Skip to main content
Log in

The emergence of attractors under multi-level institutional designs: agent-based modeling of intergovernmental decision making for funding transportation projects

  • Original Article
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multi-level institutional designs with distributed power and authority arrangements among federal, state, regional, and local government agencies could lead to the emergence of differential patterns of socioeconomic and infrastructure development pathways in complex social–ecological systems. Both exogenous drivers and endogenous processes in social–ecological systems can lead to changes in the number of “basins of attraction,” changes in the positions of the basins within the state space, and changes in the positions of the thresholds between basins. In an effort to advance the theory and practice of the governance of policy systems, this study addresses a narrower empirical question: how do intergovernmental institutional rules set by federal, state, and regional government agencies generate and sustain basins of attraction in funding infrastructure projects? A pattern-oriented, agent-based model (ABM) of an intergovernmental network has been developed to simulate real-world transportation policy implementation processes across the federal, the state of Vermont, regional, and local governments for prioritizing transportation projects. The ABM simulates baseline and alternative intergovernmental institutional rule structures and assesses their impacts on financial investment flows. The ABM was calibrated with data from multiple focus groups, individual interviews, and analysis of federal, state, and regional scale transportation projects and programs. The results from experimental simulations are presented to test system-wide effects of alternative multi-level institutional designs, in particular different power and authority arrangements between state and regional governments, on the emergence of roadway project prioritization patterns and funding allocations across regions and towns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agranoff R, McGuire M (2003) Inside the matrix: integrating the paradigms of intergovernmental and network management. Int J Public Adm 26:1401–1422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batty M (2007) Cities and complexity: understanding cities with cellular automata, agent-based models, and fractals. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner FR, Jones BD (2002) Policy dynamics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm V, Revilla E, Berger U, Jeltsch F, Mooij WM, Railsback SF et al (2005) Pattern-oriented modeling of agent-based complex systems: lessons from ecology. Science 310:987–991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henson SM, Costantino RF, Desharnais RA, Cushing JM, Dennis B (2002) Basins of attraction: population dynamics with two stable 4-cycles. Oikos 98:17–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingram P, Robinson J, Busch ML (2005) The intergovernmental network of world trade: IGO connectedness, governance, and embeddedness. Am J Sociol 111:824–858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991, Pub. L. No. 102–240, 105 Stat 1914

  • Janssen MA, Ostrom E (2006) Empirically based, agent-based models. Ecol Soc 11(2): 37. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art37/

  • Jones C, Hesterly WS, Borgatti SP (1997) A general theory of network governance: exchange conditions and social mechanisms. Acad Manag Rev 22:911–945

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman S, Peterson C, Samuelsson B, Troein C (2004) Genetic networks with canalyzing Boolean rules are always stable. PNAS 101:17102–17107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kickert WJM, Klijn EH, Koppenjan JFM (1997) Managing complex networks: strategies for the public sector. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon JW (1984) In agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Little, Brown and Company, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Klijn EH (1996) Analyzing and managing policy processes in complex networks. Adm Soc 28:90–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koliba C, Meek J, Zia A (2010) Governance networks in public administration and public policy. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman P (1994) Complex landscapes in economic geography. Am Econ Rev 84:412–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh D, Rhodes RAW (1992) Policy networks in British government. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Milward HB, Provan KG (1998) Measuring network structure. Public Adm 76:387–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neary JP (1978) Dynamic stability and the theory of factor-market distortions. Am Econ Rev 68:671–682

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2005) Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole LJ (1997) Treating networks seriously: practical and research-based agendas in public administration. Public Adm Rev 57:45–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page F, Wooders M (2009) Strategic basins of attraction, the path dominance core, and network formation games. Games Econ Beh 66:462–487

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes RA (1997) Understanding governance: policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Open University Press, Maidenhead

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier P, Jenkins-Smith H (1993) Policy change and learning: an advocacy coalition approach. Westview Press, Boulder, CO

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer M, Carpenter S, Foley JA, Folke C, Walker B (2001) Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature 413:591–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taleb NN (2010) The Black Swan: the impact of the highly improbable fragility. Random House, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandermeer J, Granzow de la Cerda I, Perfecto I, Boucher D, Ruiz J, Kaufmann A (2004) Multiple basins of attraction in a tropical forest: evidence for nonequilibrium community structure. Ecology 85:575–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker B, Holling CS, Carpenter SR, Kinzig A (2004) Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc 9:5. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art5

  • Wuensche A (1999) Classifying cellular automata automatically: finding gliders, filtering, and relating space-time patterns, attractor basins, and the Z parameter. Complexity 4:47–66

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zia A, Koliba C (2011) Accountable climate governance: dilemmas of performance management across complex governance networks. J Comp Policy Anal Res Pract 13:479–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge funding from the United States Department of Transportation via the University of Vermont Transportation Research Center and National Science Foundation EPS-1101317. Authors bear complete responsibility for all the data and information provided in this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Asim Zia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zia, A., Koliba, C. The emergence of attractors under multi-level institutional designs: agent-based modeling of intergovernmental decision making for funding transportation projects. AI & Soc 30, 315–331 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-013-0527-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-013-0527-2

Keywords

Navigation