Abstract
This paper describes a design methodology for piezoelectric energy harvesters that thinly encapsulate the mechanical devices and exploit resonances from higher-order vibrational modes. The direction of polarization determines the sign of the piezoelectric tensor to avoid cancellations of electric fields from opposite polarizations in the same circuit. The resultant modified equations of state are solved by finite element method (FEM). Combining this method with the solid isotropic material with penalization (SIMP) method for piezoelectric material, we have developed an optimization methodology that optimizes the piezoelectric material layout and polarization direction. Updating the density function of the SIMP method is performed based on sensitivity analysis, the sequential linear programming on the early stage of the optimization, and the phase field method on the latter stage of the optimization to obtain clear optimal shapes without intermediate density. Numerical examples are provided that illustrate the validity and utility of the proposed method.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allaire G (2001) Shape optimization by the homogenization method. Springer, New York
Allaire G (2007) Conception optimale de structures. Springer, Berlin
Allaire G, Jouve F, Toader AM (2004) Structural optimization using sensitivity analysis and a level-set method. J Comput Phys 194(1): 363–393
Anton SR, Sodano HA (2007) A review of power harvesting using piezoelectric materials (2003–2006). Smart Mater Struct 16:R1
Beeby SP, Tudor MJ, White NM (2006) Energy harvesting vibration sources for microsystems applications. Meas Sci Technol 17:R175
Belytschko T, Liu WK, Moran B (2000) Nonlinear finite elements for continua and structures. Wiley, Chichester
Bendsøe MP (1989) Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem. Struct Optim 1(4):193–202
Bendsøe MP, Kikuchi N (1988) Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 71(2):197–224
Bendsøe MP, Sigmund O (1999) Material interpolation schemes in topology optimization. Arch Appl Mech 69(9):635–654
Bendsøe MP, Sigmund O (2003) Topology optimization: theory, methods, and applications. Springer, Berlin
Berlincourt DA, Curran DR, Jaffe H (1964) Piezoelectric and piezomagnetic materials and their function in transducers. In: Mason WP (ed) Physical acoustics, principle and methods, vol 1, Part A. Academic, New York, pp 169–270
Bourisli RI, Al-Ajmi MA (2010) Optimization of smart beams for maximum modal electromechanical coupling using genetic algorithms. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 21(9):907–914
Bruns TE, Sigmund O, Tortorelli DA (2002) Numerical methods for the topology optimization of structures that exhibit snap-through. Int J Numer Meth Eng 55(10):1215–1237
Chen S, Gonella S, Chen W, Liu WK (2010) A level set approach for optimal design of smart energy harvesters. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 199(37–40):2532–2543
Cook-Chennault KA, Thambi N, Sastry AM (2008) Powering mems portable devices—a review of non-regenerative and regenerative power supply systems with special emphasis on piezoelectric energy harvesting systems. Smart Mater Struct 17:043001
duToit NE, Wardle BL, Kim SG (2005) Design considerations for mems-scale piezoelectric mechanical vibration energy harvesters. Integr Ferroelectr 71:121–160
Erturk A, Inman DJ (2008a) A distributed parameter electromechanical model for cantilevered piezoelectric energy harvesters. J Vib Acoust 130:041002
Erturk A, Inman DJ (2008b) On mechanical modeling of cantilevered piezoelectric vibration energy harvesters. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 19(11):1311–1325
Erturk A, Tarazaga PA, Farmer JR, Inman DJ (2009) Effect of strain nodes and electrode configuration on piezoelectric energy harvesting from cantilevered beams. J Vib Acoust 131:011010
Gonella S, To AC, Liu WK (2009) Interplay between phononic bandgaps and piezoelectric microstructures for energy harvesting. J Mech Phys Solid 57(3):621–633
Kim JE, Kim DS, Ma PS, Kim YY (2010) Multi-physics interpolation for the topology optimization of piezoelectric systems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199(49–52):3153–3168
Kim S, Clark WW, Wang QM (2005a) Piezoelectric energy harvesting with a clamped circular plate: analysis. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 16(10):847–854
Kim S, Clark WW, Wang QM (2005b) Piezoelectric energy harvesting with a clamped circular plate: experimental study. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 16(10):855–863
Kögl M, Silva ECN (2005) Topology optimization of smart structures: design of piezoelectric plate and shell actuators. Smart Mater Struct 14:387–399
Landau LD, Pitaevskii LP, Lifshitz EM (1984) Electrodynamics of continuous media, 2nd edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford
