Skip to main content
Log in

A robust global optimization approach to solving CO problems – enhanced design space decrease collaborative optimization

  • RESEARCH PAPER
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Collaborative optimization (CO) is a decomposition-based multidisciplinary design optimization method that sometimes suffers from two predominant drawbacks: computational inefficiency and nonexistence of Lagrange multipliers when the system-level optimization solution is system-level feasible. To overcome aforementioned drawbacks, we propose enhanced design space decrease collaborative optimization (EDSDCO). It can notably simplify the system-level optimization problem through modifying the system-level consistency equality constraints that exist in the standard CO to create some linear inequality constraints with no tolerance. Thus, the aforementioned drawbacks, mainly resulted by the use of equality forms of consistency constraints, can be successfully overcome. During the process of optimization, the updated system-level solution space is constantly decreased; meanwhile, the original feasible region is entirely preserved throughout regardless of whether the constraints are convex. Consequently, the global optimum can be obtained when the system-level optimization solution moves into the original feasible region. In EDSDCO, the starting point is not introduced to the formulas of subsystem or system-level optimization. Therefore, the optimum obtained using EDSDCO cannot be affected by the parameters of the starting points, which certainly enhances EDSDCO’s robustness. EDSDCO converges faster than design space decrease collaborative optimization for two reasons: deleting more original infeasible region fragments per iteration and more efficient decision to choose the next solution subspace. In order to illustrate the proposed method’s capabilities, we describe the principles and process of EDSDCO and discuss its application to three optimization problems: a numerical test problem, gear reducer design problem, and combustion of propane problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexandrov NM, Lewis RM (1999) Comparative properties of collaborative optimization and other approaches to MDO. Technical Report ICASE Report. NASA/CR-1999-209354

  • Alexandrov NM, Lewis RM (2002) Analytical and computational aspects of collaborative optimization for multidisciplinary design. AIAA J 40(2):301–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun RD (1996) Collaborative optimization: an architecture for large-scale destributed design. Dissertation, Stanford University

  • Cormier T, Scott A, Ledsinger L et al. (2000) Comparison of collaborative optimization to conventional design techniques for a conceptual rlv. 8th AIAA/ USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Long Beach, California. AIAA–2000 –4885

  • Demiguel A, Murray W (2000) An analysis of collaborative optimization methods. 8th AIAA/USAF/ NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Long Beach, CA. AIAA– 2000– 4720

  • Gou P (2009) Application of sequential collaborative optimization in the structural system design of deep sea space station. Dissertation, Shanghai Jiao Tong University

  • Huque Z, Jahingir N (2002) Application of collaborative optimization on a RBCC inlet/ejector system. 38th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibi, Indianapolis, Indiana. AIAA 2002-3604

  • Jin X, Duan FH, Xin DZ, Mu G (2015) Novel multidisciplinary collaborative optimization method base on design space decrease. J Mech Eng 51(11):133–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroo I, Altus S, Braun R, Gage P, Sobieski I (1994) Multidisciplinary optimization methods for aircraft preliminary design. AIAA- 94-4325-cp: 697-707

  • Lee CH, Mavris ND (2012) Bayesian collaborative sampling for aero-propulsion design of an engine and nacelle. 48th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, Atlanta, Georgia. AIAA -2012-3997

  • Li X, Liu CA, Li WJ, Long T (2011) An alternative formulation of collaborative optimization base on geometric analysis. J Mech Des 133(5):051005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin JG (2004) Analysis and enhancement of collaborative optimization for multidisciplinary design. AIAA J 42(2):348–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padula SL, Alexandrov N, Green LL (1996) MDO Test suite at NASA Langley research center. AIAA Meeting Papers on Disc: 410-420

  • Park H, Chung J, Behdinan K et al. (2011) Reliability and possibility based multidisciplinary design optimization for aircraft conceptual design. 11th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) Conference, Virginia Beach, VA. AIAA 2011-6960

  • Roth BD, Kroo IM (2008) Enhanced collaborative optimization: a decomposition-based method for multidisciplinary design. Proceedings of the ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference Brooklyn, New York, USA. DETC2008-50038

  • Sobieski IP, Kroo IM (2000) Collaborative optimization using response surface estimation. AIAA J 38(10):1931–1938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tedford NP, Martins JRRA (2010) Benchmarking multidisciplinary design algorithms. Optim Eng (2010) 11:159–183

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xu L (2009) Research and application of aerospace vehicle MDO process and related technology. Dissertation, National University of Defense Technology

  • Yi SI, Shin JK, Park GJ (2008) Comparison of MDO methods with mathematical examples. Struct Multidiscip Optim 35(5):391–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang ZQ, He LS (2011) Multidisciplinary design collaborative optimization for common aero vehicle. J Beijing Univ Aeronaut Astronaut 37(4):478–482

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51275068) and Aeronautical Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 20130863006, 20150863003).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fuhai Duan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jin, X., Duan, F., Chen, P. et al. A robust global optimization approach to solving CO problems – enhanced design space decrease collaborative optimization. Struct Multidisc Optim 55, 2305–2322 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-016-1644-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-016-1644-6

Keywords

Navigation