Skip to main content
Log in

Sibling rivalry and the gender gap: Evidence from child health outcomes in Ghana

Journal of Population Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

When capital and labor markets are imperfect, choice sets narrow, and parents must choose how to ration available funds and time between their children. One consequence is that children become rivals for household resources. In economies with pro-male bias, such rivalries can yield gains to having relatively more sisters than brothers. Using a rich household survey from Ghana, we find that on average if children had all sisters (and no brothers) they would do roughly 25-40% better on measured health indicators than if they had all brothers (and no sisters). The effects are as large as typical quantity-quality trade-offs, and they do not differ significantly by gender.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 22 May 1996 / Accepted: 13 July 1998

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garg, A., Morduch, J. Sibling rivalry and the gender gap: Evidence from child health outcomes in Ghana. J Popul Econ 11, 471–493 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s001480050080

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001480050080

Navigation