Skip to main content
Log in

Paarsexualität 5 Jahre nach radikaler Prostatektomie

Sexualität von Patient und Partnerin bei 1 Jahr postoperativ sexuell aktiven Paaren

Sexuality of couples 5 years after radical prostatectomy

Sexuality of patients and their partners 1 year postoperatively in sexually active couples

  • Originalien
  • Published:
Der Urologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Erektionsstörungen nach radikaler Prostatektomie (RPx) beeinflussen nicht nur das Sexualleben der Patienten, sondern auch das ihrer Partnerinnen. In der vorliegenden Arbeit wurde die Sexualität von Paaren, die 12 Monate nach nervschonender RPx Geschlechtsverkehr (GV) haben, 60 Monate postoperativ reevaluiert.

Patienten und Methode

36 Patienten (♂) und deren Partnerinnen (♀), die präoperativ und 12 Monate nach nerverhaltender RPx GV hatten, wurden 60 Monate postoperativ Fragebögen zugesandt, die die Häufigkeit des GV, die Zufriedenheit mit dem Sexualleben, die Verwendung von Hilfsmitteln, sowie die Sexualfunktion [♂: „International Index of Erectile Function 5“ (IIEF-5), ♀: „Female Sexual Function Index“ (FSFI)] erfassten.

Ergebnisse

Bei einer Rücklaufquote von 83,3 % bestand das auswertbare Kollektiv aus 30 Paaren. 70,0 % der Paare hatten 60 Monate postoperativ GV. Die Paare, die 60 Monate postoperativ GV hatten, waren wesentlich zufriedener (12 und 60 Monate postoperativ), hatten mehr GV (präoperativ und 12 Monate postoperativ), höhere IIEF-5-Scores (12 Monate postoperativ) und häufiger bilateral nervschonende Operationen als Paare, die 60 Monate postoperativ keinen GV hatten. Sie benutzten nach 60 Monaten in 80,0 % der Fälle keine Hilfsmittel oder ausschließlich PDE-5-Inhibitoren. Die Partnerinnen waren postoperativ zufriedener mit dem Sexualleben als die Patienten selbst. Paare, bei denen der Mann nach 60 Monaten einen IIEF-5-Score ≥ 19 hatte, waren zufriedener, hatten häufiger GV pro Monat und die Partnerinnen hatten höhere FSFI-Scores als jene Paare mit einem IIEF-5-Score < 19.

Schlussfolgerung

Paare, die 12 Monate nach RPx wieder GV haben, können dies meist auch langfristig weiterführen. Paare, die langfristig GV haben, sind zufriedener und hatten schon präoperativ und 1 Jahr postoperativ häufiger GV.

Abstract

Background

Erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy (RPx) does affect the sexual life of patients and their partners. In our study, we evaluated sexual life over the long-term of 60 months following nerve-sparing (ns) RPx in couples who successfully performed sexual intercourse (SI) 12 months after surgery.

Patients and method

A total of 36 patients and their female partners who had SI prior to and 12 months after nsRPx were included in this study. Sixty months following nsRPx, couples were asked about frequency of SI, satisfaction of sexual life, usage of medical aid for erections, and sexual function [patients: IIEF-5 (International Index of Erectile Function), partners: FSFI (Female Sexual Function Index)].

Results

Thirty couples (83.3%) were available for follow-up. A total of 70% of couples performed SI 60 months after nsRPx. In contrast to couples who did not have SI 60 months after nsRPx, couples who successfully had SI were more satisfied, had SI more often, had higher IIEF-5 scores, and higher frequency of bilateral ns surgery. In 80% of those patients, no medical aid except PDE-5 inhibitors were used. The partners of those patients were more satisfied with their sexual life, compared to the patients themselves. Couples, in whom the patient had IIEF-5 scores ≥19 were more satisfied, had SI more often, and the partners had higher FSFI scores, compared to couples with patients’ IIEF-5 scores <19.

Conclusion

Couples who had successfully performed SI within 12 months following nsRPx continue to have satisfying SI in the long-term. Those couples are more satisfied with their sexual life and have SI more often prior to and 12 months after nsRPx.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4

Literatur

  1. Albersen MJS, Van Poppel H (2009) The Use of IIEF-5 for reporting erectile dysfunction following nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Open Prost Cancer J 2:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bannowsky A, Raileanu A, Uckert S et al (2013) Rehabilitation of erectile function after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: therapeutic concepts in Germany. Urologe A 52:1679–1683

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bannowsky A, Schulze H, Van Der Horst C et al (2005) Erectile function after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Nocturnal early erection as a parameter of postoperative organic erectile integrity. Urologe A 44:521–526

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Boehmer U, Babayan RK (2004) Facing erectile dysfunction due to prostate cancer treatment: perspectives of men and their partners. Cancer Invest 22:840–848

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Boorjian SA, Eastham JA, Graefen M et al (2012) A critical analysis of the long-term impact of radical prostatectomy on cancer control and function outcomes. Eur Urol 61:664–675

