Zusammenfassung
Hintergrund
Beim ungeschützten Luftweg werden aktuell nach 30 Thoraxkompressionen 2 Beatmungen mit einer Inspirationszeit von 1 s empfohlen; damit benötigt die Ventilation ca. 15% statt bisher ca. 40% der Reanimationszeit.
Methoden
Im Simulationsmodell wurde untersucht, wie sich eine von 2 auf 1 s reduzierte Beatmungszeit durch einen neuartigen spitzenfluss- und druckbegrenzenden Beatmungsbeutel (Smart-Bag®) bei kontinuierlich abfallendem unteren Ösophagussphinkterdruck (UÖSD) auf Atemmechanik und Magenbeatmung auswirkt.
Ergebnisse
Eine Verkürzung der Inspirationszeit von 2 auf 1 s führte zu niedrigeren Atemwegspitzendrücken bei einem UÖSD von 0,49 kPa (5 cmH2O), 0,98 kPa (10 cmH2O) sowie 1,47 kPa (15 cmH2O) und bei 1,96 kPa (20 cmH2O) zu höheren Atemwegsspitzendrücken. Die Lungentidalvolumina waren bei 1 s gegenüber 2 s erniedrigt. Bei einer Verkürzung der Inspirationszeit von 2 auf 1 s kam es nur bei einem UÖSD von 0,49 kPa (5 cmH2O) zu einer Magenbeatmung.
Schlussfolgerung
In diesem Simulationsmodell eines Lungengesunden mit ungeschütztem Atemweg führte eine von 2 auf 1 s reduzierte Inspirationszeit bei Anwendung des Smart-Bag® zu vergleichbaren inspiratorischen Spitzendrücken und erniedrigten, aber klinisch vergleichbaren Lungentidalvolumina. Eine Magenbeatmung trat nur bei einem UÖSD von 0,49 kPa (5 cmH2O) auf und war bei einer Beatmungszeit von 2 s höher als bei 1 s.
Abstract
Background
Currently 30 chest compressions and 2 ventilations with an inspiratory time of 1 s are recommended during cardiopulmonary resuscitation with an unprotected airway, thus spending about 15% instead of 40% of resuscitation time on ventilation. Time could be gained for chest compressions when reducing inspiratory time from 2 s to 1 s, however, stomach inflation may increase as well.
Methods
In an established bench model we evaluated the effect of reducing inspiratory time from 2 s to 1 s at different lower oesophageal sphincter pressure (LOSP) levels using a novel peak inspiratory-flow and peak airway-pressure-limiting bag-valve-mask device (Smart-Bag™).
Results
A reduction of inspiratory time from 2 s to 1 s resulted in significantly lower peak airway pressure with LOSP of 0.49 kPa (5 cmH2O), 0.98 kPa (10 cmH2O) and 1.47 kPa (15 cmH2O) and an increase with 1.96 kPa (20 cmH2O). Lung tidal volume was reduced with 1 s compared to 2 s. When reducing inspiratory time from 2 s to 1 s, stomach inflation occurred only at a LOSP of 0.49 kPa (5 cmH2O).
Conclusions
In this model of a simulated unprotected airway, a reduction of inspiratory time from 2 s to 1 s using the Smart-Bag™ resulted in comparable inspiratory peak airway pressure and lower, but clinically comparable, lung tidal volume. Stomach inflation occurred only at a LOSP of 0.49 kPa (5 cmH2O), and was higher with an inspiratory time of 2 s vs 1 s.
Literatur
Anonymous (2000) Guidelines 2000 for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. International consensus on science. Resuscitation 46:1–447
Aufderheide TP, Sigurdsson G, Pirrallo RG et al. (2004) Hyperventilation-induced hypotension during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Circulation 109: 1960–1965
Baskett P, Nolan J, Parr M (1996) Tidal volumes which are perceived to be adequate for resuscitation. Resuscitation 31: 231–234
Berg RA, Sanders AB, Kern KB et al. (2001) Adverse hemodynamic effects of interrupting chest compressions for rescue breathing during cardiopulmonary resuscitation for ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest. Circulation 104: 2465–2470
Bowman FP, Menegazzi JJ, Check BD, Duckett TM (1995) Lower esophageal sphincter pressure during prolonged cardiac arrest and resuscitation. Ann Emerg Med 26: 216–219
Davis K Jr, Johannigman JA, Johnson RC Jr, Branson RD (1995) Lung compliance following cardiac arrest. Acad Emerg Med 2: 874–878
Gabrielli A, Wenzel V, Layon J et al. (2005) Lower esophageal sphincter pressure-measurement during cardiac arrest in humans: potential implications for ventilation of the unprotected airway. Anesthesiology 103: 897–899
Gallagher EJ, Lombardi G, Gennis P (1995) Effectiveness of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA 274: 1922–1925
Goedecke A von, Wagner-Berger HG, Stadlbauer KH et al. (2004) Effects of decreasing peak flow rate on stomach inflation during bag-valve-mask ventilation. Resuscitation 63: 131–136
Goedecke A von, Bowden K, Keller C et al. (2005) Verkürzte Inspirationszeit während der Beatmung eines ungeschützten Atemweges. Effekt auf die Magen- und Lungenbeatmung im Simulationsmodell. Anaesthesist 54: 117–122
Goedecke A von, Bowden K, Wenzel V et al. (2005) Effects of decreasing inspiratory times during simulated bag-valve-mask ventilation. Resuscitation 64: 321–325
Goedecke A von, Keller C, Voelckel WG et al. (2005) Die Maskenbeatmung als Rückzugsstrategie zur endotrachealen Intubation. Anaesthesist 55: 70–79
Idris AH, Banner MJ, Wenzel V et al. (1994) Ventilation caused by external chest compression is unable to sustain effective gas exchange during CPR: a comparison with mechanical ventilation. Resuscitation 28: 143–150
Markstaller K, Eberle B, Dick WF (2004) Kardiopulmonale Reanimation „oben ohne“. Mode oder Wissenschaft? Anaesthesist 53: 927–936
Nolan JP, Deakin CD, Soar J, Bottiger BW, Smith G; European Resuscitation Council (2005) European Resuscitation Council guidelines for resuscitation 2005. Section 4. Adult advanced life support. Resuscitation 67 [Suppl 1]: S39–86
Paradis NA, Martin GB, Goetting MG et al. (1989) Simultaneous aortic, jugular bulb, and right atrial pressures during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in humans. Insights into mechanisms. Circulation 80: 361–368
Sanders AB, Kern KB, Berg RA et al. (2002) Survival and neurologic outcome after cardiopulmonary resuscitation with four different chest compression-ventilation ratios. Ann Emerg Med 40: 553–562
Sato Y, Weil MH, Sun S et al. (1997) Adverse effects of interrupting precordial compression during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Crit Care Med 25: 733–736
Stallinger A, Wenzel V, Wagner-Berger H et al. (2002) Effects of decreasing inspiratory flow rate during simulated basic life support ventilation of a cardiac arrest patient on lung and stomach tidal volumes. Resuscitation 54: 167–173
Stallinger A, Wenzel V, Wagner-Berger HG et al. (2004) A strategy to optimise the performance of the mouth-to-bag resuscitator using small tidal volumes: effects on lung and gastric ventilation in a bench model of an unprotected airway. Resuscitation 61: 69–74
Sunde K, Wik L, Naess PA et al. (1998) Improved haemodynamics with increased compression-decompression rates during ACD-CPR in pigs. Resuscitation 39: 197–205
Wagner-Berger HG, Wenzel V, Voelckel WG et al. (2003) A pilot study to evaluate the SMART BAG: a new pressure-responsive, gas-flow limiting bag-valve-mask device. Anesth Analg 97: 1686–1689
Weil MH, Rackow EC, Trevino R et al. (1986) Difference in acid-base state between venous and arterial blood during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. N Engl J Med 315: 153–156
Wenzel V, Idris AH, Banner MJ et al. (1998) Influence of tidal volume on the distribution of gas between the lungs and stomach in the nonintubated patient receiving positive-pressure ventilation. Crit Care Med 26: 364–368
Wenzel V, Keller C, Idris AH et al. (1999) Effects of smaller tidal volumes during basic life support ventilation in patients with respiratory arrest: good ventilation, less risk? Resuscitation 43: 25–29
Wik L, Steen PA, Bircher NG (1994) Quality of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation influences outcome after prehospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 28: 195–203
Wik L, Hansen TB, Fylling F et al. (2003) Delaying defibrillation to give basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation to patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation: a randomized trial. JAMA 289: 1389–1395
Wik L, Kramer-Johansen J, Myklebust H et al. (2005) Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA 293: 299–304
Winkler M, Mauritz W, Hackl W et al. (1998) Effects of half the tidal volume during cardiopulmonary resuscitation on acid-base balance and haemodynamics in pigs. Eur J Emerg Med 5: 201–206
Yu T, Wei MHl, Tang W (2002) Adverse outcomes of interrupted precordial compression during automated defibrillation. Circulation 106: 368–372
Danksagung
Diese Studie wurde durch die Österreichische Nationalbank, Projekt Nr. 9513 und 11448, Wien, Österreich, unterstützt.
Interessenkonflikt
Es besteht kein Interessenkonflikt. Der korrespondierende Autor versichert, dass keine Verbindungen mit einer Firma, deren Produkt in dem Artikel genannt ist, oder einer Firma, die ein Konkurrenzprodukt vertreibt, bestehen. Die Präsentation des Themas ist unabhängig und die Darstellung der Inhalte produktneutral.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
von Goedecke, A., Paal, P., Keller, C. et al. Beatmung eines ungeschützten Atemwegs. Anaesthesist 55, 629–634 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-006-1013-8
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-006-1013-8