References
Enserick M. Scientific ethics. Final report on Stapel also blames field as a whole. Science 338:1270–1271
Ioannidis JP, Trikalinos TA, Zintzaras E (2006) Extreme between-study homogeneity in meta-analyses could offer useful insights. J Clin Epidemiol 59:1023–1032
Bhattacharjeet V. The mind of a con man. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/28/magazine/diederik-stapels-audacious-academic-fraud.html?_r=0. Accessed August 29, 2013
Wise J (2013) Boldt: the great pretender. BMJ 346:f1738
Boldt J, Müller M, Mentges D, Papsdorf M, Hempelmann G (1998) Volume therapy in the critically ill: is there a difference? Intensive Care Med 24(1):28–36
Fanelli D (2009) How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLoS ONE 4:e5738
Fanelli D (2010) “Positive” results increase down the Hierarchy of the Sciences. PLoS ONE 5:e10068
Wislar JS, Flanagin A, Fontanarosa PB et al (2012) Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross-sectional survey. BMJ 343:d6128
John LK, Loewenstein G, Prelec D (2012) Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth-telling. Psychol Sci. doi:10.1177/0956797611430953
Vul E, Harris C, Winkielman P, Pashler H (2009) Puzzlingly high correlations in fMRI studies of emotion, personality, and social cognition. Persp Psychol Sci 4:274–290
Fanelli D (2013) Redefine misconduct as distorted reporting. Nature 494:149
Alsheikh-Ali AA, Qureshi W, Al-Mallah MH, Ioannidis JP (2011) Public availability of published research data in high-impact journals. PLoS ONE 6:e24357
Doshi P, Jefferson T, Del Mar C (2012) The imperative to share clinical study reports: recommendations from the Tamiflu experience. PLoS Med 9:e1001201
Ioannidis JP (2012) The importance of potential studies that have not existed and registration of observational data sets. JAMA 308:575–576
Ioannidis JP (2013) Scientific inbreeding and same-team replication: type D personality as an example. J Psychosom Res 73:408–410
Conflicts of interest
The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ioannidis, J.P.A. Research accomplishments that are too good to be true. Intensive Care Med 40, 99–101 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-013-3100-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-013-3100-z