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Carroll JL, Bagley DH (1990) Evaluation of sexual satisfaction in partners of men experiencing erectile failure. J Sex Marital Ther 16:70–78

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cayan S, Bozlu M, Canpolat B et al (2004) The assessment of sexual functions in women with male partners complaining of erectile dysfunction: does treatment of male sexual dysfunction improve female partner’s sexual functions? J Sex Marital Ther 30:333–341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Crowe H, Costello AJ (2003) Prostate cancer: perspectives on quality of life and impact of treatment on patients and their partners. Urol Nurs 23:279–285

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Descazeaud A, Debre B, Flam TA (2006) Age difference between patient and partner is a predictive factor of potency rate following radical prostatectomy. J Urol 176:2594–2598

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dubbelman YD, Dohle GR, Schroder FH (2006) Sexual function before and after radical retropubic prostatectomy: a systematic review of prognostic indicators for a successful outcome. Eur Urol 50:711–720

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gacci M, Simonato A, Masieri L et al (2009) Urinary and sexual outcomes in long-term (5+ years) prostate cancer disease free survivors after radical prostatectomy. Health Qual Life Outcomes 7:94

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Glickman L, Godoy G, Lepor H (2009) Changes in continence and erectile function between 2 and 4 years after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 181:731–735

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Goldstein I, Fisher WA, Sand M et al (2005) Women’s sexual function improves when partners are administered vardenafil for erectile dysfunction: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Sex Med 2:819–832

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Heathcote PS, Mactaggart PN, Boston RJ et al (1998) Health-related quality of life in Australian men remaining disease-free after radical prostatectomy. Med J Aust 168:483–486

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hollenbeck BK, Dunn RL, Wei JT et al (2003) Determinants of long-term sexual health outcome after radical prostatectomy measured by a validated instrument. J Urol 169:1453–1457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hurlbert DF, Apt C, Rabehl SM (1993) Key variables to understanding female sexual satisfaction: an examination of women in nondistressed marriages. J Sex Marital Ther 19:154–165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Litwin MS, Melmed GY, Nakazon T (2001) Life after radical prostatectomy: a longitudinal study. J Urol 166:587–592

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Michl UH, Friedrich MG, Graefen M et al (2006) Prediction of postoperative sexual function after nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 176:227–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nelson CJ, Deveci S, Stasi J et al (2010) Sexual Bother Following Radical Prostatectomy. J Sex Med 7:129–135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Riley A (2002) The role of the partner in erectile dysfunction and its treatment. Int J Impot Res 14(Suppl 1):105–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Riley A, Riley E (2000) Behavioural and clinical findings in couples where the man presents with erectile disorder: a retrospective study. Int J Clin Pract 54:220–224

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rinnab L, Schrader AJ, Schrader M et al (2012) Male sexuality in the elderly. Urologe A 51:1399–1413

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rosen R, Altwein J, Boyle P et al (2003) Lower urinary tract symptoms and male sexual dysfunction: the multinational survey of the aging male (MSAM-7). Eur Urol 44:637–649

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J et al (2000) The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex marital Ther 26:191–208

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rosen RC (2002) Assessment of female sexual dysfunction: review of validated methods. Fertil Steril 77(Suppl 4):89–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rosen RC, Cappelleri JC, Smith MD et al (1999) Development and evaluation of an abridged, 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) as a diagnostic tool for erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res 11:319–326

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rosing D, Berberich HJ (2004) Disease- and treatment related sexual disorders after radical prostatectomy. A biopsychosocial consideration. Urologe A 43:291–295

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sanda MG, Dunn RL, Michalski J et al (2008) Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors. N Engl J Med 358:1250–1261

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Shindel A, Quayle S, Yan Y et al (2005) Sexual dysfunction in female partners of men who have undergone radical prostatectomy correlates with sexual dysfunction of the male partner. J Sex Med 2:833–841

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sivarajan G, Prabhu V, Taksler GB et al (2014) Ten-year outcomes of sexual function after radical prostatectomy: results of a prospective longitudinal study. Eur Urol 65:58–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Stanford JL, Feng Z, Hamilton AS et al (2000) Urinary and sexual function after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study. JAMA 283:354–360

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wagner G, Fugl-Meyer KS, Fugl-Meyer AR (2000) Impact of erectile dysfunction on quality of life: patient and partner perspectives. Int J Impot Res 12(Suppl 4):144–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Einhaltung ethischer Richtlinien

Interessenkonflikt. T.B. Jordan, R. Ernst, G. Hatzichristodoulou, A. Dinkel, T. Klorek, C. Beyrle, J.E. Gschwend und K. Herkommer geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht. Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Herkommer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jordan, T., Ernst, R., Hatzichristodoulou, G. et al. Paarsexualität 5 Jahre nach radikaler Prostatektomie. Urologe 54, 1407–1413 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-014-3755-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-014-3755-2

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation