Zusammenfassung
Hintergrund
Erektionsstörungen nach radikaler Prostatektomie (RPx) beeinflussen nicht nur das Sexualleben der Patienten, sondern auch das ihrer Partnerinnen. In der vorliegenden Arbeit wurde die Sexualität von Paaren, die 12 Monate nach nervschonender RPx Geschlechtsverkehr (GV) haben, 60 Monate postoperativ reevaluiert.
Patienten und Methode
36 Patienten (♂) und deren Partnerinnen (♀), die präoperativ und 12 Monate nach nerverhaltender RPx GV hatten, wurden 60 Monate postoperativ Fragebögen zugesandt, die die Häufigkeit des GV, die Zufriedenheit mit dem Sexualleben, die Verwendung von Hilfsmitteln, sowie die Sexualfunktion [♂: „International Index of Erectile Function 5“ (IIEF-5), ♀: „Female Sexual Function Index“ (FSFI)] erfassten.
Ergebnisse
Bei einer Rücklaufquote von 83,3 % bestand das auswertbare Kollektiv aus 30 Paaren. 70,0 % der Paare hatten 60 Monate postoperativ GV. Die Paare, die 60 Monate postoperativ GV hatten, waren wesentlich zufriedener (12 und 60 Monate postoperativ), hatten mehr GV (präoperativ und 12 Monate postoperativ), höhere IIEF-5-Scores (12 Monate postoperativ) und häufiger bilateral nervschonende Operationen als Paare, die 60 Monate postoperativ keinen GV hatten. Sie benutzten nach 60 Monaten in 80,0 % der Fälle keine Hilfsmittel oder ausschließlich PDE-5-Inhibitoren. Die Partnerinnen waren postoperativ zufriedener mit dem Sexualleben als die Patienten selbst. Paare, bei denen der Mann nach 60 Monaten einen IIEF-5-Score ≥ 19 hatte, waren zufriedener, hatten häufiger GV pro Monat und die Partnerinnen hatten höhere FSFI-Scores als jene Paare mit einem IIEF-5-Score < 19.
Schlussfolgerung
Paare, die 12 Monate nach RPx wieder GV haben, können dies meist auch langfristig weiterführen. Paare, die langfristig GV haben, sind zufriedener und hatten schon präoperativ und 1 Jahr postoperativ häufiger GV.
Abstract
Background
Erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy (RPx) does affect the sexual life of patients and their partners. In our study, we evaluated sexual life over the long-term of 60 months following nerve-sparing (ns) RPx in couples who successfully performed sexual intercourse (SI) 12 months after surgery.
Patients and method
A total of 36 patients and their female partners who had SI prior to and 12 months after nsRPx were included in this study. Sixty months following nsRPx, couples were asked about frequency of SI, satisfaction of sexual life, usage of medical aid for erections, and sexual function [patients: IIEF-5 (International Index of Erectile Function), partners: FSFI (Female Sexual Function Index)].
Results
Thirty couples (83.3%) were available for follow-up. A total of 70% of couples performed SI 60 months after nsRPx. In contrast to couples who did not have SI 60 months after nsRPx, couples who successfully had SI were more satisfied, had SI more often, had higher IIEF-5 scores, and higher frequency of bilateral ns surgery. In 80% of those patients, no medical aid except PDE-5 inhibitors were used. The partners of those patients were more satisfied with their sexual life, compared to the patients themselves. Couples, in whom the patient had IIEF-5 scores ≥19 were more satisfied, had SI more often, and the partners had higher FSFI scores, compared to couples with patients’ IIEF-5 scores <19.
Conclusion
Couples who had successfully performed SI within 12 months following nsRPx continue to have satisfying SI in the long-term. Those couples are more satisfied with their sexual life and have SI more often prior to and 12 months after nsRPx.
