Abstract
Under CH we show the following results:
-
(1)
There is a discrete ultrafilter which is not a \({\mathcal {Z}}_{0}\)-ultrafilter.
-
(2)
There is a \(\sigma \)-compact ultrafilter which is not a \({\mathcal {Z}}_{0}\)-ultrafilter.
-
(3)
There is a \({\mathcal {J}}_{\omega ^{3}}\)-ultrafilter which is not a \({\mathcal {Z}}_{0}\)-ultrafilter.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barney, C.: Ultrafilters on the natural numbers. J. Symb. Log. 68(3), 764–784 (2003)
Baumgartner, J.: Ultrafilters on \(\omega \). J. Symb. Log. 60(2), 624–639 (1995)
Brendle, J.: Between P-points and nowhere dense ultrafilters. Isr. J. Math. 13, 205–230 (1999)
Brendle, J., Flašková, J.: Generic existence of ultrafilters on the natural numbers. Fundam. Math. (to appear)
Flašková, J.: Ultrafilters and Small Sets, Ph.D. thesis, Charles University, Prague (2006)
Jech, T.: Set Theory. The third millennium edition, revised and expanded. Springer Monographs in Mathematics. Springer, Berlin (2003)
Kunen, K.: Set Theory: An Introduction to Independence Proof. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1980)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by NSFC Grant #10971149 and #11271272.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hong, J., Zhang, S. Relations between the \({\mathcal {I}}\)-ultrafilters. Arch. Math. Logic 56, 161–173 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-016-0520-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-016-0520-9