Skip to main content
Log in

First order reliability method for time-variant problems using series expansions

  • RESEARCH PAPER
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Time-variant reliability is often evaluated by Rice’s formula combined with the First Order Reliability Method (FORM). To improve the accuracy and efficiency of the Rice/FORM method, this work develops a new simulation method with the first order approximation and series expansions. The approximation maps the general stochastic process of the response into a Gaussian process, whose samples are then generated by the Expansion Optimal Linear Estimation if the response is stationary or by the Orthogonal Series Expansion if the response is non-stationary. As the computational cost largely comes from estimating the covariance of the response at expansion points, a cheaper surrogate model of the covariance is built and allows for significant reduction in computational cost. In addition to its superior accuracy and efficiency over the Rice/FORM method, the proposed method can also produce the failure rate and probability of failure with respect to time for a given period of time within only one reliability analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrieu-Renaud C, Sudret B, Lemaire M (2004) The PHI2 method: a way to compute time-variant reliability. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 84(1):75–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergman LA, Shinozuka M, Bucher CG, Sobczyk K, Dasgupta G, Spanos PD, Deodatis G, Spencer BF, Ghanem RG, Sutoh A, Grigoriu M, Takada T, Hoshiya M, Wedig WV, Johnson EA, Wojtkiewicz SF, Naess A, Yoshida I, Pradlwarter HJ, Zeldin BA, Schuëller GI, Zhang R (1997) A state-of-the-art report on computational stochastic mechanicsk. Probabilistic Eng Mech 12(4):197–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard MC, Shipley JW (1972) The first passage problem for stationary random structural vibration. J Sound Vib 24(1):121–132

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Breitung K (1984) Asymptotic crossing rates for stationary Gaussian vector processes. Tech. Report, 1, Dept. of Math, and Statistics, Univ. of Lund, Lund, Sweden

  • Breitung K (1988) Asymptotic approximations for the outcrossing rates of stationary vector processes. Stochast Process Appl 13:195–207

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chen JB, Li J (2007) The extreme value distribution and dynamic reliability analysis of nonlinear structures with uncertain parameters. Struct Saf 29(2):77–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi SK, Grandhi RV, Canfield RA (2007) Reliability-based structural design. Springer, pp 1–7

  • Crato N, Ray BK (1996) Model selection and forecasting for long-range dependent processes. J Forecast 15(2):107–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg T (1988) The peak factor of a short sample of a stationary Gaussian process. J Sound Vib 122(1):1–10

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ditlevsen O (1983) Gaussian outcrossings from safe convex polyhedrons. J Eng Mech 109(1):127–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eldred MS (2009) Recent advances in non-intrusive polynomial chaos and stochastic collocation methods for uncertainty analysis and design. In: Proceedings of the 50th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference, art. no. 2009–2274

  • Eldred MS, Burkardt J (2009) Comparison of non-intrusive polynomial chaos and stochastic collocation methods for uncertainty quantification. In: Proceedings 47th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting including the new horizons forum and aerospace exposition, art. no. 2009–0976

  • Gebraeel N, Elwany A, Pan J (2009) Residual life predictions in the absence of prior degradation knowledge. IEEE Transactions on Reliab 58(1):106–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghanem RG, Spanos PD (1991) Stochastic finite element analysis: a spectral approach. Springer, New York, pp 67–99

