Skip to main content
Log in

Therapie der Sphinkterinsuffizienz

Treatment of sphincter insufficiency

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Chirurg Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die chirurgische Behandlung der analen Sphinkterinsuffizienz ist nur indiziert, wenn sie zu Symptomen führt und eine konservative Therapie keine ausreichende Symptomlinderung erzielt. Im letzten Jahrzehnt haben sich unterschiedliche chirurgische Behandlungsmethoden entwickelt. Die Evidenz ihrer Wirksamkeit variiert erheblich. Manche haben aufgrund ihrer Effektivität, ihrer einfachen Anwendbarkeit und ihres geringen Risikoprofils breite Akzeptanz gefunden. Die Arbeit hat zum Ziel, die derzeit allgemein akzeptiertesten und am häufigsten angewandten chirurgischen Techniken zur Behandlung der analen Sphinkterinsuffizienz und die erzielten Ergebnisse darzustellen, die Techniken in den Kontext eines Behandlungsalgorithmus einzuordnen und neuere Methoden, die Potenzial für die Zukunft bergen, vorzustellen

Abstract

Surgical therapy of anal sphincter insufficiency is only indicated if it leads to symptoms and conservative treatment fails to achieve adequate symptom relief. Various new surgical options have evolved over the last decade but evidence of the efficacy varies substantially. Some have gained broader clinical acceptance based on the efficacy, ease of applicability and low risk profile. The paper aims to outline the currently commonly accepted and frequently applied surgical techniques for the treatment of anal sphincter insufficiency and the results, put these into the context of a treatment algorithm and to present novel techniques which carry potential for the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1

Literatur

  1. Abrams P, Andersson KE, Birder L et al (2010) Evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and fecal incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 29:213–240

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Baeten CG, Bailey HR, Bakka A et al (2000) Safety and efficacy of dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence: report of a prospective, multicenter trial. Dynamic Graciloplasty Therapy Study Group. Dis Colon Rectum 43:743–751

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Baumgartner U (2012) The artificial sphincter: therapy for faecal incontinence. Zentralbl Chir 137:340–344

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bock S, Folie P, Wolff K et al (2010) First experiences with pudendal nerve stimulation in fecal incontinence: a technical report. Tech Coloproctol 14:41–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Boyle DJ, Prosser K, Allison ME et al (2010) Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for the treatment of urge fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 53:432–437

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Boyle DJ, Knowles CH, Lunniss PJ et al (2009) Efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence in patients with anal sphincter defects. Dis Colon Rectum 52:1234–1239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chapmann AE, Geerdes B, Hewett P et al (2002) Systematic review of dynamic graciloplasty in the treatment of faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 89:138–153

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dudding TC, Vaizey CJ, Kamm MA (2008) Obstetric anal sphincter injury: incidence, risk factors, and management. Ann Surg 247:224–237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Govaert B, Pares D, Delgado-Aros S et al (2009) A prospective multicenter study to investigate percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for the treatment of faecal incontinence. Colorectal Dis 12:1236–1241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Graf W, Mellgren A, Matzel KE et al (2011) Efficacy of dextranomer in stabilised hyaluronic acid for treatment of faecal incontinence: a randomised, sham-controlled trial. Lancet 377:997–1003

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Halverson AL, Hull TL (2002) Long-term outcome of overlapping anal sphincter repair. Dis Colon Rectum 45:345–348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Konsten J, Baeten CGMI, Havenith MG, Soeters PB (1993) Morphology of dynamic graciloplasty compared with the anal sphincter. Dis Colon Rectum 36:559–563

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lehur PA, Glemain P, Bruley des Varannes S et al (1998) Outcome of patients with an implanted artificial anal sphincter for severe faecal incontinence. A single institution report. Int J Colorectal Dis 13:88–92

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lehur PA, Roig J, Duinslaeger M (2000) Artificial anal sphincter: Prospective clinical and manometric evaluation. Dis Colon Rectum 43:1213–1216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lehur PA, McNevin S, Buntzen S et al (2010) Magnetic anal sphincter augmentation for the treatment of fecal incontinence: a preliminary report from a feasibility study. Dis Colon Rectum 53:1604–1610

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Madoff RD, Parker SC, Varma MV, Lowry AC (2004) Fecal incontinence in adults. Lancet 364:621–632

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Madoff R, Laurberg S, Matzel KE et al (2009) In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A (Hrsg) Incontinence, 4th International Consultation on Incontinence, 4. Aufl. Health Publications Ltd, S 1387–1417, 1804–1805

  18. Matzel KE, Madoff R, LaFontaine LJ et al (2001) Complications of dynamic graciloplasty: Incidence, management and impact on outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 44:1427–1435

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Matzel KE, Stadelmaier U, Hohenberger W (2004) Innovations in fecal incontinence: sacral nerve stimulation. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1720–1728

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Matzel KE, Stadelmaier U, Besendörfer M, Hohenberger W (2005) Pudendal stimulation for anorectal dysfunction – the first application of a fully implantable microstimulator. Colorect Dis 7:176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Matzel KE (2011) Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: its role in the treatment algorithm. Colorectal Dis 13(Suppl 2):10–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mundy L, Merlin TL, Maddern GJ, Hiller JE (2004) Systematic review of safety and effectiveness of an artificial bowel sphincter for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 91:665–672

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Norton C, Cody JD, Hosker G (2006) Biofeedback and/or sphincter exercises for the treatment of faecal incontinence in adults. Cochrane database of systematic reviews, Cochrane library. JohnWiley&Sons, Chichester (UK)

  24. Tan JJ, Chan M, Tjandra JJ (2007) Evolving therapy for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1950–1967

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tjandra JJ, Han WR, Goh J et al (2003) Direct repair vs. Overlapping sphincter repair: a randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 46:937–942

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Tjandra JJ, Lim JF, Matzel KE (2004) Sacral nerve stimulation – an emerging treatment for faecal incontinence. ANZ J Surg 74:1098–1106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tjandra JJ, Lim JF, Hiscock R, Rajendra P (2004) Injectable silicone biomaterial for fecal incontinence caused by internal anal sphincter dysfunction is effective. Dis Colon Rectum 47:2138–2146

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wong WD, Congliosi SM, Spencer MP et al (2002) The safety and efficacy of the artificial bowel sphincter for fecal incontinence: results from a multicenter cohort study. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1139–1153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Zutshi M, Salcedo L, Hammel J, Hull T (2010) Anal physiology testing in fecal incontinence: is it of any value? Int J Colorectal Dis 25:277–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor weist für sich und seinen Koautor auf folgende Beziehungen hin: K E. Matzel: ärztlicher Berater für Medtronic, AMS, QMed, Oceana. B. Bittorf: Referent für Medtronic.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K.E. Matzel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matzel, K., Bittorf, B. Therapie der Sphinkterinsuffizienz. Chirurg 84, 39–45 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-012-2351-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-012-2351-5

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation