Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Is terror gender-blind? Gender differences in reaction to terror events

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

This study examines gender differences in posttraumatic vulnerability in the face of the terror attacks that occurred during the Al-Aqsa Intifada. In addition, the contribution of level of exposure, sense of safety, self-efficacy, and coping strategies is assessed.

Method

Participants were 250 men and 262 women, who constitute a representative sample of Israel's adult population. Data were collected via a structured questionnaire consisting of 51 items that were drawn from several questionnaires widely used in the study of trauma.

Results

The findings indicate that women endorsed posttraumatic and depressive symptoms more than men and that, generally, their odds of developing posttraumatic stress symptoms are six times higher than those of men. Results also revealed that women's sense of safety and self-efficacy are lower than men's and that there are gender differences in coping strategies in the face of terror.

Conclusions

Gender differences in vulnerability to terror may be attributable to a number of factors, among these are women's higher sense of threat and lower self-efficacy, as well as their tendency to use less effective coping strategies than men. Level of exposure to terror was ruled out as a possible explanation for the gender differences in vulnerability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Palinkas LA, Petterson JS, Russell J, Downs MA (1993) Community patterns of psychiatric disorders after the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Am J Psychiatry 150(10):1517–1523

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Breslau N, Kessler RC, Chilcoat HD, Schultz LR, Davis GC, Anderski P (1998) Trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder in the community: the 1996 Detroit area survey of trauma. Arch Gen Psychiatry 55:626–632

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kessler RC, Sonnega A, Bromet E, Hughes M, Nelson CB (1995) Posttraumatic stress disorder in the National Comorbidity Survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry 52(12):1048–1060

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brewin CR, Andrews B, Valentine JD (2000) Meta-analysis of risk factors for posttraumatic stress disorder in trauma-exposed adults. J Consult Clin Psychol 68(6):748–766

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. DeLisi LE, Maurizio A, Yost M, Papparozzi CF, Fulchino C, Katz CL, Altesman J, Biel M, Lee J, Stevens P (2003) A survey of New Yorkers after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. Am J Psychiatry 160(4):780–783

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schlenger WE, Caddell JM, Ebert L, Jordan BK, Rourke KM, Wilson D, Thalji L, Dennis JM, Fairbank JA, Kulka RA (2002) Psychological reactions to terrorist attacks: findings from the National Study of Americans' Reactions to September 11. JAMA 288(5):581–588

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bar-Tal Y, Lurie O, Glick D (1994) The effect of gender on the stress process of Israeli soldiers during the Gulf War. Anxiety Stress Coping Int J 7(3):263–276

    Google Scholar 

  8. Benight CC, Harper LL (2002) Coping self-efficacy perceptions as a mediator between acute stress response and long-term distress following natural disasters. J Trauma Stress 15(3):177–186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Benight CC, Swift E, Sanger J, Smith A, Zeppelin D (1999) Coping self-efficacy as a mediator of distress following a natural disaster. J Appl Soc Psychol 29(12):2443–2464

    Google Scholar 

  10. Karanci AN, Alkan N, Askit B, Sucuoglu H, Blata E (1999) Gender differences in psychological distress, coping, social support and related variables following the 1995 Dinar (Turkey) earthquake. N Am J Psychol 1(2):189–204

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ptacek JT, Smith RE, Dodge KL (1994) Gender differences in coping with stress: when stressor and appraisals do not differ. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 20(4):421–430

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gavranidou M, Rosner R (2003) The weaker sex? gender and post-traumatic stress disorder. Depress Anxiety 17:130–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Norris FH, Perilla JL, Ibanez GE, Murphy AD (2001) Sex differences in symptoms of posttraumatic stress: does culture play a role? J Trauma Stress 14(1):7–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bryant RA, Harvey AG (2003) Gender differences in the relationship between acute stress disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder following motor vehicle accidents. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 37(2):226–229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. The Central Bureau of Statistics (2001) Statistical abstract of Israel. The Central Bureau of Statistics, Jerusalem

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cardena E, Classen K, Spiegel D (1991) Stanford Acute Stress Reaction Questionnaire. Stanford University Medical School, Stanford, CA

    Google Scholar 

  17. Carver CS, Scheier MF, Weintraub JK (1989) Assessing coping strategies: a theoretically based approach. J Pers Soc Psychol 56:267–283

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bleich A, Gelkopf M, Solomon Z (2003) Exposure to terrorism, stress-related mental health symptoms, and coping behaviors among a nationally representative sample in Israel. JAMA 290(5):612–690

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Murphy SA, Johnson LC, Chung IJ, Beaton RD (2003) The prevalence of PTSD following the violent death of a child and predictors of change 5 years later. J Trauma Stress 16(1):17–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Schauben LJ, Frazier PA (1995) Vicarious trauma: the effects on female counselors of working with sexual violence survivors. Psychol Women Q 19(1):49–64

    Google Scholar 

  21. Saigh PA (1997) A comparative analysis of the future orientation ratings of traumatized youth. In: Saigh PA (ed) Current research on child adolescent posttraumatic stress disorder. Symposium conducted at the Annual Meeting of the International Society of Traumatic Stress Studies, Montreal Canada

  22. Stein MB, Walker JR, Forde DR (2000) Gender differences in susceptibility to posttraumatic stress disorder. Behav Res Ther 38(6):619–628

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bar-Yosef R, Padan-Eisenstrak D (1977) Role system under stress: sex-roles in war. Soc Probl 25:135–145

    Google Scholar 

  24. Solomon Z (1995) Coping with war-induced stress: the Gulf War and the Israeli response. Plenum, New York

    Google Scholar 

  25. Folkman S, Lazarus RS (1980) An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample. J Health Soc Behav 21(3):219–239

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hobfoll SE, Dunahoo CL, Ben-Porath Y, Monnier J (1994) Gender and coping: the dual-axis model of coping. Am J Community Psychol 22(1):49–82

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dohrenwend BS, Dohrenwend BP (1976) Sex differences and psychiatric disorders. AJS 81:1447–1472

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Strobe MS, Strobe W (1983) Who suffers more? Sex differences in depressive symptomatology: a community study. J Health Soc Behav 14:291–299

    Google Scholar 

  29. Greenglass ER (1995) Gender, work stress, and coping: theoretical implications. J Soc Behav Pers 10(6):121–134

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hovanitz CA, Kozora E (1989) Life stress and clinically elevated MMPI scales: gender differences in the moderating influence of coping. J Clin Psychol 45(5):766–777

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank Danny Horesh for his help in preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Solomon, Z., Gelkopf, M. & Bleich, A. Is terror gender-blind? Gender differences in reaction to terror events. Soc Psychiat Epidemiol 40, 947–954 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-005-0973-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-005-0973-3

Key words

Navigation