Abstract
In this research, Method of Moving Asymptotes (MMA) is utilized for simultaneous shape and topology optimization of shell structures. It is shown that this approach is well matched with the large number of topology and shape design variables. The currently practiced technology for optimization is to find the topology first and then to refine the shape of structure. In this paper, the design parameters of shape and topology are optimized simultaneously in one go. In order to model and control the shape of free form shells, the NURBS (Non Uniform Rational B-Spline) technology is used. The optimization problem is considered as the minimization of mean compliance with the total material volume as active constraint and taking the shape and topology parameters as design variables. The material model employed for topology optimization is assumed to be the Solid Isotropic Material with Penalization (SIMP). Since the MMA optimization method requires derivatives of the objective function and the volume constraint with respect to the design variables, a sensitivity analysis is performed. Also, for alleviation of the instabilities such as mesh dependency and checkerboarding the convolution noise cleaning technique is employed. Finally, few examples taken from literature are presented to demonstrate the performance of the method and to study the effect of the proposed concurrent approach on the optimal design in comparison to the sequential topology and shape optimization methods.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ansola R, Canales J, Tarrago JA, Rasmussen J (2002) An integrated approach for shape and topology optimization of shell structures. Comput Struct 18:449–458
Ansola R, Canales J, Tarrago JA, Rasmussen J (2004) Combined shape and rainforcement layout optimization of shell structures. Struct Multidisc Optim 27:219–227
Bendsoe MP (1989) Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem. Struct Optim 1:193–202
Bendsoe MP, Kikuchi N (1988) Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 71:197–224
Bendsoe MP, Sigmund O (2003) Topology optimization: theory, methods and application. Springer, Berlin
Bletzinger KU, Ramm E (1993) Form finding of shells by structural optimization. Eng Comput 9:27–35
Bletzinger KU, Matthias F, Fernass D (2008) Approximation of derivatives in semi-analytical structural optimization. Comput Struct 86:1404–1414
De Boer H, van Keulen F (2000) Refined semi-analytical design sensitivities. Int J Solids Struct 37:6961–6980
Diaz AR, Sigmond O (1995) Checkerboard paterns in layout optimization. Struct Optimn 10:40–45
Ding Y (1986) Shape optimization of structures: a literature survey. Comput Struct 24:985–1004
Haftka RT, Grandhi RV (1982) Structural shape optimization—a survey. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 30:263–84
Hassani B, Hinton E (1998a) A review of homogenization and topology optimization—part I: homogenization theory for media with periodic structure. Comput Struct 69(6):707–717
Hassani B, Hinton E (1998b) A review of homogenization and topology optimization—part II: analytical and numerical solutions of homogenization equations. Comput Struct 69(6):719–738
Hassani B, Hinton E (1998c) A review of homogenization and topology optimization—part III: topology optimization using optimality criteria. Comput Struct 69(6):740–756
Hassani B, Hinton E (1998d) Homogenization and structural topology optimization: theory, practice and software. Springer, London
Hassani B, Moghaddam NZ (2009) Using NURBS for surface and 712 structured mesh generation of complicated free from shells. Technical Report No. 1007, Shahrood University of Technology, Iran (In Farsi)
Hassani B, Tavakkoli SM (2005) Derivation of incompatible modes in non-conforming finite elements using hierarchical shape functions. Asian J Struct Eng 6(3):41–53
Hinton E, Rao NVR, Sienz J (1992) Finite element structural shape and thickness optimisation of axisymmetric shells. Eng Comput 9:499–527
Hinton E, Özakça M, Sienz J (1993) Optimum shapes of vibrating axisymmetric plates and shells. J Sound Vib 167:511–528
Krog L, Olhoff N (1996) Optimum topology and reinforcement design of disk and plate structures with multiple stiffness and eigenfrequency objectives. Comput Struct 72:535–563
Maute K, Ramm E (1997) Adaptive topology optimization of shell structures. AIAA J 35:1767–1773
Olhoff N, Rozvany G (1995) Structural and multidisciplinary optimization. Pergamon Press, Oxford
Piegl L, Tiller W (1997) The NURBS book, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin
Reddy JN (1986) Applied functional analysis and variational methods in engineering. McGraw-Hill, New York
Reddy JN, Rasmussen ML (1982) Advanced engineering analysis. Wiley, New York
Sigmund O (1994) Design of material structures using topology optimization. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Solid Mechanics, Technical University of Denmark
Sigmund O (1998) Numerical instabilities in topology optimization: a survey of procedure dealing with checkerboards, mesh-dependencies and local minima. Struct Optim 16:68–75
Suzuki K, Kikuchi N (1991) Generalized layout optimization of three dimensional shell structures. In: Komkov V (ed) Geometric aspects of industrial design. SIAM, Philadelphia, 62–88
Svanberg K (1987) The method of moving asymptotes—a new method for structural optimization. Int J Numer Methods Eng 24:359–373
Van Keulen F, Haftka R, Kim N (2005) Review of options for structural design sensitivity analysis, part 1: linear systems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 194:3213–3243
Wilson EL (1998) Three dimensional static and dynamic analysis of structures: a physical approach with emphasis on earthquake engineering. Computers & Structures, Inc, Berkeley
Acknowledgement
The authors would like to thank Professor Krister Svanberg for providing the MMA code.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hassani, B., Tavakkoli, S.M. & Ghasemnejad, H. Simultaneous shape and topology optimization of shell structures. Struct Multidisc Optim 48, 221–233 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-013-0894-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-013-0894-9