Skip to main content
Log in

Simultaneous shape and topology optimization of shell structures

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this research, Method of Moving Asymptotes (MMA) is utilized for simultaneous shape and topology optimization of shell structures. It is shown that this approach is well matched with the large number of topology and shape design variables. The currently practiced technology for optimization is to find the topology first and then to refine the shape of structure. In this paper, the design parameters of shape and topology are optimized simultaneously in one go. In order to model and control the shape of free form shells, the NURBS (Non Uniform Rational B-Spline) technology is used. The optimization problem is considered as the minimization of mean compliance with the total material volume as active constraint and taking the shape and topology parameters as design variables. The material model employed for topology optimization is assumed to be the Solid Isotropic Material with Penalization (SIMP). Since the MMA optimization method requires derivatives of the objective function and the volume constraint with respect to the design variables, a sensitivity analysis is performed. Also, for alleviation of the instabilities such as mesh dependency and checkerboarding the convolution noise cleaning technique is employed. Finally, few examples taken from literature are presented to demonstrate the performance of the method and to study the effect of the proposed concurrent approach on the optimal design in comparison to the sequential topology and shape optimization methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ansola R, Canales J, Tarrago JA, Rasmussen J (2002) An integrated approach for shape and topology optimization of shell structures. Comput Struct 18:449–458

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansola R, Canales J, Tarrago JA, Rasmussen J (2004) Combined shape and rainforcement layout optimization of shell structures. Struct Multidisc Optim 27:219–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendsoe MP (1989) Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem. Struct Optim 1:193–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendsoe MP, Kikuchi N (1988) Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 71:197–224

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bendsoe MP, Sigmund O (2003) Topology optimization: theory, methods and application. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Bletzinger KU, Ramm E (1993) Form finding of shells by structural optimization. Eng Comput 9:27–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bletzinger KU, Matthias F, Fernass D (2008) Approximation of derivatives in semi-analytical structural optimization. Comput Struct 86:1404–1414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Boer H, van Keulen F (2000) Refined semi-analytical design sensitivities. Int J Solids Struct 37:6961–6980

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz AR, Sigmond O (1995) Checkerboard paterns in layout optimization. Struct Optimn 10:40–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding Y (1986) Shape optimization of structures: a literature survey. Comput Struct 24:985–1004

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Haftka RT, Grandhi RV (1982) Structural shape optimization—a survey. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 30:263–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassani B, Hinton E (1998a) A review of homogenization and topology optimization—part I: homogenization theory for media with periodic structure. Comput Struct 69(6):707–717

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hassani B, Hinton E (1998b) A review of homogenization and topology optimization—part II: analytical and numerical solutions of homogenization equations. Comput Struct 69(6):719–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassani B, Hinton E (1998c) A review of homogenization and topology optimization—part III: topology optimization using optimality criteria. Comput Struct 69(6):740–756

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassani B, Hinton E (1998d) Homogenization and structural topology optimization: theory, practice and software. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassani B, Moghaddam NZ (2009) Using NURBS for surface and 712 structured mesh generation of complicated free from shells. Technical Report No. 1007, Shahrood University of Technology, Iran (In Farsi)

  • Hassani B, Tavakkoli SM (2005) Derivation of incompatible modes in non-conforming finite elements using hierarchical shape functions. Asian J Struct Eng 6(3):41–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinton E, Rao NVR, Sienz J (1992) Finite element structural shape and thickness optimisation of axisymmetric shells. Eng Comput 9:499–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinton E, Özakça M, Sienz J (1993) Optimum shapes of vibrating axisymmetric plates and shells. J Sound Vib 167:511–528

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Krog L, Olhoff N (1996) Optimum topology and reinforcement design of disk and plate structures with multiple stiffness and eigenfrequency objectives. Comput Struct 72:535–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maute K, Ramm E (1997) Adaptive topology optimization of shell structures. AIAA J 35:1767–1773

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Olhoff N, Rozvany G (1995) Structural and multidisciplinary optimization. Pergamon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Piegl L, Tiller W (1997) The NURBS book, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy JN (1986) Applied functional analysis and variational methods in engineering. McGraw-Hill, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy JN, Rasmussen ML (1982) Advanced engineering analysis. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigmund O (1994) Design of material structures using topology optimization. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Solid Mechanics, Technical University of Denmark

  • Sigmund O (1998) Numerical instabilities in topology optimization: a survey of procedure dealing with checkerboards, mesh-dependencies and local minima. Struct Optim 16:68–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki K, Kikuchi N (1991) Generalized layout optimization of three dimensional shell structures. In: Komkov V (ed) Geometric aspects of industrial design. SIAM, Philadelphia, 62–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Svanberg K (1987) The method of moving asymptotes—a new method for structural optimization. Int J Numer Methods Eng 24:359–373

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Van Keulen F, Haftka R, Kim N (2005) Review of options for structural design sensitivity analysis, part 1: linear systems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 194:3213–3243

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EL (1998) Three dimensional static and dynamic analysis of structures: a physical approach with emphasis on earthquake engineering. Computers & Structures, Inc, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank Professor Krister Svanberg for providing the MMA code.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Behrooz Hassani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hassani, B., Tavakkoli, S.M. & Ghasemnejad, H. Simultaneous shape and topology optimization of shell structures. Struct Multidisc Optim 48, 221–233 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-013-0894-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-013-0894-9

Keywords

Navigation