Literatur
Albersen MJS, Van Poppel H (2009) The Use of IIEF-5 for reporting erectile dysfunction following nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Open Prost Cancer J 2:1–9
Bannowsky A, Raileanu A, Uckert S et al (2013) Rehabilitation of erectile function after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: therapeutic concepts in Germany. Urologe A 52:1679–1683
Bannowsky A, Schulze H, Van Der Horst C et al (2005) Erectile function after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Nocturnal early erection as a parameter of postoperative organic erectile integrity. Urologe A 44:521–526
Boehmer U, Babayan RK (2004) Facing erectile dysfunction due to prostate cancer treatment: perspectives of men and their partners. Cancer Invest 22:840–848
Boorjian SA, Eastham JA, Graefen M et al (2012) A critical analysis of the long-term impact of radical prostatectomy on cancer control and function outcomes. Eur Urol 61:664–675
Carroll JL, Bagley DH (1990) Evaluation of sexual satisfaction in partners of men experiencing erectile failure. J Sex Marital Ther 16:70–78
Cayan S, Bozlu M, Canpolat B et al (2004) The assessment of sexual functions in women with male partners complaining of erectile dysfunction: does treatment of male sexual dysfunction improve female partner’s sexual functions? J Sex Marital Ther 30:333–341
Crowe H, Costello AJ (2003) Prostate cancer: perspectives on quality of life and impact of treatment on patients and their partners. Urol Nurs 23:279–285
Descazeaud A, Debre B, Flam TA (2006) Age difference between patient and partner is a predictive factor of potency rate following radical prostatectomy. J Urol 176:2594–2598
Dubbelman YD, Dohle GR, Schroder FH (2006) Sexual function before and after radical retropubic prostatectomy: a systematic review of prognostic indicators for a successful outcome. Eur Urol 50:711–720
Gacci M, Simonato A, Masieri L et al (2009) Urinary and sexual outcomes in long-term (5+ years) prostate cancer disease free survivors after radical prostatectomy. Health Qual Life Outcomes 7:94
Glickman L, Godoy G, Lepor H (2009) Changes in continence and erectile function between 2 and 4 years after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 181:731–735
Goldstein I, Fisher WA, Sand M et al (2005) Women’s sexual function improves when partners are administered vardenafil for erectile dysfunction: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Sex Med 2:819–832
Heathcote PS, Mactaggart PN, Boston RJ et al (1998) Health-related quality of life in Australian men remaining disease-free after radical prostatectomy. Med J Aust 168:483–486
Hollenbeck BK, Dunn RL, Wei JT et al (2003) Determinants of long-term sexual health outcome after radical prostatectomy measured by a validated instrument. J Urol 169:1453–1457
Hurlbert DF, Apt C, Rabehl SM (1993) Key variables to understanding female sexual satisfaction: an examination of women in nondistressed marriages. J Sex Marital Ther 19:154–165
Litwin MS, Melmed GY, Nakazon T (2001) Life after radical prostatectomy: a longitudinal study. J Urol 166:587–592
Michl UH, Friedrich MG, Graefen M et al (2006) Prediction of postoperative sexual function after nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 176:227–231
Nelson CJ, Deveci S, Stasi J et al (2010) Sexual Bother Following Radical Prostatectomy. J Sex Med 7:129–135
Riley A (2002) The role of the partner in erectile dysfunction and its treatment. Int J Impot Res 14(Suppl 1):105–109
Riley A, Riley E (2000) Behavioural and clinical findings in couples where the man presents with erectile disorder: a retrospective study. Int J Clin Pract 54:220–224
Rinnab L, Schrader AJ, Schrader M et al (2012) Male sexuality in the elderly. Urologe A 51:1399–1413
Rosen R, Altwein J, Boyle P et al (2003) Lower urinary tract symptoms and male sexual dysfunction: the multinational survey of the aging male (MSAM-7). Eur Urol 44:637–649
Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J et al (2000) The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex marital Ther 26:191–208
Rosen RC (2002) Assessment of female sexual dysfunction: review of validated methods. Fertil Steril 77(Suppl 4):89–93
Rosen RC, Cappelleri JC, Smith MD et al (1999) Development and evaluation of an abridged, 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) as a diagnostic tool for erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res 11:319–326
Rosing D, Berberich HJ (2004) Disease- and treatment related sexual disorders after radical prostatectomy. A biopsychosocial consideration. Urologe A 43:291–295
Sanda MG, Dunn RL, Michalski J et al (2008) Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors. N Engl J Med 358:1250–1261
Shindel A, Quayle S, Yan Y et al (2005) Sexual dysfunction in female partners of men who have undergone radical prostatectomy correlates with sexual dysfunction of the male partner. J Sex Med 2:833–841
Sivarajan G, Prabhu V, Taksler GB et al (2014) Ten-year outcomes of sexual function after radical prostatectomy: results of a prospective longitudinal study. Eur Urol 65:58–65
Stanford JL, Feng Z, Hamilton AS et al (2000) Urinary and sexual function after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study. JAMA 283:354–360
Wagner G, Fugl-Meyer KS, Fugl-Meyer AR (2000) Impact of erectile dysfunction on quality of life: patient and partner perspectives. Int J Impot Res 12(Suppl 4):144–146
Einhaltung ethischer Richtlinien
Interessenkonflikt. T.B. Jordan, R. Ernst, G. Hatzichristodoulou, A. Dinkel, T. Klorek, C. Beyrle, J.E. Gschwend und K. Herkommer geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht. Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jordan, T., Ernst, R., Hatzichristodoulou, G. et al. Paarsexualität 5 Jahre nach radikaler Prostatektomie. Urologe 54, 1407–1413 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-014-3755-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-014-3755-2