Lee C, Xie J (2009) Design and optimization of wafer bonding packaged microelectromechanical systems thermoelectric power generators with heat dissipation path. J Vac Sci Technol B 27:1267–1271
Lee S, Youn BD (2011) A new piezoelectric energy harvesting design concept: multimodal energy harvesting skin. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 58(3):629–645
Lee S, Youn BD, Jung BC (2009) Robust segment-type energy harvester and its application to a wireless sensor. Smart Mater Struct 18:095021
Makihara K, Onoda J, Miyakawa T (2006) Low energy dissipation electric circuit for energy harvesting. Smart Mater Struct 15:1493
Nakasone PH, Silva ECN (2010) Dynamic design of piezoelectric laminated sensors and actuators using topology optimization. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 21(16):1627–1652
Priya S (2007) Advances in energy harvesting using low profile piezoelectric transducers. J Electroceram 19(1):167–184
Roundy S, Wright PK, Rabaey J (2003) A study of low level vibrations as a power source for wireless sensor nodes. Comput Comm 26(11):1131–1144
Rupp CJ, Evgrafov A, Maute K, Dunn ML (2009) Design of piezoelectric energy harvesting systems: a topology optimization approach based on multilayer plates and shells. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 20(16):1923–1939
Sodano HA, Inman DJ, Park G (2004) A review of power harvesting from vibration using piezoelectric materials. Shock Vib Dig 36(3):197–206
Sun KH, Kim YY (2010) Layout design optimization for magneto-electro-elastic laminate composites for maximized energy conversion under mechanical loading. Smart Mater Struct 19:055008
Tadesse Y, Zhang S, Priya S (2009) Multimodal energy harvesting system: piezoelectric and electromagnetic. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 20(5):625–623
Takezawa A, Nishiwaki S, Kitamura M (2010) Shape and topology optimization based on the phasefield method and sensitivity analysis. J Comput Phys 229(7):2697–2718
Wang MY, Wang X, Guo D (2003) A level set method for structural topology optimization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 192(1–2):227–246
Warren JA, Kobayashi R, Lobkovsky AE, Craig Carter W (2003) Extending phase field models of solidification to polycrystalline materials. Acta Mater 51(20):6035–6058
Zheng B, Chang CJ, Gea HC (2009) Topology optimization of energy harvesting devices using piezoelectric materials. Struct Multidiscip Optim 38(1):17–23
Zhou M, Rozvany GIN (1991) The coc algorithm. II: topological, geometrical and generalized shape optimization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 89(1–3):309–336
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 25820422 and 25630436.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Appendix In this appendix, the detailed derivation of the sensitivity in (30) and the adjoint equations in (32)–(35) is outlined. The derivatives of the objective functions with respect to the density function are based on the procedure shown in Chapter 5 of Allaire (2007). The general objective function of piezoelectric problem is defined as \(J(\phi ) = \int j(\boldsymbol {u},V) dx\). The derivative of this function in the direction \(\theta \) is then
where \(\boldsymbol {v}=\langle \boldsymbol {u}'(\phi ),\theta \rangle ,\ w = \langle V'(\phi ),\theta \rangle \). Setting adjoint states \(\boldsymbol {p}\) and q as test functions of the weak-form equations of state in (11)–(18), the Lagrangian is formulated as follows:
Using this, the derivative of the objective function can be expressed as
Consider the case where the second and third terms are zero. These terms are calculated as follows:
When the adjoint states \(\boldsymbol {p}\) and q satisfy the above adjoint equations, the second and third terms of (59) can be ignored. On the other hand, the derivatives of (11)–(18) with respect to \(\phi \) in the direction \(\theta \) are
where
Substituting (62) and (63) into (60) and (61) and combining them into one equation, the following equation is obtained:
Substituting (68) into (57) yields following equation:
Next, the adjoint equations are calculated from (60) and (61). When the electric energy \(c(V,V)\) is considered as the objective function, it is formulated as follows:
Thus,
Substituting (71) and (72) into (60) and (61) respectively gives following equation
When the strain energy \(a(\boldsymbol {u},\boldsymbol {u})\) is considered as the objective function, it is formulated as follows:
Thus,
Substituting (76) and (77) into (60) and (61) respectively gives following equation
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Takezawa, A., Kitamura, M., Vatanabe, S. et al. Design methodology of piezoelectric energy-harvesting skin using topology optimization. Struct Multidisc Optim 49, 281–297 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-013-0974-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-013-0974-x