Abstract
Purpose
While research demands standardized diagnostic assessments as an indication of sufficient methodological rigour, there is debate about their application to clinical practice. The Development and Well-Being Assessment (DAWBA) provides a structured assessment of psychiatric disorder. Since it can be completed on-line, it could be used by Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services with few additional demands on staff. Access to the standardized diagnostic information as an adjunct to clinical assessment could reduce the number of appointments spent on assessment, free up practitioner time to work on engagement and improve clinical outcomes by increasing the accuracy of assessment and thus access to the appropriate evidence-based treatment.
Method
Randomized controlled trial of the disclosure of the DAWBA to the assessing practitioner (n = 117) versus assessment at normal (n = 118) and analysed by “intention to disclose”.
Results
Exposure to the DAWBA may increase agreement between the DAWBA and practitioners about some anxiety disorders, but detected no other statistically significant increased agreement for other disorders, nor a reduced need for further assessment, the number of difficulties recognised or influence on outcomes.
Conclusions
The results may be explained by the inadequacy of the DAWBA, lack of statistical power to detect any effects that were present or a reluctance of some practitioners to use the DAWBA in their assessment. Future research might benefit from exploring the use of the DAWBA or similar assessments as a referral rather than an assessment tool, and exploring how practitioners and parents experience and use the DAWBA and what training might optimise the utility of the DAWBA to clinical practice.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Foreman D, Foreman D, Prendergast M, Minty B (2001) Is clinic prevalence of ICD-10 hyperkinesis underestimated? Impact of increasing awareness by a questionnaire. Eur J Child Adolesc Psychiatry 10:130–134
Ford T, Hamilton H, Goodman R, Meltzer H (2005) Service contacts among the children participating in the British child and adolescent mental health. Child Adolesc Mental Health 10:2–9
Martin A, Fishman R, Baxter L, Ford T (2011) Practitioners’ attitudes to standardized diagnostic assessment in routine practice: a qualitative study in two Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry 16(3):407–420
Jones J (2004) The post-registration education and training for nurses working with children and young people with mental health problem. RCN Institute, London
Lindsay C, Griffiths P (2004) Developing a comprehensive CAMHS. YoungMinds Magazine 73:31–33
Shah P, Mountain D (2007) The medical model is dead: long live the medical model. Br J Psychiatry 19:375–377
Weinstein SR, Stone K, Noam GG, Grimes K, Schwab-Stone M (1989) Comparison of DISC with practitioner’s DSM-III diagnoses in psychiatric inpatients. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 28:53–60
Aronen ET, Noam GG, Weinstein SR (1993) Structured diagnostic interviews and practitioner’s discharge diagnoses in hospitalized adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 32:674–681
Jensen AL, Weisz JR (2002) Assessing match and mismatch between practitioner-generated and standardized interview-generated diagnoses for clinic-referred children and adolescents. J Consult Clin Psychol 70:158–168
Hawley KM, Weisz JR (2005) Youth versus parent working alliance in usual clinical care: distinctive associations with retention, satisfaction and treatment outcome. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 34:117–128
Basco MR, Bostic JQ, Davies D, Rush AJ, Witte B, Hendrickse W et al (2000) Methods to improve diagnostic accuracy in a community mental health setting. Am J Psychiatry 157(10):1599–1605
Horvath AO, Luborsky L (1993) The role of the therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy. J Consult Clin Psychol 61:561–573
Jensen Doss A, Weisz JR (2008) Diagnostic agreement predicts treatment process and outcomes in youth mental health clinics. J Consult Clin Psychol 76:711–722
Goodman A, Heiervang E, Collishaw S, Goodman R (2011) The ‘DAWBA bands’ as an ordered categorical measure of child mental health: description and validation in British and Norwegian samples. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 46:521–532
Goodman R, Ford T, Simmons H, Gatward R, Meltzer H (2000) Using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) to screen for child psychiatric disorders in a community sample. Br J Psychiatry 177:534–539
Goodman R (2001) Psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 40:1337–1345
Wolpert M, Fuggle P, Cottrell D, Fonagy P, Phillips J, Pilling S, Stein S, Target M (2006) Drawing on the evidence, vol 2. CAMHS Publications, London, p 17
Shaffer D, Gould MS, Brasic J, Ambrosini P, Fisher P, Bird H, Aluwahlia S (1983) A children’s global assessment scale (CGAS). Arc Gen Psychiatry 40(11):1228–1231
Sourander A, Helenius H, Piha J (1996) Outcome of short-term child psychiatric hospitalization (teacher evaluation at 5-month and 12-month follow up). Eur J Child Adolesc Psychiatry 5:204–211
Matts JP, Lachin JM (1998) Properties of permuted-block randomization in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 9:327–344
Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174
Dewey ME (1983) Coefficients of agreement. Br J Psychiatry 143:487–489
Department of Communities and Local Government (2007) The English indices of multiple deprivation. HMSO, London
Hunter J, Higginson I, Garralda E (1996) Systematic literature review: outcome measures for child and adolescent mental health services. J Public Health Med 18(2):197–206
Meltzer M, Gatward R, Goodman R, Ford TJ (2000) The Mental Health of children and adolescents in Great Britain. The Stationery Office, London
Meltzer H, Lader D, Corbin T, Goodman R, Ford T (2004) The mental health of young people looked after by local authorities in Scotland. The Stationery Office, Edinburgh
Gelman A, Hill J (2006) Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge University Press, cambridge
Schenker N, Gentleman JF (2001) On judging the significance of differences by examining the overlap between confidence intervals. Am Statist 55(3):182–186
Last A, Ford T, Henley W, Norman S, Goodman R. Feasibility of the Development and Well Being Assessment as an adjunct to clinical assessment in child and adolescent mental health services. Child Adoles Mental Health (submitted 16 July 2012)
Norman SM, Dean S, Hansford L, Ford T. Clinical practitioner’s attitudes towards the use of routine outcome monitoring within Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services: a qualitative study of two Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (in submission)
Aebi M, Kuhn C, Winkler Metke C, Stringaris A, Goodman R, Steinhausen HC. The use of the Development and Well-Being Assessment in clinical practice: a clinical trial. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry (submitted 20 February 2012)
Ferrante di Ruffano L, Hyde CJ, McCaffery KM, Bossuyt PMM, Deeks JJ (2012) Assessing the value of diagnostic tests: a framework for designing and evaluating trials. BMJ 344:18–22
Norman SM (2011) Factors influencing the outcomes of children utilizing CAMHS. PhD Thesis, Peninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Exeter, Exeter
Martin AM, Fishman R, Baxter L, Ford TF (2011) Practitioner Attitudes to Standardised Diagnostic Assessment: a qualitative study in two CAMHS. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry 16:407–420
Acknowledgments
We are extremely grateful to the two child and adolescent mental health services that hosted` the study, and to the parents and practitioners who gave up their time to participate, and to the Medical Research Council in England who funded the original project as part of a Clinician Scientist Fellowship for Tamsin Ford.
Conflicts of interest
RG is the owner of Youthinmind, which provides no-cost and low-cost software and web sites related to the SDQ and DAWBA. TF was supported by a Clinician Scientist award from the Medical Research Council in England to complete this work. Anna Last, Shelley Norman and William Henley completed this work while supported by the Collaboration for Applied Health Services Research and Care (CLAHRC) for the South West of England. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health. None of these funders had any influence over the design, analysis or writing up of this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Trial registration number: ICRCTN31394658.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ford, T., Last, A., Henley, W. et al. Can standardized diagnostic assessment be a useful adjunct to clinical assessment in child mental health services? A randomized controlled trial of disclosure of the Development and Well-Being Assessment to practitioners. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 48, 583–593 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-012-0564-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-012-0564-z