Skip to main content
Log in

Mutual learning: a systemic increase in learning efficiency to prepare for the challenges of the twenty-first century

  • 25th Anniversary Volume A Faustian Exchange: What is to be human in the era of Ubiquitous Technology?
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the few certainties we have about our collective future is that it will require a massive amount of learning, by just about everybody, everywhere. The time for generating as many creative and collaborative knowledge builders has come. Therefore, improving the efficiency of learning could very well become a key leverage point for successfully meeting the challenges of the twenty-first century. This paper explores the possibilities of using mutual learning as a systemic means to improve learning efficiencies. This is measured through three different metrics: (1) the time required to learn, (2) the quantity of learning that is retained over time, and (3) the leveraging of the cost of scholarships through the use of a complementary currency designed to track and encourage mutual learning. In all three metrics, mutual learning is shown as an important approach to increase the effectiveness of learning and, at the very least, can be an adjunct to the conventional educational methods. Mutual learning could apply not only to learning among peers, but also to social, intergenerational, or intercultural mutual learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A “complementary currency is” “an agreement within a community to accept something else than legal tender as a means of payment” (Lietaer 2004, 3).

References

  • Annis LF (1983) The processes and effects of peer tutoring. Human Learn 2:39–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura A (1997) Self-efficacy. New-York, W.H. Freeman and C

  • Bargh JA, Schul Y (1980) On the cognitive benefits of teaching. J Educ Psychol 72(5):593–604

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrows HS (1986) A taxonomy of problem-based learning methods. Med Educ 20(6):481–486

    Google Scholar 

  • Basham P, Merrifield J, Hepburn CR (2007) Home schooling: from the extreme to the mainstream, 2nd edn. Frazer Institute, Vancouver (Online). Available at http://www.rohus.nu/remissvar/bilagor/bilaga%207%20%E2%80%93%20Homeschooling%20-%20From%20the%20extreme%20to%20the%20mainstream.pdf. Accessed 2012/01/25

  • Brown JS, Collins A, Duguid P (1989) Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educ Res 18(1):32–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner JS (1990) Acts of meaning. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Carré P, Charbonnier O (2003) Les apprentissages professionnels informels. L’Harmattan, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Carré P, Fenouillet F (2008) Traité de psychologie de la motivation. Dunod, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter CJ, Fekete DF (2001) Reciprocal teaching: the application of a reading improvement strategy on urban students in Highland Park, Michigan, 1993–1995. UNESCO, International Bureau of Education, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Corno L (2001) Volitional aspects of self-regulated learning. In: Zimmerman BJ, Schunk DH (eds) Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: theoretical perspectives, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosnefroy L (2011) L’apprentissage auto-régulé: entre cognition et motivation. PUG, Grenoble

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale E (1946) Audio-visual methods in teaching. Dryden, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Despret V (2004) L’éthologie comme pratique des habitudes. In: Aubert JE, Landrieu J (eds) Vers des civilisations mondiales? De l’éthologie à la prospective. Editions de l’aube, La Tour d’Aigues, pp 59–71

  • Eraut M (2004) Informal learning in the workplace. Stud Continuing Educ 26(2):247–273

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (1994) Growth, competitiveness, and employment. The challenges and ways forward into the 21st century. Luxemburg, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities

  • European Commission (1995) Teaching and learning—towards a cognitive society. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxemburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Fantuzzo JW, Riggio RE, Connelly S, Dimeff LA (1989) Effects of reciprocal peer tutoring on academic achievement and psychological adjustment: a component analysis. J Educ Psychol 81(2):173–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire P (1970) Pedagogy of the oppressed. Herder and Herder, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner A, Kohler MK, Riessman F (1971) Children teach children: learning through teaching. Harper and Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg-Block M, Fantuzzo J (1997) Reciprocal peer tutoring: an analysis of “teacher” and “student” interactions as a function of training and experience. School Psychol Q 12(2):134–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gréard O (1911) Mutuel (Enseignement). Dictionnaire de pédagogie de Ferdinand Buisson (Online). Available at http://www.inrp.fr/edition-electronique/lodel/dictionnaire-ferdinand-buisson/document.php?id=3249&format=print. Accessed 2009/07/12

  • Greenwood CR, Delquadri JC, Hall RV (1989) Longitudinal effects of classwide peer tutoring. J Educ Psychol 81(3):371–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Grzega J, Schöner M (2007) The didactic model LdL (Lernen durch Lehren) as a way of preparing students for communication in a knowledge society. J Educ Teach 34(3):167–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauptman P (1982) Pierre-Joseph Proudhon. Sa vie et sa pensée, Editions Beauchesne

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilman KM, Nadeau SE, Beversdorf DO (2003) Creative innovation: possible brain mechanisms. Neurocase 9(5):369–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Illich YD (1971) Deschooling society. Harper & Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kettwig U (1986) Lernen durch Lehren, ein Plädoyer für lehrendes Lernen. Die deutsche Schule 4:474–485

  • Klassen TF (1988) Lernen durch Lehren, das Beispiel der Jenaplanschule Ulmbach. Zeitschrift Pädagogik 11:26–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb DA (1976) The learning styles inventory: technical manual. McBer, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb DA (1984) Experiential learning. Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Krüger R (1975) Projekt „Lernen durch Lehren“. Schüler als Tutoren von Mitschülern, Bad Heilbronn

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leelawong K, Biswas G (2008) Designing learning by teaching agents: the Betty’s Brain System. Int J Artif Intell Educ 18(3):181–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Lietaer B (2004) Complementary currencies in Japan today: history, originality and relevance. Int J Commun Curr Res 8:1–23 (Online). Available at http://www.uea.ac.uk/env/ijccr/pdfs/IJCCR%20vol%208%20(2004)%201%20Lietaer.pdf. Accessed 2009/10/03

    Google Scholar 

  • Lietaer B (2006) Proposal for a Brazilian education complementary currency. Int J Commun Curr Res 10:18–23 (Online) Available at http://www.uea.ac.uk/env/ijccr/pdfs/IJCCR%20vol%2010%20(2006)%203%20Lietaer.pdf. Accessed 2009/10/03

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone DW (2001) Adults’ informal learning: definitions, findings, gaps and future research. Centre for the Study of Education and Work, OISE/UT, Toronto (Online). Available at https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/bitstream/1807/2735/2/21adultsinformallearning.pdf. Accessed 2012/01/25

  • Martin J-P (1985) Zum Aufbau didaktischer Teilkompetenzen beim Schüler. Fremdsprachenunterricht auf der lerntheoretischen Basis des Informationsverarbeitungsansatzes. Dissertation, Narr, Tübingen

  • Martin J-P (1996) Das Projekt „Lernen durch Lehren“—eine vorläufige Bilanz. In: Henrici/Zöfgen (Hrsg.): Fremdsprachen Lehren und Lernen (FLuL). Themenschwerpunkt: Innovativ-alternative Methoden. Narr, Tübingen, vol 25, 70–86

  • OECD (1996) The knowledge-based economy. Paris, OECD. Downloaded on 2009/07/17 from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/51/8/1913021.pdf

  • Palincsar AS, Brown AL (1984) Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cogn Instr I(2):117–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Pask G (1975) Conversation, cognition and learning. Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pask G (1976a) Styles and strategies of learning. Br J Educ Psychol 46(2):128–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Pask G (1976b) Conversation theory: applications in education and epistemology. Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget J (1974) Réussir et comprendre. PUF, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Querrien A (2005) L’école mutuelle. Une pédagogie trop efficace?. Les empêcheurs de penser en rond/Le Seuil, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Renkl A (1997) Lernen durch Lehren. Zentrale Wirkmechanismen beim kooperativen Lernen. Deutscher Universitätsverlag, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Riding R, Rayner S (1998) Cognitive styles and learning strategies: understanding style differences in learning and behavior. David Fulton Publishers, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggio RE (2006) Reciprocal peer tutoring: learning through dyadic teaching (Online). Available at http://teachpsych.org/resources/e-books/eit2006/eit06-10.pdf. Accessed 2009/08/20

  • Savery JR (2006) Overview of problem-based learning: definitions and distinctions. Interdiscip J Problem-based Learn 1(1):9–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmeck RR (ed) (1988) Learning strategies and learning styles. Plenum Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schunk D, Meese J, Pintrich P (2009) Motivation in education: theory, research, and applications, 3rd edn. London & New York, Pearson

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz G (2008) Digital emancipation and local development in Brazil. Paper presented at Media@LSE fifth anniversary conference September 2008. http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/media@lse/Conference/. Accessed March 3, 2009. See also (www.cidade.usp.br). Accessed April 8, 2012

  • Suchman L (1987) Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Taddei F (2009) Training creative and collaborative Knowledge Builders: a major challenge for 21st century education. OECD, Paris. Downloaded on 2009/15/06 from: http://q.liberation.fr/pdf/20090414/10901_telechargez-le-rapport.pdf

  • Tough A (1971) The adult’s learning projects: a fresh approach to theory and practice in adult learning. OISE, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky LS (1986) Thought and language. MIT Press, Cambridge

  • Welch WW, Klopfer LE, Aikenhead GS, Robinson JT (1981) The role of inquiry in science education: analysis and recommendations. Sci Educ 65:33–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2012) The learning pyramid (online). Retrieved 2012/04/09 from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/DEVMARKETPLACE/Resources/Handout_TheLearningPyramid.pdf

  • Zimmerman BJ, Schunk DH (2008) Motivation: an essential dimension of self-regulated learning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernard Blandin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blandin, B., Lietaer, B. Mutual learning: a systemic increase in learning efficiency to prepare for the challenges of the twenty-first century. AI & Soc 28, 329–338 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-012-0427-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-012-0427-x

Keywords

Navigation