Why substitute decision makers provide or decline consent for ICU research studies: a questionnaire study
Consent for research participation in the intensive care unit (ICU) is often obtained from a substitute decision maker (SDM). In this study we explored SDMs’ reasons for declining or providing consent for research studies for critically ill adult family members.
Two questionnaires were developed, one directed at SDMs who agreed to have their relative participate in a research study (AGREE group), and another for SDMs who declined participation (DECLINE group). The questionnaires explored SDMs’ opinions about research in general, timing of research approach, the informed consent process, and reasons for agreeing or declining participation.
Ninety-six SDMs completed the questionnaire (68 AGREE, 27 DECLINE). There were no differences between AGREE and DECLINE groups with respect to SDM demographics, perceived severity of illness of the patient, or the research study approach. The most common reasons for providing consent were potential for research to help others (91%), research is important for medical progress (88%), and trust in the medical team (87%). The most common reasons for declining consent were SDM was too anxious to consider research (67%), fear that patient would receive experimental treatment (37%), and concern about risks of the study (33%).
SDMs who agree to have a relative participate in an ICU research study are motivated by the potential benefit to the patient and altruism. SDMs who decline research participation, while not generally opposed to research, are fearful of study-related harm or discomfort for the patient, and are too anxious to consider a research study at that time.
- Luce, JM (2003) Is the concept of informed consent applicable to clinical research involving critically ill patients?. Crit Care Med 31: pp. S153-S160 CrossRef
- Luce, JM, Cook, DJ, Martin, TR, Angus, DC, Boushey, HA, Curtis, JR, Heffner, JE, Lanken, PN, Levy, MM, Polite, PY, Rocker, GM, Truog, RD (2004) The ethical conduct of clinical research involving critically ill patients in the United States and Canada: principles and recommendations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 170: pp. 1375-1384 CrossRef
- Ciroldi, M, Cariou, A, Adrie, C, Annane, D, Castelain, V, Cohen, Y, Delahaye, A, Joly, LM, Galliot, R, Garrouste-Orgeas, M, Papazian, L, Michel, F, Barnes, NK, Schlemmer, B, Pochard, F, Azoulay, E (2007) Ability of family members to predict patient’s consent to critical care research. Intensive Care Med 33: pp. 807-813 CrossRef
- Coppolino, M, Ackerson, L (2001) Do surrogate decision makers provide accurate consent for intensive care research?. Chest 119: pp. 603-612 CrossRef
- Stuijvenberg, M, Suur, MH, Vos, S, Tjiang, GCH, Steyerberg, EW, Derksen-Lubsen, E, Moll, HA (1998) Informed consent, parental awareness, and reasons for participating in a randomised controlled study. Arch Dis Child 79: pp. 120-125 CrossRef
- Sammons, HM, Atkinson, M, Choonara, I, Stephenson, T (2007) What motivates British parents to consent for research? A questionnaire study. BMC Pediatr 7: pp. 12 CrossRef
- Sugarman, J, Cain, C, Wallace, R, Welsh-Bohmer, KA (2001) How proxies make decisions about research for patients with Alzheimer’s disease. J Am Geriatr Soc 49: pp. 1110-1119 CrossRef
- Azoulay, E, Chevret, S, Leleu, G, Pochard, F, Barboteu, M, Adrie, C, Canoui, P, Le Gall, JR, Schlemmer, B (2000) Half the families of intensive care unit patients experience inadequate communication with physicians. Crit Care Med 28: pp. 3044-3049 CrossRef
- Chappuy, H, Baruchel, A, Leverger, G, Oudot, C, Brethon, B, Haouy, S, Auvrignon, A, Davous, D, Doz, F, Tréluyer, JM (2010) Parental comprehension and satisfaction in informed consent in paediatric clinical trials: a prospective study on childhood leukaemia. Arch Dis Child 95: pp. 800-804 CrossRef
- Burns, KEA, Zubrinich, C, Tan, W, Smith, O, McDonald, E, Skrobik, Y, Saginur, R, Jeffs, L, Marshall, J, Heslegrave, R, Rubenfeld, GD, Cook, DJ (2010) Understanding barriers to recruitment and why patients and surrogates consent for Critical Care research: The Consent Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 181: pp. A6047
- Barrett, K, Athaide, V, Smith, OM, McDonald, E, Pinto, R, Stevenson, J, Go, S, Elman, J, Friedrich, JP, Cook, DJ, Scales, DC, Ferguson, ND (2009) Proxy evaluations rating methods for inclusion into trials (PERMIT 2). Am J Respir Crit Care Med 179: pp. A1573
- Azoulay, E, Pochard, F, Kentish-Barnes, N, Chevret, S, Aboab, J, Adrie, C, Annane, D, Bleichner, G, Bollaert, PE, Darmon, M, Fassier, T, Galliot, R, Garrouste-Orgeas, M, Goulenok, C, Goldgran-Toledano, D, Hayon, J, Jourdain, M, Kaidomar, M, Laplace, C, Larche, J, Liotier, J, Papazian, L, Poisson, C, Reignier, J, Al Saidi, F, Schlemmer, B (2005) Risk of post-traumatic stress symptoms in family members of intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 171: pp. 987-994 CrossRef
- Why substitute decision makers provide or decline consent for ICU research studies: a questionnaire study
Intensive Care Medicine
Volume 38, Issue 1 , pp 47-54
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Substitute decision makers
- Clinical trials
- Intensive care unit
- Informed consent
- Proxy consent
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Medicine and Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, 600 University Ave, 18-216, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X5, Canada
- 2. Department of Pharmacy, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada