Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of ecological factors on the initial invasion of Bt transgenes into wild populations of birdseed rape (Brassica rapa)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The inevitable escape of transgenic pollen from cultivated fields will lead to the emergence of transgenic crop-wild plant hybrids in natural patches of wild plants. The fate of these hybrids and that of the transgene depend on their ability to compete with their wild relatives. Here we study ecological factors that may enhance the fitness of genetically modified hybrids relative to wild plants for a Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) transgene conferring resistance to insects. Mixed stands of wild plants and first-generation hybrids were grown under different conditions of herbivore pressure and density, with Bt oilseed rape (Brassica napus) as the crop and B. rapa as the wild recipient. Biomass and fitness components were measured from plant germination to the germination of their offspring. The frequency of transgenic seedlings in the offspring generation was estimated using the green fluorescent protein marker. The biomass of F1 Bt-transgenic hybrids relative to that of wild-type plants was found to be sensitive to both plant density and herbivore pressure, but herbivore pressure appeared as the major factor enhancing their relative fitnesses. In the absence of herbivore pressure, Bt hybrids produced 6.2-fold fewer seeds than their wild neighbors, and Bt plant frequency fell from 50% to 16% within a single generation. Under high herbivore pressure, Bt hybrids produced 1.4-fold more seeds, and Bt plant frequency was 42% in the offspring generation. We conclude that high-density patches of highly damaged wild plants are the most vulnerable to Bt-transgene invasion. They should be monitored early to detect potential transgene spread.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2a–c
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chèvre A-M, Eber F, Baranger A, Renard M (1997) Gene flow from transgenic crops. Nature 389:924

    Google Scholar 

  • Damgaard C, Weiner J, Nagashima H (2002) Modelling individual growth and competition in plant populations: growth curves of Chenopodium album at two densities. J Ecol 90:666–671

    Google Scholar 

  • Darmency H, Lefol E, Fleury A (1998) Spontaneous hybridizations between oilseed rape and wild radish. Mol Ecol 7:1467–1473

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellstrand NC (2001) When transgenes wander, should we worry? Plant Physiol 125:1543–1545

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellstrand NC, Schirenbeck KA (2000) Hybridization as a stimulus for the evolution of invasiveness in plants? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:7043–7050

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellstrand NC, Whitkus R, Rieseberg LH (1996) Distribution of spontaneous plant hybrids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:5090–5093

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellstrand NC, Prentice HC, Hancock JF (1999) Gene flow and introgression from domesticated plants into their wild relatives. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 30:539–563

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox GA (2003) Assortative mating and plant phenology: evolutionary and practical consequences. Evol Ecol Res 5:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Hails RS (2000) Genetically modified plants: the debate continue. TREE 15:14–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Hails RS (2002) Assessing the risks associated with new agricultural practices. Nature 418:685–688

    Google Scholar 

  • Halfhill MD, Richards HA, Mabon SA, Stewart CN (2001) Expression of GFP and Bt transgenes in Brassica napus and hybridization with Brassica rapa. Theor Appl Genet 103:659–667

    Google Scholar 

  • Halfhill MD, Millwood RJ, Raymer PL, Stewart CN (2002) Bt-transgenic oilseed rape hybridization with its weedy relative Brassica rapa. Environ Biosafety Res 1:19–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper BK, Mabon SA, Leffel SM, Halfhill MD, Richards HA, Moyer KA, Stewart CN (1999) Green fluorescent protein as a marker for expression of a second gene in transgenic plants. Nat Biotechnol 17:1125–1129

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser TP, Jorgensen RB, Ostergard H (1998a) Fitness of backcross and F2 hybrids between weedy Brassica rapa and oilseed rape (B. napus). Heredity 81:436–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser TP, Shaw RG, Ostergard H (1998b) Fitness of F1 hybrids between weedy Brassica rapa and oilseed rape (B. napus). Heredity 81:436–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Isawa Y, Kubo T (1997) Optimal size of storage for recovery after unpredictable disturbances. Evol Ecol 11:41–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenczewsky E, Prosperi J-M, Ronfort J (1999) Evidence for gene flow between wild and cultivated Medicago sativa (Leguminosae) based on allozyme markers and quantitative traits. Am J Bot 86:677–687