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • González-Fernández RA, Leite Da Silva AM (2011) Reliability assessment of time-dependent systems via sequential cross-entropy Monte Carlo simulation. IEEE Trans Power Syst 26(4):2381–2389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grigoriu M (2003) A class of models for non-stationary Gaussian processes. Probabilistic Eng Mech 18(3):203–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grogan JA, Leen SB, McHugh PE (2013) Optimizing the design of a bioabsorbable metal stent using computer simulation methods. Biomaterials 34(33):8049–8060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gusev AA (1996) Peak factors of Mexican accelerograms: evidence of a non-Gaussian amplitude distribution. J Geophys Res B: Solid Earth 101(9):20083–20090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagen O, Tvedt L (1991) Vector process out-crossing as parallel system sensitivity measure. J Eng Mech 117(10):2201–2220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagen O, Tvedt L (1992) Parallel system approach for vector out-crossing. J Offshore Mech Arctic Eng 114(2):122–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu C, Youn BD, Wang P, Taek Yoon J (2012) Ensemble of data-driven prognostic algorithms for robust prediction of remaining useful life. Reliab Eng & Syst Saf 103:120–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu Z, Du X (2012) Reliability analysis for hydrokinetic turbine blades. Renew Energy 48:251–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu Z, Du X (2013) A sampling approach to extreme value distribution for time-dependent reliability analysis. J Mech Des 135(7):071003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu Z, Du X (2013) Time-dependent reliability analysis with joint upcrossing rates. Struct Multidiscip Optim 48(5):893–907

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hu Z, Du X (2013) Lifetime cost optimization with time-dependent reliability. Engineering optimization (ahead-of-print), pp 1–22

  • Hu Z, Li H, Du X, Chandrashekhara K (2013) Simulation-based time-dependent reliability analysis for composite hydrokinetic turbine blades. Struct Multidiscip Optim 47(5):765–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itoh Y (2007) A class of Gaussian hybrid processes for modeling financial markets. Asia-Pacific Finan Markets 14(3):185–199

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Mourelatos Z, Singh A (2012) Optimal preventive maintenance schedule based on lifecycle cost and time-dependent reliability. SAE Int J Mater Manuf 5(1):87–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindgren G (1984) Extremal ranks and transformation of variables or extremes of functions of multivariate Gaussian processes. Stoch Process Appl 17:285–312

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood B, Mavriplis D (2013) Gradient-based methods for uncertainty quantification in hypersonic flows. Comput Fluids 85:27–38

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lophaven SN, Nielsen HB, Søndergaard J (2002) DACE-A MATLAB Kriging toolbox. Technical University of Denmark

  • Lovric M (2011) International encyclopedia of statistical science. Springer, pp 496–497

  • Madsen PH, Krenk S (1984) Integral equation method for the first-passage problem in random vibration. J Appl Mech Trans ASME 51(3):674–679

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mori Y, Ellingwood BR (1993) Time-dependent system reliability analysis by adaptive importance sampling. Struct Saf 12(1):59–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newbold P, Agiakloglou C, Miller J (1994) Adventures with ARIMA software. Int J Forecast 10(4):573–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preumont A (1985) On the peak factor of stationary Gaussian processes. J Sound Vib 100(1):15–34

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Press WH (2007) Numerical recipes 3rd edition: the art of scientific computing. Cambridge university press

  • Raghavan B, Breitkopf P (2013) Asynchronous evolutionary shape optimization based on high-quality surrogates: application to an air-conditioning duct. Eng Comput 29(4):467–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman S, Xu H (2005) A meshless method for computational stochastic mechanics. Int J Comput Methods Eng Sci Mech 6:41–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice SO (1944) Mathematical analysis of random noise. Bell Syst Techn J 23:282–332

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rice SO (1945) Mathematical analysis of random noise. Bell Syst Tech J 24:146–156

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Richard B, Cremona C, Adelaide L (2012) A response surface method based on support vector machines trained with an adaptive experimental design. Struct Saf 39:14–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh A, Mourelatos ZP, Li J (2010) Design for lifecycle cost using time-dependent reliability. J Mech Des Trans ASME 132(9):0910081–09100811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh A, Mourelatos ZP, Nikolaidis E (2011) An importance sampling approach for time-dependent reliability. In: Proceedings of the ASME design engineering technical conference, Washington, DC, I.C. pp 1077–1088

  • Singh A, Mourelatos Z, Nikolaidis E (2011) Time-dependent reliability of random dynamic systems using time-series modeling and importance sampling. SAE Int J Mater Manuf 4(1):929–946

    Google Scholar 

  • Steponaviče I, Ruuska S, Miettinen K (2014) A solution process for simulation-based multiobjective design optimization with an application in the paper industry. CAD Comput Aided Des 47:45–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sudret B (2008) Global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansions. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 93(7):964–979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sudret B, Der Kiureghian A (2002) Comparison of finite element reliability methods. Probabilistic Eng Mech 17(4):337–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sudret B, Kiureghian AD (2000) Stochastic finite element methods and reliability: a state-of-the-art report. A report on research supported by Electricité de France under Award Number D56395-T6L29-RNE861, Report No. UCB/SEMM-2000/08. University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanmarcke EH (1975) On the distribution of the first-passage time for normal stationary random processes. J Appl Mech 42:215–220

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wan J, Zudilin W (2013) Generating functions of Legendre polynomials: a tribute to Fred Brafman. J Approx Theory:198–213

  • Wang Z, Wang P (2012) Reliability-based product design with time-dependent performance deterioration. In: Proceedings 2012 IEEE international conference on prognostics and health management: enhancing safety, efficiency, availability, and effectiveness of systems through PHM technology and application, PHM 2012, Denver, CO, 18-21 June, 2012, pp 1–12. doi:10.1109/ICPHM.2012.6299541

  • Wang Z, Wang P (2012) Reliability-based product design with time-dependent performance deterioration. In: Proceedings 2012 IEEE international conference on prognostics and health management: enhancing safety, efficiency, availability, and effectiveness of systems through PHM technology and application, PHM 2012, Denver, CO

  • Wang GG, Dong Z, Aitchison P (2001) Adaptive response surface method - A global optimization scheme for approximation-based design problems. Eng Optim 33(6):707–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Mourelatos ZP, Li J, Singh A, Baseski I (2013) Time-dependent reliability of dynamic systems using subset simulation with splitting over a series of correlated time intervals. In: Proceedings ASME 2013 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, American society of mechanical engineers, pp V03BT03A048-V003BT003A048

  • Yang JN, Shinozuka M (1971) On the first excursion probability in stationary narrow- band random vibration. J Appl Mech Trans ASME 38 Ser E (4):1017–1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youn BD, Hu C, Wang P (2011) Resilience-driven system design of complex engineered systems. J Mech Des 133:10101011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • žilinskas A (1992) A review of statistical models for global optimization. J Global Optim 2(2):145–153

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Ellingwood B (1994) Orthogonal series expansions of random fields in reliability analysis. J Eng Mech 120(12):2660–2677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Du X (2011) Time-dependent reliability analysis for function generator mechanisms. ASME J Mech Des 133(3):031005.

  • Zhang HQ, Gao LB (2012) Application of legendre polynomial in predicting of energy consumption per capital. In: World automation congress (WAC), pp 1–3

Download references

Acknowledgments

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation through grant CMMI 1234855. We would also like to acknowledge the support from the Intelligent Systems Center at the Missouri University of Science and Technology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoping Du.

Appendices

Appendix A: Expansion optimal linear estimation (EOLE)

EOLE (Sudret and Der Kiureghian 2002) is used to generate samples for a Gaussian stochastic process Y(t) on [0, T], which is divided into sintervals with a step size \({\Delta } t=\frac {T}{s}\). The s time instants are t i =(i−1)Δt, where i=1, 2, ⋯, s. The covariance matrix Σ is given by

$$ {\mathbf{\Sigma }}=\left( {{\begin{array}{*{20}c} {c_{Y} \left( {t_{1} ,\;t_{1} } \right)} \hfill & {c_{Y} \left( {t_{1} ,\;t_{2} } \right)} \hfill & {\cdots} \hfill & {c_{Y} \left( {t_{1} ,\;t_{s} } \right)} \hfill \\ {c_{Y} \left( {t_{2} ,\;t_{1} } \right)} \hfill & {c_{Y} \left( {t_{2} ,\;t_{2} } \right)} \hfill & {\cdots} \hfill & {c_{Y} \left( {t_{2} ,\;t_{s} } \right)} \hfill \\ {\vdots} \hfill & {\vdots} \hfill & {\ddots} \hfill & {\vdots} \hfill \\ {c_{Y} \left( {t_{s} ,\;t_{1} } \right)} \hfill & {c_{Y} \left( {t_{s} ,\;t_{2} } \right)} \hfill & {\cdots} \hfill & {c_{Y} \left( {t_{s} ,\;t_{s} } \right)} \hfill \\ \end{array} }} \right)_{s\times s} $$
(A1)

where c Y (t i , t j ) is the covariance of Y(t) at t i and t j .

