Skip to main content
Log in

Feasibility of micro-extraction and subsequent HPLC analysis for evaluating the extractable formaldehyde content of medium-density fiber board

  • Original
  • Published:
European Journal of Wood and Wood Products Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The perforator method is a widely accepted standard method for evaluating formaldehyde contents in medium-density fiber board (MDF) and particle board in most countries in the world. However, the test consumes considerable amounts of toluene, which belongs to a category of poisonous organic solutions. This study was conducted to determine the formaldehyde content of MDF accurately by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), a method that uses significantly less amounts of organic solvents for extraction than other methods. Five extraction solvents, namely, ethyl acetate, acetonitrile, methyl alcohol, dichloromethane, and petroleum ether, were used in the experiment. 2,4-Dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) derivatization and HPLC analysis coupled with UV detection were conducted. Optimum micro-extraction was obtained by using acetonitrile, especially formaldehyde contents below 6 mg/100 g. Three parallel tests demonstrated good average recoveries ranging from 95.4 to 97.9 % and low relative standard deviations ranging from 1.1 to 2.9 %, which is indicative of very high accuracy. A 0.02 mg/100 g limit of detection was also obtained. The formaldehyde–DNPH derivatives remained stable for at least 48 h under ambient conditions, which indicates the applicability of the proposed method in the laboratory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Air Resources Board Method 430 (1991) Determination of formaldehyde and acetaldehyde in emissions from stationary sources. California Environmental Protection Agency, Sacramento

    Google Scholar 

  • AS/NZS 4266.15 (1995) Reconstituted wood-based panels—methods of test-Determination of formaldehyde (perforator method). Australian/New Zealand Standard

  • ASTM D 5197 (2009) Standard Test Method for Determination of Formaldehyde and Other Carbonyl Compounds in Air (Active Sampler Methodology). ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  • BS EN 120 (1984, re 1992) Standard addition recovery test Wood based panels Determination of formaldehyde content Extraction method called the perforator method. British Standards Institution

  • BS EN 717-1 (2004) Wood-based panels-determination of formaldehyde release-Part 1: formaldehyde emission by the chamber method. British Standards Institution

  • Bulian F, Battaglia R, Ciroi S (2003) Formaldehyde emission from wood based panels the importance of intercalibrating the test methods. Holz Roh- Werkst 61:213–215

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burini G, Coli R (2004) Determination of formaldehyde in spirits by highperformance liquid chromatography with diode-array detection after derivatization. Anal Chim Acta 511:155–158

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • GB/T 17657 (1999, re 2013) Test methods of evaluating the properties of wood-based panels and surface decorated wood-based panels. Chinese Standard

  • Geise GM, Falcon LP, Freeman BD, Paul DR (2012) Sodium chloride sorption in sulfonated polymers for membrane applications. J Membr Sci 423–424(15):195–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GOST 27678 (1988) Wood particle boards. Perforator method for determining formaldehyde content. Gosudarstvennye Standarty State Standard GOST (Russian)

  • Irakli MN, Samanidou VF, Biliaderis CG, Papadoyannis IN (2012) Development and validation of an HPLC-method for determination of free and bound phenolic acids in cereals after solid-phase extraction. Food Chem 134(3):1624–1632

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ISO 12460-5 (2011) Wood-based panels-determination of formaldehyde release-Part 5: extraction method (called the perforator method). ISO International Organization for Standardization

  • Jones SB, Terry CM, Lister TE, Johnson DC (1999) Determination of submicromolar concentrations of formaldehyde by liquid chromatography. Anal Chem 71:4030–4033

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roffael E, Mehlhorn L (1980) Influence of marginal conditions on the determination of extractable formaldehyde by the perforator method (In German). Holz Roh- Werkst 38:85–88

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soman A, Qiu Y, Chan Li Q (2008) HPLC–UV method development and validation for the determination of low level formaldehyde in a drug substance. J Chromatogr Sci 46:461–465

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang T, Gao XL, Tong J, Chen LG (2012) Determination of formaldehyde in beer based on cloud point extraction using 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine as derivative reagent. Food Chem 131:1577–1582

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu X, Su R, Zhao X, Liu Z, Li D, Li XY, Zhang HQ, Wang ZM (2011) Determination of formaldehyde in beverages using microwave-assisted derivatization and ionic liquid-based dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction followed by high-performance liquid chromatography. Talanta 85(5):2632–2638

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by Special Fund for Forest Scientific Research in the Public Welfare (201304501) and HYPERLINK “javascript:void(0);” Zhejiang HYPERLINK “javascript:void(0);” Province and Chinese Academy of Forestry cooperation projects (2014SY11).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenji Yu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, H., Yang, L., Xu, M. et al. Feasibility of micro-extraction and subsequent HPLC analysis for evaluating the extractable formaldehyde content of medium-density fiber board. Eur. J. Wood Prod. 73, 801–806 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-015-0945-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-015-0945-6

Keywords

Navigation