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen RB, Andersen B (1994) Spontaneous hybridization between oilseed rape (Brassica napus) and weedy B. campestris (Brassicaceae): a risk of growing genetically modified oilseed rape. Am J Bot 81:1620–1626

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen RB, Hauser T, Mikkelsen TR, Ostergard H (1996) Transfer of engineered genes from crop to wild plants. Trends Plant Sci 1:356–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplinsky N, Braun D, Lisch D, Hay A, Hake S, Freeling M (2002) Maize transgene results in Mexico are artefacts. Nature 416:601–602

    Google Scholar 

  • Kareiva P, Morris W, Jacobi CM (1994) Studying and managing the risk of cross-fertilization between transgenic crops and wild relatives. Mol Ecol 3:15–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Keane RM, Crawley MJ (2002) Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. TREE 17:164–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Kling J (1996) Could transgenic supercrops one day breed superweeds? Science 274:180–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin DA (1983) Polyploidy and novelty in flowering plants. Am Nat 122:1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Li CC (1975) Path analysis: a primer. Boxwood Press, Pacific Grove, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masterson J (1994) Stomatal size in fossil plants: evidence for polyploidy in majority of angiosperms. Science 264:421–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikkelsen TR, Andersen B, Jorgensen RB (1996) The risk of crop transgene spread. Nature 380:31

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell CE, Power AG (2003) Release of invasive plantes from fungal and viral pathogens. Nature 421:625–627

    Google Scholar 

  • Pertl M, Hauser TP, Damgaard C, Jorgensen RB (2002) Male fitness of oilseed rape (Brassica napus), weedy B. rapa and their F1 hybrids when pollinating B. rapa seeds. Heredity 89:212–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Quist D, Chapela IH (2001) Transgenic DNA introgressed into traditional maize landraces in Oaxaca, Mexico. Nature 414:541–543

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven PH (1976) Systematics and plant population biology. Syst Bot 1:284–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Raybould AF, Gray AJ (1994) Will hybrids of genetically modified crops invade natural communities? TREE 9:85–89

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS (1999) SAS/STAT user’s guide, version 8. SAS Institute, Cary, N.C.

  • Snow AA (2002) Transgenic crops: why gene flow matters? Nat Biotechnol 20:542

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow AA, Pilson D, Rieseberg LH, Paulsen MJ, Pleskac N, Reagon MR, Wolf DE, Selbo SM (2003) A Bt transgene reduces herbivory and enhances fecundity in wild sunflowers. Ecol Appl 13:279–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltis DE, Soltis PS (1999) Polyploidy: recurrent formation and genome evolution. TREE 14:348–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltis PS, Soltis DE (2000) The role of genetic and genomic attributes in the success of polyploids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:7051–7057

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins GL (1959) The role of hybridization in evolution. Proc Am Philos Soc 103:231–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Weis AE, Hochberg ME (2000) The diverse effects of intraspecific competition on the selective advantage to resistance: a model and its predictions. Am Nat 156:276–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitham TG, Morrow PA, Potts BM (1991) Conservation of hybrids plants. Science 254:779–780

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson MJ, Elliott LJ, Allainguillaume J, Shaw MW, Norris C, Welters R, Alexander M, Sweet J, Mason DC (2003) Hybridization between Brassica napus and B. rapa on a National Scale in the United Kingdom. Science 302: 457–459

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfenbarger LL, Phifer PR (2000) The ecological risks and benefits of genetically engineered plants. Science 290:2088–2093

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfram S (1999) The mathematica book, 4th edn. Wolfram Media/Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Ruth Shaw and Isabelle Olivieri for helpful comments. We acknowledge financial support from the French Ministry of Research and Education and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (ACI: “Impact des biotechnologies dans les agro-écosystèmes”).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Corinne Vacher.

Additional information

Communicated by H.C. Becker

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vacher, C., Weis, A.E., Hermann, D. et al. Impact of ecological factors on the initial invasion of Bt transgenes into wild populations of birdseed rape (Brassica rapa). Theor Appl Genet 109, 806–814 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-004-1696-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-004-1696-7

Keywords

Navigation