Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Automatic design of marine structures by using successive response surface method

  • INDUSTRIAL APPLICATION
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An automated optimization procedure based on successive response surface method is presented. The method is applied to weight optimization of a stiffened plate used in marine structures. In the design space the surrogate model is spanned sequentially into an optimally restricted subspace that is converging towards at least a local optimum. Both objective function and all constraint functions are modeled using linear response surface method enabling the use of a robust and efficient simplex algorithm for the optimizations. Special attention is paid to CAD and FEM-model linking that plays a central role in practical industrial applications. In this project SOLIDWORKS and ANSYS software are adopted for structural modeling and analysis, respectively, and the optimization is carried out in a MatLab environment. The reported results achieved in this project prove the robustness and effectiveness of the proposed approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abu-Odeh A-Y, Jones H-L (1998) Optimum design of composite plates using response surface method. Compos Struct 43:233–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acar E, Guler MA, Gerceker B, Cerit ME, Bayram B (2011) Multi-objective crashworthiness optimization of tapered thin-walled tubes with axisymmetric indentations. Thin-Walled Struct 49:94–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arai M, Shimizu T (2001) Optimization of the design of ship structures using response surface methodology. In: Wu Y-S, Cui W-C, Zhou G-J (eds) Practical design of ships and other floating structures. pp 331–339

  • Eldred MS, Dunlavy DM (2006) Formulations for surrogate-based optimization with data fit, multifidelity, and reduced-order models. In: Proceedings of the 11th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, paper AIAA-2006-7117. Portsmouth, VA, 6-8 Sept

  • Gupta KC, Li J (2000) Robust design optimization with mathematical programming neural networks. Comput Struct 76:507–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinonen O, Pajunen S (2011) Optimal design of stiffened plate using metamodeling techniques. J Struct Mech 44(3):218–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Hock W, Schittkowski K (1981). Test examples for nonlinear programming codes. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, 187. Springer

  • Huang Z, Wang C, Chen J, Tian H (2011) Optimal design of aeroengine turbine disc based on kriging surrogate models. Comput Struct 89:27–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IACS (2009) Common Structural Rules for Bulk Carriers

  • Khuri AI, Cornell JA (1987) Response surfaces: design and analyses. Marcel Dekker Inc

  • Kleijnen JPC (2008) Response surface methodology for constrained simulation optimization: an overview. Simul Model Pract Theory 16:50–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery DC (2001) Design and analysis of experiments. Wiley

  • Nemhauser GL, Laurence AW (1988) Integer and Combinatorial Optimization. Wiley

  • Park H-S, Dang X-P (2010) Structural optimization based on CAD-CAE integration and metamodeling techniques. Comput Aided Des 42:889–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Queipo KN, Haftka RT, Shyy W, Goel T, Vaidyanathan R, Tucker PK (2005) Surrogate-based analysis and optimization. Prog Aerosp Sci 41:1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren W-X, Chen H-B (2010) Finite element model updating in structural dynamics by using response surface method. Eng Struct 32:2455–2465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roux WJ, Stander N, Haftka RT (1998) Response surface approximations for structural optimization. Int J Numer Methods Eng 42:517–534

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sakata S, Ashida F, Zako M (2003) Structural optimization using Kriging approximation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 192:923–939

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson TW, Mauery TM, Korte JJ, Mistree F (2001) Kriging models for global approximation in simulation-based multidisciplinary design optimization. AIAA J 39(12):2233–2241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stander N, Craig KJ (2002) On the robustness of a simple domain reduction scheme for simulation-based optimization. Eng Comput 19(4):431–450

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo K-S, Eom Y-S, Park J-Y, Im M-G, Han S-Y (2011) Reliability-based topology optimization using successive standard response surface method. Finite Elem Anal Des 47:843–849

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Support from the Finnish Metals and Engineering Competence Cluster (FIMECC) Innovations & Network- research and the research project Computational methods in mechanical engineering product development - SIMPRO are gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sami Pajunen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pajunen, S., Heinonen, O. Automatic design of marine structures by using successive response surface method. Struct Multidisc Optim 49, 863–871 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-013-1013-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-013-1013-7

Keywords

Navigation