clinical scores were observed after 6 months, and thereafter, they steadily declined. Body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.011) and presence of associated intra-articular lesions (p = 0.002) showed a significant correlation with the clinical outcome. There was no association between outcome and the patient’s age, gender, duration of symptoms, type of osteoarthritis, treatment modality and coronal alignment (n.s.).

Conclusion

Arthroscopic treatment for mild to moderate ankle osteoarthritis has a favourable outcome in selected patients. BMI and associated intra-articular lesion are significant risk factors for poor outcome.

Level of evidence

Retrospective case series, Level IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alford JW, Cole BJ (2005) Cartilage restoration, part 1: basic science, historical perspective, patient evaluation, and treatment options. Am J Sports Med 33:295–306

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Amendola A, Petrik J, Webster-Bogart S (1996) Ankle arthroscopy: outcome in 79 consecutive patients. Arthroscopy 12:563–573

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bird HA, Ring EF (1978) Therapeutic value of arthroscopy. Ann Rheum Dis 37:78–79

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Birmingham CL, Muller JL, Palepu A, Spinelli JJ, Anis AH (1999) The cost of obesity in Canada. CMAJ 160:483–488

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Buckwalter JA, Brown TD (2004) Joint injury, repair, and remodeling: roles in post-traumatic osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 423:7–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Buckwalter JA, Mankin HJ (1998) Articular cartilage: degeneration and osteoarthritis, repair, regeneration, and transplantation. Instr Course Lect 47:487–504

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Buckwalter JA, Mankin HJ, Grodzinsky AJ (2005) Articular cartilage and osteoarthritis. Instr Course Lect 54:465–480

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cheng JC, Ferkel RD (1998) The role of arthroscopy in ankle and subtalar degenerative joint disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res 349:65–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Choi WJ, Park KK, Kim BS, Lee JW (2009) Osteochondral lesion of the talus: is there a critical defect size for poor outcome? Am J Sport Med 37:1974–1980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Christensen R, Astrup A, Bliddal H (2005) Weight loss: the treatment of choice for knee osteoarthritis? A randomized trial. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 13:20–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cole AA, Kuettner KE (2002) Molecular basis for differences between human joints. Cell Mole Life Sci 59:19–26

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Conti SF, Wong YS (2001) Complications of total ankle replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 391:105–114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cox JS, Hewes TF (1979) “Normal” talar tilt angle. Clin Orthop Relat Res 140:37–41

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Feder KS, Schonholtz GJ (1992) Ankle arthroscopy: review and long term results. Foot Ankle 13:382–385

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Frey C, Zamora J (2007) The effects of obesity on orthopaedic foot and ankle pathology. Foot Ankle Int 28:996–999

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gougoulias N, Khanna A, Maffulli N (2010) How successful are current ankle replacements? A systematic review of the literature. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:199–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Guhl JF (1988) Traumatic and degenerative arthritis. Ankle arthroscopy: pathology and surgical techniques. Slack, Thorofare, pp 122–124

    Google Scholar 

  18. Harwin SF (1999) Arthroscopic debridement for osteoarthritis of the knee: predictors of patient satisfaction. J Arthrosc Relat Surg 15:142–146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hassouna H, Kumar S, Bendall S (2007) Arthroscopic ankle debridement: 5-year survival analysis. Acta Orthop Belg 73:737–740

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Huch K, Keuttner KE, Dieppe P (1997) Osteoarthritis in ankle and knee joints. Semin Arthritis Rheum 26:667–674

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS (1957) Radiological assessment of osteo-arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 16:494–502

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kirkley A, Birmingham TB, Litchfield RB, Giffin JR, Willits KR, Wong CJ, Feagan BG, Donner A, Griffin SH, D’Ascanio LM, Pope JE, Fowler PJ (2008) A randomized trial of arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee. N Engl J Med 359:1097–1107

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kitaoka HB, Alexander I, Adelaar RS, Nunley JA, Myerson MS, Sanders M (1994) Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int 15:349–353

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee JW, Suh JS, Huh YM, Moon ES, Kim SJ (2004) Soft tissue impingement syndrome of the ankle: diagnostic efficacy of MRI and clinical results after arthroscopic treatment. Foot Ankle Int 25:896–902

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Martin DF, Baker CL, Curl WW, Andrews JR, Robie DB, Haas AF (1989) Operative ankle arthroscopy. Long-term followup. Am J Sport Med 17:16–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. McLaren AC, Blokker CP, Fowler PJ, Roth JN, Rock MG (1991) Arthroscopic debridement of the knee for osteoarthritis. Can J Surg 34:595–598

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Mori R, Ochi M, Sakai Y, Adachi N, Uchio Y (1999) Clinical significance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for focal chondral lesions. Magn Reson Imaging 17:1135–1140

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Moseley JB, O’Malley K, Petersen NJ, Menke TJ, Brody BA, Kuykendall DH, Hollingsworth JC, Ashton CM, Wray NP (2002) A controlled trial of arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee. N Engl J Med 347:81–88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ogilvie-Harris DJ, Edward AS (1999) Arthroscopic treatment of osteochondritis dissecans of the talus arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 15:805–808

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ogilvie-Harris DJ, Edward AS (2000) Arthroscopic treatment of post-traumatic cysts of the talus arthroscopy. J Arthrosc Relat Surg 16:197–201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ogilvie-Harris DJ, Sekyi-Otu A (1995) Arthroscopic debridement for osteoarthritic ankle. Arthroscopy 11:433–436

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Saxena A, Eakin C (2007) Articular talar injuries in athletes: results of microfracture and autologous bone graft. Am J Sport Med 35:1680–1687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Shannon FJ, Devitt AT, Poynton AR, Fitzpatrick P, Walsh MG (2001) Short-term benefit of arthroscopic washout in degenerative arthritis of the knee. Int Orthop 25:242–245

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Spahn G, Mückley T, Kahl E, Hofmann G (2006) Factors affecting the outcome of arthroscopy in medial-compartment osteoarthritis of the knee. J Arthrosc Relat Surg 22:1233–1240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Spahn G, Wittig R (2002) Short-term effects of different arthroscopic techniques in treatment of chondral defects (shaving, coablation, and microfracturing). Eur J Trauma 6:349–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Takakura Y, Tanaka Y, Kumai T, Tamai S (1995) Low tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the ankle. Results of a new operation in 18 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77:50–54

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Valderrabano V, Hintermann B, Dick W (2004) Scandinavian total ankle replacement: a 3.7-year average followup of 65 patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 424:47–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Van Dijk CN (1997) A prospective study of prognostic factors concerning the outcome of arthroscopic surgery for anterior ankle impingement. Am J Sport Med 25:737–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zengerink M, Van Dijk CN (2012) Complications in ankle arthroscopy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:1420–1431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors did not receive any outside funding or grants in support of their research for or preparation of this work. Neither they nor a member of their immediate families received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jin Woo Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Choi, W.J., Choi, G.W., Kwon, Hm. et al. Arthroscopic treatment in mild to moderate osteoarthritis of the ankle. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21, 1338–1344 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-2216-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-2216-y

Keywords

Navigation