Let the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of Σ be η i and φ i , i=1, 2, ⋯, s, respectively. Then Y(t) is approximated by the following series expansion (Sudret and Der Kiureghian 2002):

$$ Y\left( t \right)\approx \mu_{Y} (t)+\sigma_{Y} (t)\sum\limits_{i=1}^{p} {\frac{Z_{i} }{\sqrt {\eta_{i} } }{\mathbf{\varphi }}_{i}^{T} } {\boldsymbol\rho }_{Y} (t) $$
(A2)

in which Z i (i=1, 2,⋯,ps) are independent standard Gaussian random variables, ρ Y (t)=[ρ Y (t, t 1),ρ Y (t, t 2),…,ρ Y (t, t p )]T, and μ Y (t) and σ Y (t) are the mean and standard deviation of Y(t), respectively; p is the number of terms, and ps. When p=s, no truncation is made, and the error is minimum.

The accuracy of EOLE is affected by the size of the finite element mesh Δt, and the selection of the size depends on the correlation length of the stochastic process (Sudret and Der Kiureghian 2002). The shorter is the mesh length, the more accurate are the results.

Appendix B: Orthogonal series expansion (OSE)

Different from EOLE, OSE does not need finite element meshes. Its accuracy is therefore not affected by the mesh size. OSE approximates a Gaussian process Y(t) as Zhang and Ellingwood (1994)

$$ Y(t)=\mu (t)+\sum\limits_{i=1}^{M} {\gamma_{i} } h_{i} (t) $$
(B1)

in which Γ=[γ 1,γ 2,…,γ M ] is a vector of correlated zero-mean Gaussian random variables, and h i (t), i=1, 2, ⋯, M, are orthogonal functions.

The correlated random variables γ i are then transformed into independent standard Gaussian random variables with the following steps.

Construct an M×M square matrix Γ by

$$ ({\boldsymbol{\Gamma }})_{ij} ={{\int}_{0}^{T}} {{{\int}_{0}^{T}} {C_{YY} (t,\;\tau )h_{i} (t)h_{j} (\tau )dtd\tau } } $$
(B2)

where C Y Y (t, τ) is the ato-covariance of Y(t).

Then obtain the eigenvectors of Γ. Use

$$ {\boldsymbol{\Gamma }}={\mathbf{P\uplambda P}}^{-1}={\mathbf{\Lambda {\Lambda} }}^{T} $$
(B3)

where λ is a diagonal matrix with its diagonal elements being eigenvalues of Γ, P is a M×M square matrix whose i-th column is the i-th eigenvector of Γ, and Λ is a lower triangular matrix.

Then Γ=[γ 1,γ 2,…,γ M ] is transformed into independent standard Gaussian random variables Z=[Z 1,Z 2,…,Z M ] through

$$ {\boldsymbol{\Gamma }}={\mathbf{\Lambda Z}} $$
(B4)

For the orthogonal functions,

$$ \int h_{i} (t)h_{j} (t)dt=\left\{ {\begin{array}{l} 1,\;\text{if}\;i=j \\ 0,\;\text{otherwise} \\ \end{array}} \right. $$
(B5)

The Legendre polynomials may be chosen as the orthogonal functions. When the eigenfunctions and covariance functions are approximated using the same orthogonal functions, OSE can be regarded as an approximation to the KL expansion (Zhang and Ellingwood 1994).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hu, Z., Du, X. First order reliability method for time-variant problems using series expansions. Struct Multidisc Optim 51, 1–21 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-014-1132-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-014-1132-9

Keywords

Navigation