Abstract
The anti-optimization problem of structures with uncertain design variables is studied by combing the conventional optimization and interval analysis. The uncertain design parameters, which usually exist in the object function and constraint conditions, are modeled as interval sets. The proposed method can endure the variation of structural performance resulting from the variation of uncertain design parameters. According to the variation range of them, the range or interval of the optimal objective function and the optimal solution can be determined. In this sense, the optimal solution is one domain rather than a point. Numerical examples are used to illustrate the feasibility and superiority of the non-probabilistic optimization method in comparison with the conventional and probabilistic optimization methods.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Elishakoff I, Ben-Haim Y (1990) Probabilistic and convex models of uncertainty in structural dynamics. In: Proceedings of the eighth international modal analysis conference, Orlando, pp 1487–1492
Elishakoff I, Cai GQ, Starnes JH Jr (1994a) Probabilistic and convex models of uncertainty in buckling of structures. In: Schucller GI, Shinozuka M, Yao J (eds) Proceedings of the sixth international conference on structural safety and reliability, vol 2. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 761–766
Elishakoff I, Haftka RT, Fang J (1994b) Structure design under bounded uncertainty-optimization with anti-optimization. Comput Struct 53(6):1401–1405
Elishakoff I, Haftka RT, Fang JJ (1995) Structural design under bounded uncertainty optimization with antioptimization. Comput Struct 53:1401–1405
Ganzerli S, Pantelides CP (2000) Optimum structural design via convex model superposition. Comput Struct 74:639–647
Givoli D, Elishakoff I (1992) Stress concentration at a nearly circular hole with uncertain irregularities. J Appl Mech 59:65–71
Hajela P, Vittal S (2006) Optimal design in the presence of modeling uncertainties. J Aerosp Eng 19(4):204–216
Lombardi M (1998) Optimization of uncertain structures using non-probabilistic models. Comput Struct 67:99–103
Lombardi M, Haftka RT (1998) Anti-optimization technique for structural design under load uncertainties. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 157:19–31
Mistree F, Lautenschalager U, Erikstad SO (1993) Simulation relation using the Taguchi method. NASA CR 4542
Moore RE (1979) Methods and applications of interval analysis. Prentice-Hall, London
Qiu ZP, Wang XJ (2003) Comparison of dynamic response of structures with uncertain-but-bounded parameters using non-probabilistic interval analysis method and probabilistic approach. Int J Solids Struct 40(20):5423–5439
Ramakrishnan B, Rao SS (1991) A robust optimization approach using Taguchi’s loss function for solving nonlinear optimization problems. In: Advances in design automation, DE, vol 32– 1. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, pp 241–248
Rao SS, Majumder L (2008) Optimization of aircraft wings for gust loads: interval analysis-based approach. AIAA J 46(3):723–732
Suhuan C, Datong S, Wanzhi H (1994) Stochastic optimization for vibration systems of multi-degrees of freedom. Acta Mech Sin 26(4):432–439
Sundaresan S, Ishii K, Houser DR (1989) A procedure using manufacturing variance to design gears with minimum transmission error. In: Advances in design automation, design automation and design optimization, DE, vol 19–2. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, pp 145–151
Taguchi G (1987) System of experimental design. Unipub/Kraus International, White Plains
Teng A, Free J, Parkinson A (1992) An approach to robust design of dynamics systems-allocation of variation robust performance under parametric uncertainties. In: Proceedings of the AIAA/USAF/NASA/OAI 4th symposium on multidisciplinary analysis and optimization, AIAA, Washington, DC, pp 810–819
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Qiu, Z., Wang, X. Structural anti-optimization with interval design parameters. Struct Multidisc Optim 41, 397–406 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-009-0424-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-009-0424-y